Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics

References

• Bairman, E.I. “Publication Rates and Research Productivity in New Zealand University Economics Departments, 1984–88.” Unpublished Paper, Department of Economics, University of Otago, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J.B. “The Social Psychology of Citations.” Canadian Psychological Review, 1978, 19, 158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J.T.; Johnson, M.H.; and Germanis, P. “An Abstract Approach to the Relative Ranking of Economics Journals.” Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 1980, 19, 52–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, S.V. “Increasing the Efficiency of the Economics Journal Market.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1971, 9, 798–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H.R. “Computer-assisted Referee Selection as a Means of Reducing Potential Editorial Bias.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982, 5, 202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, B.B., and Viksnins, G.J. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals: An Alternative Rating System.” Western Economic Journal, 1972, 10, 467–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R.M. “The Effects of Double-blind versus Single-blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review.” American Economic Review, 1991, 81, 1041–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. New Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Broadus, R.N. “The Literature of the Social Sciences: A Survey of Citation Studies.” International Social Science Journal, 1971, 23, 236–243.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, W.C.; Hamelman, P.W.; and Staaf, R.J. “A Quality Index for Economics Journals.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 1974, 56, 123–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cave, M.; Kogan, M.; and Trevett, G. The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. London: Kingsley, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, M., and Hanney, S. “Performance Indicators for Higher Education and Research.” In M. Cave, M. Kogan, and R. Smith (eds.), Output and Performance Measurement in Government: The State of the Art. London: Kingsley, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, E.E., and Sherr, L.A. Quality: Transforming Postsecondary Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 3. Washington, DC: George Washington University, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. Science and Its Fabrication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Chizmar, J.F. “Total Quality Management (TQM) of Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Economic Education, 1994, 25, 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubin, D.E. “On the Use of the Scientific Citation Index in Sociology.” American Sociologist, 1973, 8, 187–191.
   Google Scholar
• Chubin, D.E., and Moitra, S.D. “Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting?” Social Studies of Science, 1975, 5, 423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D.V. “The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-disciplinary Investigation.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991, 14, 119–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, F.R., and Edwards, D.J. “The Origins of the Contributors to the A.E.R. during the Fifties.” American Economic Review, 1960, 50, 1011–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, A.W. “The Role of Scholarly Journals in the History of Economics: An Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1971, 9, 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, C.W., and Douglas, P.H. “A Theory of Production.” American Economic Review, 1928, 18 ( Supplement), 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., and Cole, S. “Measuring the Quality of Sociological Research: Problems in the Use of the Science Citation Index.” American Sociologist, 1971, 6, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S.E. “Comparing the Sciences: Citation Context Analysis of Papers from Neuropharmacology and the Sociology of Science.” Social Studies of Science, 1985, 15, 127–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S.E. “What Do Citations Count? The Rhetoric-first Model.” Scientometrics, 1989, 15, 437–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, D. “The Gatekeepers of Science; Some Factors Affecting the Selection of Articles for Scientific Journals.” American Sociologist, 1967, 2, 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. Invisible Colleges. London: University of Chicago, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. “Agreement and Divergence on Referencing Practice.” Journal of Information Science, 1981a, 3, 27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. “The Need for a Theory of Citing.” Journal of Documentation, 1981b, 37, 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. “Transatlantic Citation Patterns in Educational Psychology.” Education Libraries Bulletin, 1981c, 24, 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. “Norms and Functions in Citation: The View of Journal Editors and Referees in Psychology.” Social Science Information Studies, 1982, 2, 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie, G.G., and Heckel, R.W. “Citation Criteria for Ranking Academic Departments.” Journal of Metals, 1976, 28, 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, A.L., and De Lorme, C.D., Jr. “Some Empirical Evidence on the Variables Associated with the Rating of Economics Journals.” Southern Economic Journal, 1976, 43, 1149–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P., and Papanek, G.F. “Faculty Ratings of Major Economics Departments by Citations.” American Economic Review, 1984, 74, 225–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, E.V., and Durden, G.C. “Why Economists Rank Their Journals the Way They Do.” Journal of Economics and Business, 1991, 43, 265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., ed. Quality Assurance for University Teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, D.W., and Fogg, L. “But the Reviewers Are Making Different Criticisms of My Paper! Diversity and Uniqueness in Peer Review.” American Psychologist, 1990, 45, 591–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Fusfeld, D.R. “The Program of the American Economic Association Meetings.” American Economic Review, 1956, 46, 642–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. “Citation Frequency as a Measure of Research Activity and Performance.” Current Contents, January 31, 1973, 5, 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. Citation Indexing–Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: Wiley, 1979a.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. “Is Citation Analysis a Legitimate Evaluation Tool?” Scientometrics, 1979b, 1, 359–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrity, D.M., and McKenzie, R.B. “The Ranking of Southern Economics Departments: New Criterion and Further Evidence.” Southern Economic Journal, 1978, 45, 608–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G.N. “Referencing as Persuasion.” Social Studies of Science, 1977, 7, 113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M.D. “The Role of Referees in Scientific Communication.” In J. Hartley (ed.), The Psychology of Written Communication. London: Kogan Page, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, P.E.; Marchand, J.R.; and Thompson, R. “Economics Departmental Rankings: Research Incentives, Constraints, and Efficiency.” American Economic Review, 1982, 72, 1131–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamermesh, D. “Facts and Myths about Refereeing.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8, 153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamermesh, D.; Johnson, G.D.; and Weisbrod, B.A. “Scholarship, Citation and Salaries: Economic Rewards in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal, 1982, 49, 472–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad, S., ed. Peer Commentary on Peer Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, G.T. “Research Output in Australian University Economics Departments, 1974-83.” Australian Economic Papers, 1988, 27, 102–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G.T. “Research Performance Indicators in Australian University Economics Departments, 1986-87.” Economic Analysis and Policy, 1990, 20, 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.G.; Ritter, L.S.; and Walter, I. “What Economists Think of Their Journals.” Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81, 1017–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, B.T.; Austin, R.; Brooks, J.; and Moore, J.B. “Economics Departmental Rankings: Comment.” American Economic Review, 1984, 74, 822–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, T.D. “Economics Departmental Rankings: Comment.” American Economic Review, 1984, 74, 827–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingelfinger, F.J. “Peer Review in Biomedical Publication.” American Journal of Medicine, 1974, 56, 686–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnes, G. “Research Performance Indications in the University Sector.” Higher Education Quarterly. 1988, 42, 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Johnes, G. “Measures of Research Output: University Departments of Economics in the U.K., 1984–8.” Economic Journal, 1990, 100, 556–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A.A., and Davis, R.B. “The Research Productivity of Academic Materials Scientists.” Journal of Metals, 1975, 27, 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, P., and Rothwell, M. Performance Indicators in the Public Sector. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Klamer, A., and Colander, D. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N. “An Evaluation of 50 ‘Ranked’ Economics Departments–By Quantity and Quality of Faculty Publications and Graduate Student Placement and Research Success.” Southern Economic Journal, 1985a, 52, 216–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N. “Publishing Favoritism: A Critique of Department Rankings Based on Quantitative Publishing Performance.” Southern Economic Journal, 1985b, 52, 510–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N. “Measuring the Relative Impact of Economics Book Publishers and Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1990a, 28, 655–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N. “Is There Value-added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990b, 105, 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N., and Piette, M.J. “The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals 1970–1990.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1994a, 32, 640–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N., and Piette, M.J. “Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors.” Journal of Political Economy, 1994b, 102, 194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laband, D.N., and Sophocleus, J.P. “Revealed Preferences for Economics Journals: Citations as Dollar Votes.” Public Choice, 1985, 46, 317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landreth, H., and Colander, D.C. History of Economic Theory, 2d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, S.J., and Palmer, J.P. “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1984, 22, 77–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, D. The Scientific Publication System in Social Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, D. “Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship.” Social Studies of Science, 1980, 10, 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipetz, B.A. “Improvement in the Selectivity of Citation Indexes to Science Literature through the Inclusion of Citation Relationship Indicators.” American Documentation, 1965, 16, 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, M.C. “The Production of Economic Literature: An Interpretation.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1973, 11, 27–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, C.C. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals Revisited.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 1975, 15, 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J.M., and Amacher, R.C. “Economic Value of an In-house Editorship.” Public Choice, 1986, 48, 101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin, J.L., and Outreville, J.F. “The Relative Impact of Economics Journals: A Cross-Country Survey and Comparison.” Journal of Economics and Business, 1987, 39, 267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyn, J. “Progress in Documentation: Citation Analysis.” Journal of Documentation, 1975, 32, 390–397.
   Google Scholar
• Medoff, M.H. “The Ranking of Economists.” Journal of Economic Education, 1989, 20, 405–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A.C., and Punsalan, V.J. Refereed and Nonrefereed Economic Journals. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G.A. Psychology: The Science of Mental Life. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Moed, H. “The Use of Bibliometric Data as Tools for University Research Policy.” International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 1985, 9, 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, R.P., and Kowalski, G.S. “Refereed Journals and Professional Respectability.” International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 1979, 16, 154–167.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, W.J. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals: A Suggested Rating System.” Western Economic Journal, 1972, 10, 156–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, M.J. “Citation Context Classification of a Citation Classic Concerning Citation Context Classification.” Social Studies of Science, 1988, 18, 515–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, M.J., and Murugesan, P. “Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations.” Social Studies of Science, 1975, 5, 86–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugesan, P., and Moravcsik, M.J. “Variations in the Nature of Citation Measures with Journals and Scientific Specialties.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 29, 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth, J.F. “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.” Econometrica, 1961, 29, 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, A.W. “Journal Publication Performance during 1970-74: The Relative Output of Southern Economics Departments.” Southern Economic Journal, 1975, 42, 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, D.P., and Ceci, S.J. “Peer Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles Submitted Again.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982, 5, 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A.L. “Citation Analysis: Queries and Caveats.” Social Studies of Science, 1977, 7, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, R. “Comments on Citation Study of Materials Science Departments.” Journal of Metals, 1976, 28, 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J.J. “The Publishing of Economic Papers and Its Impact on Graduate Faculty Ratings, 1960–1969.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1972, 10, 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeels, J.W., and Taylor, R.A. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals: An Alternative Rating System.” Western Economic Journal, 1972, 10, 470–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H.G. “Cited Documents as Concept Symbols.” Social Studies of Science, 1978, 8, 327–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V.K., and Gold, S. “Alternative Views of Journal Publication Performance during 1968–71 and 1970–74.” Eastern Economics Journal, 1976, 3, 109–113.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G.J., and Friedland, C. “The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics.” Journal of Political Economy, 1975, 83, 477–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliacozzo, R. “Self-citations in Scientific Literature.” Journal of Documentation, 1977, 33, 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg, R. Understanding Social Science. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Voos, H., and Dagaev, K.S. “Are All Citations Equal? Or, Did We Op. Cit. Your Idem?” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1976, 1, 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M.W. “Chance and Interrater Agreement on Manuscripts.” American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 796–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D.S. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Methods of Assessing Quality.” Change, 1981, 13, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M. “Citation Indexes.” Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 1971, 5, 16–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wert, C.A. “The Citation Index Revisited.” Journal of Metals, 1975, 27, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, R., and Resnick, S. Economics: Marxian versus Neo-classical. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Yotopoulos, P.A. “Institutional Affiliation of the Contributors to Three Professional Journals.” American Economic Review, 1961, 51, 665–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H., and Merton, R.K. “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System.” Minerva, 1971, 89, 66–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar