Long-run convergence in a neo-Kaleckian open-economy model with autonomous export growth

References

• Allain, O. “Tackling the Instability of Growth: A Kaleckian–Harrodian Model with an Autonomous Expenditure Component.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2015, 39 (5), 1351–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaduri, A., and Marglin, S. “Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1990, 14 (4), 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blecker, R.A. “International Competition, Income Distribution and Economic Growth.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1989, 13 (3), 395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Kaleckian Macro Models for Open Economies.” In J. Deprez and J.T. Harvey (eds.), Foundations of International Economics: Post Keynesian Perspectives. London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 116–150.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “Open Economy Models of Distribution and Growth.” In E. Hein and E. Stockhammer (eds.), A Modern Guide to Keynesian Macroeconomics and Economic Policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011, pp. 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Bortis, H. Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory: A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Caserta, M. “The Steady-State Model of Capital Utilisation: A Comment.” Studi Economici, 1990, 41 (2), 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cesaratto, S. “Neo-Kaleckian and Sraffian Controversies on the Theory of Accumulation.” Review of Political Economy, 2015, 27 (2), 154–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committeri, M. “Some Comments on Recent Contributions on Capital Accumulation, Income Distribution and Capacity Utilization.” Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 1986, 2 (2), 161–186.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts, K., and Norman, N. “Post-Keynesian Approaches to Industrial Pricing: A Survey and Critique.” In G. C. Harcourt and P. Kriesler (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 443–466.
   Google Scholar
• De Juan, O. “Hidden Links in the Warranted Rate of Growth: The Supermultiplier Way Out.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2016. doi:10.1080/09672567.2016.1186201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duménil, G. and Lévy, D. “A Reply to Amitava Dutt: The Role of Aggregate Demand in the Long Run.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2014, 38 (5), 1285–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. K. “Stagnation, Income Distribution and Monopoly Power.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1984, 8 (1), 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Growth and Distribution with Exogenous Autonomous Demand Growth and Normal Capacity Utilization.” Mimeo, Notre Dame University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, F., and Serrano, F. “Growth Rate and Level Effects: The Stability of the Adjustment of Capacity to Demand and the Sraffian Supermultiplier.” Review of Political Economy, 2015, 27 (3), 258–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, E. Distribution and Growth After Keynes: A Post Keynesian Guide. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, E., and Vogel, L. “Distribution and Growth Reconsidered: Empirical Results for Six OECD Countries.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2008, 32 (3), 479–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. “The Case for Regional Policies.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1970, 17 (3), 337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “Convergence Towards the Normal Rate of Capacity Utilization in Neo-Kaleckian Models: The Role of Non-capacity Creating Autonomous Expenditures.” Metroeconomica, 2016, 67 (1), 172–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Prototypes, Reality, and the Growth Rate of Autonomous Consumption Expenditures: A Rejoinder.” Metroeconomica, 2017, 68(1): 194–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. L., and Thirlwall, A. P. Economic Growth and the Balance-of-Payments Constraint. London: Macmillan, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Nah, W. J., and Lavoie, M. “Long Run Convergence in Neo-Kaleckian Open Economy Model with Autonomous Export Growth.” Post-Keynesian Economics Study Group working paper 1604, 2016 (available at www.postkeynesian.net/downloads/working-papers/PKWP1604_Y57A0kM.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Nikiforos, M. “On the Utilisation Controversy: A Theoretical and Empirical Discussion of the Kaleckian Model of Growth and Distribution.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2016, 40 (2), 437–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onaran, Ö., and Galanis, G. “Is Aggregate Demand Wage-led or Profit-led? National and Global Effects.” Working Paper no. 40, 2012. Conditions of Work and Employment Series.
   Google Scholar
• Rowthorn, B. “Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth.” Thames Papers in Political Economy, 1981 (Autumn), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, F. “Long Period Effective Demand and the Sraffian Supermultiplier.” Contributions to Political Economy, 1995a, 14, 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “The Sraffian Multiplier.” Ph.D. diss., Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge, 1995b.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. Structuralist Macroeconomics: Applicable Models for the Third World. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Thirlwall, A.P. “The Balance of Payments Constraint as an Explanation of International Growth Rate Differences.” Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 1979, 32 (128), 45–53.
   Google Scholar