Rich and ever richer? Differential returns across socioeconomic groups

References

• Alvaredo, F., L. Chancel, T. Piketty, E. Saez, and G. Zucman. 2017. “Global Inequality Dynamics: New Findings from WID world.” American Economic Review 107 (5):404–409. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20171095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, L., L. E. Calvet, and P. Sodini. Forthcoming. “Rich Pickings? Risk, Return, and Skill in Household Wealth.” American Economic Review.
   Google Scholar
• Balestra, P., and M. Baranzini. 1971. “Some Optimal Aspects in a Two Class Growth Model with a Differentiated Interest Rate.” Kyklos 24 (2):240–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1971.tb00808.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranzini, M., and A. Mirante. 2013. “The Cambridge Post-Keynesian School of Income and Wealth Distribution.” In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics: Volume 1 Theory and Origins, edited by G. C. Harcourt and P. Kriesler. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa-Filho, N. H., and L. Taylor. 2006. “Distributive and Demand Cycles in the US Economy – A Structuralist GoodwinModel.” Metroeconomica 57 (3):389–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2006.00250.x.
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, W. C., and J. Tobin. 1968. “Pitfalls in Financial Model Building.” The American Economic Review 58 (2):99–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., and A. Rezai. 2016. “Personal Income Inequality and Aggregate Demand.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (2):491–505. doi: 10.1093/cje/beu085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darity, W. A. 1981. “The Simple Analytics of Neo-Ricardian Growth and Distribution.” The American Economic Review 71 (5):978–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. K. 1984. “Stagnation, Income Distribution, and Monopoly Power.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 8 (1):25–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECB. 2014. Household Finance and Consumption Survey. second wave. Brussels: European Central Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ederer, S., and M. Rehm. 2019. “Will Wealth Become More Concentrated in Europe? Evidence from a Calibrated Neo-Kaleckian Model.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 44 (1):55–72. doi: 10.1093/cje/bez014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederer, S., and M. Rehm. 2020. “Making Sense of Piketty’s "Fundamental Laws" in a Postkeynesian Framework: The Transitional Dynamics of Wealth Inequality.” Review of Keynesian Economics 8 (2):195–219. doi: 10.4337/roke.2020.02.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R., and J. Goldthorpe. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagereng, A., L. Guiso, D. Malacrino, and L. Pistaferri. 2018. “Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth.” CESifo Working Paper 7107. Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Fazi, E., and N. Salvadori. 1981. “The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor Model of Growth and Distribution.” Kyklos 34 (4):582–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1981.tb01207.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley, W., and M. Lavoie. 2007. “Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit.” In Money, Income, Production and Wealth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, K. L. 1977. “On the Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and the Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution.” Journal of Economics and Statistics 192 (1):68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J., M. Rehm, and A. Naqvi. 2016. “Different But Equal? Classes, Wealth, and Perceptions in Europe.” AK Working Paper 160.
   Google Scholar
• Jordà, Ò., K. Knoll, D. Kuvshinov, M. Schularick, and A. M. Taylor. 2018. “The Rate of Return on Everything 1870–2015.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 134 (3):1225–1298. doi:10.1093/qje/qjz012.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R. F. 1959. “Exercises in the Analysis of Growth.” Oxford Economic Papers 11 (2):143–156. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040820.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1955. “Alternative Theories of Distribution.” The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2):83–100. doi: 10.2307/2296292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalecki, M. 1937. “A Theory of the Business Cycle.” The Review of Economic Studies 4 (2):77–97. doi: 10.2307/2967606.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936. 1973e. “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.” In The Collected Writings, edited by J. M. Keynes, Vol. VII. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, K. 2016. “Our Home in Days Gone By: Housing Markets in Advanced Economies in Historical Perspective.” Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, K., M. Schularick, and T. M. Steger. 2017. “No Price like Home: Global House Prices, 1870–2012.” American Economic Review 107 (2):331–352. doi: 10.1257/aer.20150501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kregel, J. A. 1985. “Hamlet without the Prince: Cambridge Macroeconomics without Money.” The American Economic Review 75 (2):133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M., M. Schularick, and U. Steins. Forthcoming. “Income and Wealth Inequality in America, 1949–2016.” Journal of Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori. 2010. “The Post-Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution: A Survey.” In Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, edited by M. Setterfield. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, N. 1969. “Two Notes on Pasinetti’s Theorem.” Economic Record 45 (3):373–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1969.tb00177.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschi, A. 1974. “The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution.” The Review of Economic Studies 41 (1):149–150. doi: 10.2307/2296405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marglin, S. A., and A. Bhaduri. 1990. “Profit Squeeze and Keynesian Theory.” In The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Postwar Experience, edited by S. A. Marglin and J. B. Schor, 153–186. Clarendon: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. J. 1974. “The Pasinetti Paradox Revisited.” The Review of Economic Studies 41 (2):297–299. doi: 10.2307/2296719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. 1957. “The Principle of Circular and Cumulative Causation.” In Rich Lands and Poor: The Road to World Prosperity. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 2012. “Wealth and Wealth Distribution in the Neo-Kaleckian Growth Model.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 34 (3):453–574. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160-3477340304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 2017. “Inequality and Growth in Neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge Growth Theory.” Review of Keynesian Economics 5 (2):146–169. doi: 10.4337/roke.2017.02.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. L. 1962. “Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth.” The Review of Economic Studies 29 (4):267–279. doi: 10.2307/2296303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. L. 1974. Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. L. 1983. “Conditions of Existence of a Two Class Economy in the Kaldor and More General Models of Growth and Income Distribution.” Kyklos 36 (1):91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. 1976. “The Pasinetti Paradox in a Two-Class Monetary Growth Model.” Journal of Monetary Economics 2 (3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(76)90025-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm, M., and M. Schnetzer. 2015. “Property and Power: Lessons from Piketty and New Insights from the HFCS.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 12 (2):204–19. doi: 10.4337/ejeep.2015.02.06.
   Google Scholar
• Saez, E., and G. Zucman. 2016. “Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2):519–578. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A., and F. Modigliani. 1966. “The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models.” The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4):269–301. doi: 10.2307/2974425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockhammer, E., O. Onaran, and S. Ederer. 2008. “Functional Income Distribution and Aggregate Demand in the Euro Area.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (1):139–59. doi: 10.1093/cje/ben026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockhammer, E., and S. Ederer. 2008. “Demand Effects of the Falling Wage Share in Austria.” Empirica 35 (5):481–502. doi: 10.1007/s10663-008-9069-0.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., O. Omer, and A. Rezai. 2015. “Wealth Concentration, Income Distribution, and Alternatives for the USA.” Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series 17.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. 1969. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1 (1):15–29. doi: 10.2307/1991374.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamparelli, L. 2017. “Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy.” Metroeconomica 68 (4):927–46. doi: 10.1111/meca.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar