Verdoorn’s law and productivity dynamics: An empirical investigation into the demand and supply approaches

References

• Amable, B. “Catch Up and Convergence: A Model of Cumulative Growth.” International Review of Applied Economics, 1993, 7 (1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Angeriz, A.; McCombie, J. S. L.; and Roberts, M. “New Estimates of Returns to Scale and Spatial Spillovers of EU Regional Manufacturing, 1986–2002.” International Regional Science Review, 2008, 31 (1), 62–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Increasing Returns and the Growth of Industries in the EU Regions: Paradoxes and Conundrums”, Spatial Economic Analysis, 2009, 4 (2), 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and Bond, S. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies, 1991, 58, 277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. (NBER), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962, pp. 609–626.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., and Lee, J. “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010.” Journal of Development Economics, 2012 (available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.001)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. “Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth, 1997, 2 (1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brundell, R., and Bond, S. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 1998, 87, 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, J., and Cornwall, W. “A Demand and Supply Analysis of Productivity Growth.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2002, 13, 203–229.
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. K. “Aggregate Demand, Aggregate Supply and Economic Growth.” International Review of Applied Economics, 2006, 20 (3), 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. “Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, 32 (3), 1147–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., and Verspagen, B. “Technology-gaps, Innovation-diffusion and Transformation: An Evolutionary Interpretation.” Research Policy, 2002, 31, 1291–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe, J., and McCombie, J. S. L. The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change: “Not Even Wrong.” Camberley, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. I. D., and Liu, A. “Verdoorn’s Law and Increasing Returns to Scale: Country Estimates Based on the Cointegration Approach.” Applied Economics Letters, 1999, 6, 29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R.; Hwang, J.; and Rodrik, D. “What You Export Matters.” Journal of Economic Growth, 2007, 12 (1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heston, A.; Summers, R.; and Aten, B. “Penn World Table Version 7.1”, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. “Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth.” In F. A. Lutz and D. C. Hague (eds.), The Theory of Capital. London: Macmillan, 1961, pp. 177–222.
   Google Scholar
• ———. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal, 1972, 82 (328), 1237–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Economic Growth and the Verdoorn Law: A Comment on Mr. Rowthorn’s Article.” Economic Journal, 1975, 85, 891–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “What’s New About the New Economic Geography?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14 (2), 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22 (1), 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N. G.; Romer, D.; and Weil, D. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107, 407–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. L. “Economic Growth, Kaldor’s Laws and the Static-Dynamic Verdoorn Law Paradox.” Applied Economics, 1982, 14, 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Increasing Returns and the Manufacturing Industries: Some Empirical Issues.” Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 1985, 53 (1), 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “Increasing Returns and the Verdoorn Law from a Kaldorian Perspective.” In J. S. L. McCombie M. Pugno and B. Soro (eds.), Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays in Verdoorn’s Law. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp. 64–114.
   Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. L., and de Ridder, J. R. “Increasing Returns, Productivity, and Output Growth: The Case of the United States.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1983, 5 (3), 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “The Verdoorn Law Controversy: Some Empirical Evidence Using U.S. State Data.” Oxford Economic Papers, 1984, 36, 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. L., and Roberts, M. “Returns to Scale and Regional Growth: The Static-Dynamic Verdoorn Law Paradox Revisited.” Journal of Regional Science, 2007, 47 (2), 179–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. L., and Spreafico, M. R. M. “Kaldor’s ‘Technical Progress Function’ and the Verdoorn Law Revisited.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2016, 40 (6), 1117–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oi, W. Y. “Labor as a Quasi-fixed Factor.” Journal of Political Economy, 1962, 70 (6): 538–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma, G. “Four Sources of De-industrialization and a New Concept of ‘Dutch Disease.’” In J. A. Ocampo (ed.), Beyond Reforms: Structural Reforms and Macroeconomic Vulnerability. Washington, DC: ECLAC, 2005, pp. 71–116.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. “Unconditional Convergence in Manufacturing.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, 128 (1), 165–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. “Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94 (5), 1002–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Endogenous Technical Change.” Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5), S71–S102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowthorn, R. E. “What Remains of Kaldor’s Law?” Economic Journal, 1975a, 85, 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “A Reply to Lord Kaldor’s Comment.” Economic Journal, 1975b, 85, 897–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, W. E. G. Productivity and Technological Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Setterfield, M. Rapid Growth and Relative Decline: Modelling Macroeconomic Dynamics with Hysteresis.” London: Macmillan, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, 70 (1), 65–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, T. W. “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation.” Economic Record, 1956, 32 (2), 33–361.
   Google Scholar
• UNIDO. Industrial Statistics Database 2-Digit Level ISIC Revision 3 (INDUSTAT2). Vienna, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• ———. Industrial Development Report. Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. Vienna, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Verdoorn, P. J. “Fattori che Regolano lo Sviluppo della Produttivita’ del Lavoro.” L’Industria, 1949, 1, 3–10. English translation by A. P. Thirlwall, in J. S. L. McCombie, M. Pugno, and B. Soro (eds.), Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays in Verdoorn’s Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp. 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal, 1928, 38 (152), 527–542.
   Google Scholar