Closest target for the orientation-free context-dependent DEA under variable returns to scale

References

• Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2010). A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Optimization, 59(7), 985–996.10.1080/02331930902878333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Chen, H., Xiong, B., Wu, J., & Liang, L. (2017). Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern. Omega, 73, 49–59.10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Pang, Z., Chen, H., & Liang, L. (2015). Closest targets in environmental efficiency evaluation based on enhanced Russell measure. Ecological Indicators, 51, 59–66.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Borras, F., Ortiz, L., & Pastor, J. T. (2014). Benchmarking in healthcare: An approach based on closest targets. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 215, 67–91.10.1007/978-3-662-43437-6
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., & Pastor, J. T. (2013). A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(17), 9142–9154.10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., & Pastor, J. T. (2014). On how to properly calculate the Euclidean distance-based measure in DEA. Optimization, 63(3), 421–432.10.1080/02331934.2012.655692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 209–218.10.1007/s11123-007-0039-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, C., & Lee, J. D. (2009). The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the least-distance measure. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(1–2), 265–275.10.1016/j.mcm.2008.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17(1), 35–44.10.1016/0377-2217(84)90006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brissimis, S. N., & Zervopoulos, P. D. (2012). Developing a step-by-step effectiveness assessment model for customer-oriented service organizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(1), 226–233.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockett, P. L., Rousseau J. J., Wang, Y., & Zhow, L. (1997). Implementation of DEA models using GAMS (Research Report 765). Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, H., Lu, Y. C., & Chung, J. T. (2010a). Improved slack-based context-dependent DEA–A study of international tourist hotels in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6452–6458.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, H., Lu, Y. C., & Chung, J. T. (2010b). Assurance region context-dependent DEA with an application to Taiwanese hotel industry. International Journal of Operational Research, 8(3), 292–312.10.1504/IJOR.2010.033541
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Morita, H., & Zhu, J. (2005). context-dependent dea with an application to Tokyo public libraries. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4(03), 385–394.10.1142/S0219622005001635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. H., & Wu, M. F. (2010). Performance evaluation of international tourism hotels in Taiwan-Application of context-dependent DEA. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 48(3), 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. R., & Green, R. H. (1991). Comparing products using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 19(6), 631–638.10.1016/0305-0483(91)90012-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., & Anouze, A. L. (2010). Data envelopment analysis with classification and regression tree–a case of banking efficiency. Expert Systems, 27(4), 231–246.10.1111/exsy.2010.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, F. X., & Harker, P. T. (1999). Projections onto efficient frontiers: Theoretical and computational extensions to DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(3), 275–300.10.1023/A:1007746205433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo, G. R., Vakili, J., & Mirdehghan, S. M. (2012). Using the minimum distance of DMUs from the frontier of the PPS for evaluating group performance of DMUs in DEA. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 29(02), 10–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. (2012). Context-dependent data envelopment analysis with cross-efficiency evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(1), 38–46.10.1057/jors.2011.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., Bae, H., & Lee, L. H. (2011). A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7665–7673.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893–902.10.1016/j.omega.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfia, F. H., & Esmaeilib, M. (2008). On FDH context-dependent data envelopment analysis. Mathematical Sciences, 2(4), 391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Morita, H., Hirokawa, K., & Zhu, J. (2005). A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis. Omega, 33(4), 357–362.10.1016/j.omega.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Bae, H., & Lim, S. (2012). Stepwise benchmarking path selection in DEA. In intelligent decision technologies (pp. 477–484). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-29920-9
   Google Scholar
• Piot-Lepetit, I., Perrigot, R., & Cliquet, G. (2013). Impact of the industry on franchise chain efficiency: A meta-DEA and context-dependent DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(11), 1692–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2003). Context-dependent data envelopment analysis – Measuring attractiveness and progress. Omega, 31(5), 397–408.10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00080-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. J., & Yu, S. J. (2010). Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 568–580.10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva Portela, M. C. A., Borges, P., & Thanassoulis, E. (2003). Finding closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: The case of convex and non-convex technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2/3), 251–269.10.1023/A:1022813702387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K. A. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, S. S., & Chen, Y. F. (2013). Facilitating benchmarking with strategic grouping and data envelopment analysis: The case of international tourist hotels in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 18(5), 518–533.10.1080/10941665.2012.695283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179–1189.10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucan, A., & Atıcı, K. B. (2010). Efficiency evaluations with context-dependent and measure-specific data envelopment approaches: An application in a World Bank supported project. Omega, 38(1-2), 68–83.10.1016/j.omega.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Liang, L. (2009). Fuzzy context-dependent data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 1(3), 211–223.10.1504/IJDATS.2009.024293
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., Chen, B., Xia, Q., & Zhou, H. (2013). Ranking and benchmarking of the Asian games achievements based on DEA: The case of Guangzhou 2010. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 30(06), 8–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., & Yue, W. (2008, December). Coned context DEA model with application to mutual funds evaluation. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEM 2008. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 805–809).10.1109/IEEM.2008.4737981
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Wu, J., Ji, X., & Li, F. (2017). A simple MILP to determine closest targets in non-oriented DEA model satisfying strong monotonicity. Omega. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar