References
- Brayton, Flint, and Mauskopf, Eileen. “The Federal Reserve Board MPS Quarterly Econometric Model of the U.S. Economy.” Economic Modelling, July 1985, 2, 170–292.
- Dewald, William G.; Thursby, Jerry G.; and Anderson, Richard G. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” American Economic Review, September 1986, 76, 587–603.
- Dobson, Steven W.; Sutch, Richard C.; and Vanderford, David E. “An Evalutation of Alternative Empirical Models of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, September 1976, 31, 1035–1065.
- Goldfeld, Stephen M. “The Case of the Missing Money.” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1976, 3, 683–730.
- Hamburger, Michael J., and Latta, Cynthia M. “The Term Structure of Interest Rates: Some Additional Evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, February 1969, 1, 71–83.
- Hausman, Daniel M. “Economic Methodology in a Nutshell.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Spring 1989, 5, 115–127.
- Merton, Robert C. “In Honor of Nobel Laureate, Franco Modigliani.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Fall 1987, 1, 145–155.
- Modigliani, Franco. “Comment on The Determination of Long-Term Interest Rates: Implications for Monetary and Fiscal Policy.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, May 1980, 72, 370–373.
- Modigliani, Franco. and Shiller, Robert J. “Inflation, Rational Expectations and the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Economica, February 1973, 40, 12–43.
- Modigliani, Franco. and Sutch, Richard. “Innovations in Interest Rate Policy.” American Economic Review, May 1966, 56, 178–197.
- Modigliani, Franco. “Debt Management and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: An Empirical Analysis of Recent Experience.” Journal of Political Economy, August 1967, Supplement, 75, 569–589.
- Modigliani, Franco. “The Term Structure of Interest Rates: A Reexamination of the Evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, February 1969, 1, 112–120.
- Phillips, Llad, and Pippenger, John. “Preferred Habitat vs. Efficient Market: A Test of Alternative Hypotheses.” Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May 1976, 58, 11–19.