Harrod–Robinson–Read Measures of Primary Input Productivity: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Data

References

• Carter, Anne. Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Cekota, J. “Technological Change in Canada (1961-80): An Application of the Surrogate Wage Function.” The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1988, 27, 348–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekota, J. The Principal Thrust and Industrial Origins of Technological Evolution in Canada (1961-80). Unpublished research paper, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, E. F. Trends in American Economic Growth. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, E. F. Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, Rene, and Salem, Mehrzad. Alternative Measures of Productivity Growth in a Rectangular Input-Output Framework. Working Paper, Statistics Canada, Input-Output Division, Ottawa, November 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. “Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another Non-Explanation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Fall 1988, 2, 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulten, Charles. “On the Importance of Productivity Change.” American Economic Review, March 1979, 69, 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, J. W. “Productivity Trends in the United States.” In Shlomo Maital and Noah M. Meltz, eds., Lagging Productivity Growth. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, J. W. “Review of D. Jorgenson, et al. Productivity and US. Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1989, 27(3), 1188–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontief, Wassily. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., and Blair, P. Input Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Norsworthy, J. R., and Malmquist, David. “Input Measurement and Productivity Growth in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing.” American Economic Review, December 1983, 75, 947–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa, E. “An Input-Output Study of Labor Productivity in the U.S. Economy, 194772.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Fall 1986, 9(1), 111–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, Luigi L. “The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis.” Metroeconomica, April 1973, 25, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, Luigi L. Structural Change and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, William. “Total Factor Productivity in the U.K.: A Disaggregated Analysis.” In K. D. Patterson and Kerry Schott, eds., The Measurement of Capital: Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Postner, H. H., and Wesa, L. Canadian Productivity Growth: An Alternative. (Input-Output) Analysis Economic Council of Canada, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Read, I. M. “The Measure of Total Factor Productivity Appropriate to Wage-Price Guidelines.” Canadian Journal of Economics, May 1968, 1, 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymes, Thomas K. “The Measurement of Capital and Total Factor Productivity in the Context of the Cambridge Theory of Capital.” Review of Income and Wealth, series 18, March 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, Thomas K. “More on the Measurement of Total Factor Productivity.” Review of Income and Wealth, series 29, September 1983, 297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, Thomas K. “The Measurement of Multifactor Productivity in an Input-Output Framework: New Canadian Estimates.” In A. Franz and N. Rainer, eds., Problems of Compilation of Input-Output Tables. Vienna: Orac-Verlag, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Statistics of the United States. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business. “Employment and Employee Compensation in the 1977 Input-Output Accounts.” November 1985. (Data for 1972 were published in the October 1982 issue of the Survey. 1967 data were published as BEA Staff paper #31, February 1978.)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business. “New Structures and Equipment by Using Industries, 1977.” November 1985. (Data for 1972 and 1967 were published in the July 1980 and September 1975 issues of the Survey.)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Trends in Multifactor Productivity, 1948-81, ” Bulletin 2178. Washington, DC: USGPO, September 1983.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Time Series Data for Input-Output Industries. Bulletin 2018. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Edward N. “The Rate of Surplus Value, the Organic Composition, and the General Rate of Profit in the U.S. Economy, 1947-1967.” American Economic Review, June 1979, 69, 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Edward N. “Industrial Composition, Interindustry Effects, and the U.S. Productivity Slowdown.” Review of Economics and Statistics, May 1985a, 67, 268–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Edward N. “The Magnitude and Causes of the Recent Productivity Slowdown in the United States: A Survey of Recent Studies.” In William Baumol and Kenneth McLennan, eds., Productivity Growth and U.S. Competitiveness. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985b.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Allan, “BEA’s Measurement of Computer Output.” Survey of Current Business, 1989, 69(7), 108–115.
   Google Scholar