Endogenous business cycles and Harrodian instability in an agent-based model

References

• Allain, O. 2015. “Tackling the Instability of Growth: A Kaleckian-Harrodian Model with an Autonomous Expenditure Component.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (5):1351?1371. doi:10.1093/cje/beu039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio, A., D. Lang, and S. Charles. 2012. “Post Keynesian Modeling: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going to?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 34 (3):393–412. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477340301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio, A. 2008. “Destabilizing Competition and Institutional Stabilizers The Contribution of J.M. Keynes”. halshs-00332381, CEPN Working Papers. HAL. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cepnwp:halshs-00332381.
   Google Scholar
• Assenza, T., D. Delli Gatti, and J. Grazzini. 2015. “Emergent Dynamics of a Macroeconomic Agent Based Model with Capital and Credit.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 50:5–28. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi, F., and D. Lang. 2015. “Investment Hysteresis and Potential Output: A Post-Keynesian–Kaleckian Agent-Based Approach.” Economic Modelling, Special Issue on Recent Developments in Decision-Making, Monetary Policy and Financial Markets , 52:35–49. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2015.06.022
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, C. 1997. Agent-Based Keynesian Economics; Methodological Issues and a Model. Society for Computational Economics.20 https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf7/20.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, E., and M. Silvestri. 2013. “Hyman P. Minsky’s Unorthodox Approach: Recent Advances in Simulation Techniques to Develop His Theoretical Assumptions.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 36 (2):299–324. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477360206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordonnier, L., and F. Van de Velde. 2009. ‘Le Capitalisme Est-Il in Trinséquement Instable?? Formes de Capitalisme et Dynamique Économique. Mimeo. Presented at Séminaire Hétérodoxies du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1. http://ces.univ-paris1.fr/membre/seminaire/heterodoxies/Pdf/VanDeVeldeOct09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cottin-Euziol, E., and L.-P. Rochon. 2013. “Circuit with Multi-Period Credit.” Review of Political Economy 25:461–75. doi:10.1080/09538259.2013.807672
   Google Scholar
• Dallery, T. 2010. Le Divorce Rentabilité/croissance Dans Le Capitalisme Financiarisé. Changements de Régimes, Équilibres, Instabilités et Conflits. PhD. diss., University of Lille 1.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. 1996. “Reality and Economic Theory.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 18 (4):479–508. doi:10.1080/01603477.1996.11490083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, R. K., and R. S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., G. Fagiolo, and A. Roventini. 2006. “An Evolutionary Model of Endogenous Business Cycles.” Computational Economics 27 (1):3–34. doi:10.1007/s10614-005-9014-2
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., G. Fagiolo, and A. Roventini. 2010. “Schumpeter Meeting Keynes: A Policy-Friendly Model of Endogenous Growth and Business Cycles.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Computational Perspectives in Economics and Finance: Methods, Dynamic Analysis and Policy Modeling 34:1748–67.. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2010.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazzari, S. M., P. E. Ferri, E. G. Greenberg, and A. M. Variato. 2013. “Aggregate Demand, Instability, and Growth.” Review of Keynesian Economics 1 (1):1–21. doi:10.4337/roke.2013.01.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri, P., S. Fazzari, E. Greenberg, and A. Variato. 2011. “Aggregate Demand, Harrod’s Instability and Fluctuations.” Computational Economics 38:209–20. doi:10.1007/s10614-011-9277-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, S. C. 2011. “Uncertainty and Production Planning.” In Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, edited by Karl G. Kempf, Pınar Keskinocak, and Reha Uzsoy, vol. 151, 83–101. Springer US: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, H. 2009. “Solow’s 1956 Contribution in the Context of the Harrod-Domar Model.” History of Political Economy 41 (Suppl 1):67–87. doi:10.1215/00182702-2009-017
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1939. “An Essay in Dynamic Theory.” The Economic Journal 49 (193):14. doi:10.2307/2225181
   Google Scholar
• Hein, E. 2017. “The Bhaduri–Marglin Post-Kaleckian model in the History of Distribution and Growth Theories: An Assessment by Means of Model Closures.” Review of Keynesian Economics 5:218–38. doi:10.4337/roke.2017.02.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, E., M. Lavoie, and T. van Treeck. 2012. “Harrodian Instability and the “Normal Rate” of Capacity Utilization in Kaleckian Models of Distribution and Growth—a Survey.” Metroeconomica 63:139–69. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. E. 2012. The Microfoundations Delusion: Metaphor and Dogma in the History of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna Dutt, A., S. Charles, and D. Lang. 2015. “Employment Flexibility, Dual Labour Markets, Growth, and Distribution.” Metroeconomica 66 (4):771–807. doi:10.1111/meca.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2014. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham, UK; Norothampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2017. “The Origins and Evolution of the Debate on Wage-Led and Profit-Led Regimes.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 14:200–21. doi:10.4337/ejeep.2017.02.04
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M., and W. A. H. Godley. 2012. Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 1962. Economic Philosophy. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Seppecher, P. 2009. Un Modèle Macroéconomique Multi-Agents Avec Monnaie Endogène. GREQAM Working Papers halshs-00370716 HAL. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00370716
   Google Scholar
• Seppecher, P. 2012. “Flexibility of Wages and Macroeconomic Instability in an Agent-Based Computational Model with Endogenous Money.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 16:284–97. doi:10.1017/S1365100511000447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppecher, P. 2014. Pour Une Macroéconomie Monétaire Dynamique Et Complexe. Revue De La Régulation. Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs. doi:10.4000/regulation.10977. http://regulation.revues.org/10977
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. 1969. Decision Order and Time in Human Affairs. 2d ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1976. “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality.” In 25 Years of Economic Theory, edited by T. J. Kastelein, S. K. Kuipers, W. A. Nijenhuis, and G. R. Wagenaar, 65–86. Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Skott, P. 2010. “Growth, Instability and Cycles: Harrodian and Kaleckian Models of Accumulation and Income Distribution.” In Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, edited by M. Setterfield, 108–31. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Skott, P. 2012. “Theoretical and Empirical Shortcomings of the Kaleckian Investment Function.” Metroeconomica 63:109–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04111.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfatsion, L., and K. L. Judd. 2006. Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics. vol. 2, Amsterdam; Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A.. 1975. A Theory of Profits. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar