Intellectual Progress and Academic Economics: Rational Choice and Game Theory

References

• Aumann, R. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications vols. 1 and 2. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. A History of Modern Economic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. Truth and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. “The Economic Approach to Human Behavior.” In J. Elster (ed.), Rational Choice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, pp. 108–122.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. “Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101 (3), 385–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beed, C., and Beed, C. “A Christian Perspective on Neoclassical Rational Choice Theory.” International Journal of Social Economics, 1999, 26 (4), 501–520.
   Google Scholar
• Beed, C., and Kane, O. “What Is the Critique of the Mathematization of Economics?” Kyklos, 1991, 44(4), 581–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T., and Bagnoli, M. “Courtship as a Waiting Game.” Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101 (1), 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. “A Theory of Conformity.” Journal of Political Economy, 1994, 102 (5), 841–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. The Methodology of Economics, 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. “Why I Am Not a Constructivist.” In R. Backhouse (ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 109–136.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. “Progress and Anti-progress in Economic Science.” In M. Barazini and R. Scazzieri (eds.), Foundations of Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, pp. 363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Boulier, B., and Goldfarb, R. “Pisces Economicus: The Fish as Economic Man.” Economics and Philosophy, 1991, 7 (1), pp. 83–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. “Progress in Behavioral Game Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, 11 (4), 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney, T., and Hogan, D. “Marriage in an Institutionalized Life Course: First Marriage among American Men in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1991, 53 (1), 178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K.; Markovits, A.; and Platt, J., eds. Advances in the Social Sciences 1900–1980. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Donnerstein, M., and Donnerstein, E., eds. Social Psychology. Dubuque: Brown, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, B.; Mookherjee, D.; Parthasarathy, T.; Raghavan, T.; Ray, D.; and Tijs, S., eds. Game Theory and Economic Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Eichberger, J. Game Theory for Economists. San Diego: Academic Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F. “Games Economists Play: A Noncooperative View.” RAND Journal of Economics, 1989, 20 (1), 113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. Game Theory with Applications to Economics. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J. Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz, J.; Richard, J.; and Wolsey, L., eds. Economic Decision-Making. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. “An Introduction to Applicable Game Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, 11 (1), 127–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D., and Shapiro, I. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gull, F. “A Nobel Prize for Game Theorists: The Contributions of Harsanyi, Nash and Selten.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, 11 (3), 159–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. “The Problem of Excess Content: Economics, Novelty and a Long Popperian Tale.” and “Reply.” In N. de Marchi and M. Blaug (eds.), Appraising Economic Theories. Aldershot, UK: Elgar, 1991, pp. 58–75, 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. Testing, Rationality, and Progress. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S., and Varoufakis, Y. Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S., and Neyman, A., eds. Game and Economic Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptmann, E. Putting Choice Before Democracy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. “Explanatory Progress in Economics.” Social Research, 1989, 56 (2), 361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. “How Not to Criticize Rational Choice Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1996, 26(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, E. “Has Economics Progressed? Rectilinear, Historicist, Universalist, and Evolutionary Historiographies.” History of Political Economy, 1995, 27 (1), 43–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, H. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, P. The Rule of the Road. New York: Greenwood, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lay, M. Ways of the World. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Leontieff, W. “Theoretical Assumptions and Non-observed Facts.” American Economic Review, 1971, 61 (1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, R., and McMillan, J. “Analyzing the Airwaves Auction.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1996, 10 (1), 159–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclntyre, L. Laws and Explanation in the Social Sciences: Defending a Science of Human Behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, R., and Tuma, N. “Entry into Marriage and Parenthood by Young Men and Women: The Influence of Family Background.” Demography, 1985, 22 (4), 515–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehan, E. Economics and Policymaking: The Tragic Illusion. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. “Social Influence and Conformity.” In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 3d ed. New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 347–412.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G., and La Manna, M., eds. The New Industrial Economics. Aldershot, UK: Elgar, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Peltzman, S. “The Handbook of Industrial Organization: A Review Article.” Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99 (1), 201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivzi, S. “Game Theory to the Rescue?” Contributions to Political Economy, 1994, 13, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. “Lakatosian Consolations for Economists.” Economics and Philosophy, 1986, 2 (1), 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. Economics—Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A., and Sotomayor, M. 1992. “Two-Sided Matching.” In R. Aumann and S. Hart (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 1. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1992, pp. 485–541.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A., ed. Game Theory in Economics. Aldershot, UK: Elgar, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A. “John Nash: The Master of Economic Modelling.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1995, 97 (1), 9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, J. Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Satz, D., and Ferejohn, J. “Rational Choice and Social Theory.” Journal of Philosophy, 1994, 91 (2), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K.; Ellis, B.; Beed, C.; and Sankey, H. “Meta-economic Principles.” Paper delivered to American Philosophical Association Conference, Los Angeles, March 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach., 2d ed. London: Routledge, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sciulli, D. “Weaknesses in Rational Choice Theory’s Contribution to Comparative Research.” In J. Coleman and T. Fararo (eds.), Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D.; Peplau, L.; and Taylor, S. Social Psychology 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C. “The Theory of Business Strategy.” RAND Journal of Economics, 1989, 20(1), 125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shubik, M. Game Theory in the Social Sciences: Concepts and Solutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, M., and Steinmetz, S., eds. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.; Peplau, L.; and Sears, D. Social Psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann-Margalit, E. The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Young, H. “The Economics of Convention.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1996, 10 (2), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar