Philosophy of Science and Contemporary Economics: An Overview

References

• Abbagnano, N. “Positivism.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillan, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, J. A Realist Philosophy of Science. New York: St. Martin’s, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A., ed. Logical Positivism.New York: Free Press, 1959a.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. Editor’s Introduction. In Logical Positivism, A. Ayer, ed. New York: Free Press, 1959b.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G., The New Scientific Spirit.Boston: Beacon, 1984. (First French ed., 1934.)
   Google Scholar
• Bames, B. T. S. Kuhn and Social Science. London: Macmillan, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Bames, B. “On the Conventional Character of Knowledge and Cognition.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, K. Knoir-Cetina and M. Mulkay, eds. London: Sage, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, C. Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York: Dover, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. The Restructuring cf Social and Political Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science, 2d ed. Brighton, UK: Harvester, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980a.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980b.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. Economics through the Looking Glass. London: IEA, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. “The Strengths of the Strong Programme.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1981, 11, 173–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, L. The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, J., and Canterbery, E. “The Orthodoxy and Professional Legitimacy: Toward a Critical Sociology of Economics.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 1986, 4, 229–250.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. “Some Problems with Falsificationism in Economics.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1984a, 14, 489–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B., ed. Appraisal and Criticism in Economics. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1984b.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F. The Too of Physics, 2d ed. Boston: New Science Library, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. What Is This Thing Called Science? 2d ed. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Chubin, D., and Restivo, S. “The ‘Mooting’ of Science Studies: Research Programmes and Science Policy.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, eds. London: Sage, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Coats, A. “Economic Methodology: Theory, Practice, and the Current State of Economics.” Kyklos, 1986, 39, 109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, A. “The Rationale of General Equilibrium.” Economic Inquiry, 1975, 13, 539–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. “The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal, 1982, 92, 320–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, E. “The New Politics of Knowledge: Rorty’s Pragmatism and the Rhetoric of the Human Sciences.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1987, 17, 337–394.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. God and the New Physics. London: Dent, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• De Marchi, N., ed. The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, F. “The Significance of Significance: Rhetorical Aspects of Statistical Hypothesis Testing in Economics.” In The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric, A. Klamer, D. McCloskey, and R. Solow, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Doppelt, G. “The Philosophical Requirements for an Adequate Conception of Scientific Rationality.” Philosophy of Science, 1988, 55, 104–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Editors’ Introduction.” Economics and Philosophy, 185, 1, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner, A. Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. Against Method. London: New Left Books, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. Philosophical Papers, vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics, M. Friedman, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, P. The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Vol. 1: The Rise of Modern Paganism. New York: Knopf, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Giedymin, J. “Antipositivism in Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science and Humanities.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1975, 26, 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., and Johnson, W. “Metaphysics, MSRP and Economics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1988, 39, 313–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, A. The Development of Economic Doctrine. London: Longman, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Halfpenny, P. Positivism and Sociology. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. “What Economics Is Not: An Economist’s Response to Rosenberg.” Philosophy of Science, 1984a, 51, 495–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hands, D. “Blaug’s Economic Methodology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1984b, 14, 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S., ed. Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, R. Varieties of Realism: A Rationale for the Natural Sciences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. “Is Falsification Unpractised or Unpracticable?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1985, 15, 313–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. “An Appraisal of Popperian Methodology.” In The Popperian Legacy in Economics, N. De Marchi, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Heisenberg, W. The Physicist’s Conception of Nature. London: Hutchinson, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. “The Empiricist Criterion of Meaning.” In Logical Positivism, A. Ayer, ed. New York: Free Press, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. “Econometrics—Alchemy or Science?” Economica, 1980, 47, 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. The Structure of Scientific Inference. London: Macmillan, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. Causality in Economics. Canberra: ANU Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, eds. “A Statement of Purposes.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1978, 1, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. “Positivism.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Katouzian, H. Ideology and Method in Economics. London: Macmillan, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Klamer, A.; McCloskey, D.; and Solow, R., eds. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, M. Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K., and Mulkay, M. “Emerging Principles in Social Studies of Sciences.” In science observed: perspectives on the social study of science, K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, eds. London: Sage, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Kolakowski, L. Positivist Philosophy: From Hume to the Vienna Circle. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A., eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Latsis, S., ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. Science and Values.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Learner, E. “Let’s Take the Con out of Econometrics.” American Economic Review, 1983, 73, 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learner, E. “Self-Interpretation.” Economics and Philosophy, 1985a, 1, 295–302.
