References
- Dalziel, P.C. “Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): Solution of ’Pasinetti’s Paradox’—Comment.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1989, 11, 648–653.
- Dalziel, P.C. “A Generalisation and Simplification of the Cambridge Theorem with Budget Deficits.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1991, 15, 287–300.
- Dalziel, P.C. “Does Government Activity Invalidate the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit? A Reconciliation.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1991–92, 14, 225–231.
- Denicolò, V., and Matteuzzi, M. “Public Debt and the Pasinetti Paradox.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1990, 14, 339–344.
- Kaldor, N. “Alternative Theories of Distribution.” Review of Economic Studies, 1955–56, 23, 83–100.
- Meade, J.E. The Theory of International Economic Policy, vol. 1, The Balance of Payments. London: Oxford University Press, 1951.
- Pasinetti, L.L. Growth and Income Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
- Pasinetti, L.L. “Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, March 1989, 13 (1).
- Steedman, I. “The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process.” Economic Journal, 1972, 82, 1387–1395.