   Google Scholar
• Learner, E. “Sensitivity Analyses Would Help.” American Economic Review, 1985b, 75, 308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts.” American Economic Review, 1971, 61, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, R.; Langley, P.; and Mahoney, D. Positive Economics for Australian Students, 2d ed. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J.; Krauz, M.; and Burian, R. Rationality, Relativism and the Human Sciences. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• McAleer, M.; Pagan, A.; and Volker, P. “What Will Take the Con out of Econometrics?” American Economic Review, 1985, 75, 293–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, P. Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics and the New Economic History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Mini, P. Philosophy and Economics. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. “Physics and the ‘Marginalist Revolution.’” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1984, 8, 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., ed. The Reconstruction of Economic Theory. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. “Shall I Compare Thee to a Minkowski-Ricardo-Leontief-Metzler Matrix of the Mosak-Hicks Type? Economics and Philosophy, 1987, 3, 69–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morowitz, H. “Rediscovering the Mind.” In The Mind’s I, D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett, eds. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. “Don Quixote’s Double: A Self-Exemplifying Text.” In Knowledge and Reflexivity, S. Woolgar, ed. London: Sage, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J.; Megill, A.; and McCloskey, D., eds. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Newton-Smith, W. The Rationality of Science. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Oldroyd, D. The Arch of Knowledge. New York: Methuen, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, J. “Logical Positivism.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Pedlar, K. Mind over Matter. London: Thames Methuen, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps Brown, E. “The Underdevelopment of Economics.” Economic Journal, 1972, 82, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 6th imp. (rev.). London: Hutchinson, 1972. (First pub. in English, 1959.)
   Google Scholar
• Powers, J. Philosophy and the New Physics. London: Methuen, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Restivo, S. The Social Relations of Physics, Mysticism and Mathematics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, S. Philosophy and Sociology of Science: An Introduction, 2d. ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan, 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. “If Economics Isn’t Science, What Is It?” The Philosophical Forum, 1983, 14, 296–314.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. “What Rosenberg’s Philosophy of Economics Is Not.” Philosophy of Science, 1984, 53, 127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. “Lakatosian Consolations for Economics.” Economics and Philosophy, 1986, 2, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. “Weintraub’s Aims.” Economics and Philosophy, 1987, 3, 143–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. Economics, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Sassower, R. Philosophy of Economics: A Critique of Demarcation. Lanham, MD: University Presses of America, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Hutchinson, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D., ed. Beyond Mechanism: The Universe in Recent Physics and Catholic Thought. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J., and Yeo, R., eds. The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Shapere, D. Reason and the Search for Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. “History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions.” History of Science, 1982, 20, 157–211.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. “Economic History and Economics.” American Economic Review, 1985, 75, 328–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, M. Foundations of Modern Sociology, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman, N. Antipositivist Theories of the Sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Stove, D. Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists. Oxford: Pergamon, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, F., ed. The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2d ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977 (first ed., 1974).
   Google Scholar
• Toruno, M. “Appraisals and Rational Reconstructions of General Competitive Equilibrium Theory.” Journal of Economic Issues, 1988, 22, 127–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. The Philosophy of Science. London: Hutchinson, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. Foresight and Understanding. London: Hutchinson, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. Human Understanding, vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Trigg, R. Understanding Social Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• van Meerhaeghe, M. Economic Theory, 2d rev. ed. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• von Wright, G. Explanation and Understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, A. “The Rise and Fall of Econometrics.” In The Unfinished Agenda, M. Anderson, ed. London: IEA, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. A History of Philosophy. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. “Rosenberg’s ‘Lakatosian Consolations for Economists.’” Economics and Philosophy, 1987, 3, 139–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber, C., and Harrison, R. “The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Storytelling, and Holism.”Journal of Economic Issues, 1978, 12, 61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, P. The Idea of a Social Science. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J., ed. Beyond Positive Economics. Houndsmill, UK: Macmillan, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. “Reflexivity Is the Ethnographer of the Text.” In Knowledge and Reflexivity, S. Woolgar, ed. London: Sage, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Worswick, G. “Is Progress in Economic Science Possible.” Economic Journal, 1972, 82, 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukav, G. The Dancing Wu-Li Masters. Bungay: Flamingo, 1979.
   Google Scholar