Modelling undesirable outputs in multiple objective data envelopment analysis

References

• Banker, R.D., & Morey, R.C. (1986). Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research, 34(4), 513–521.10.1287/opre.34.4.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, Y., & Yang, F. (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1909–1917.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Ferguson, R.O. (1955). Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science, 1(2), 138–151.10.1287/mnsc.1.2.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 91–107.10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, Y.C., Lan, L.W., & Yen, B.T. (2010). A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 477–489.10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Park, K.S., & Pastor, J.T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(1), 5–42.10.1023/A:1007701304281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2003). Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 1070–1074.10.1111/1467-8276.00510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(1), 242–245.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00191-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2009). A comment on weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 535–538.10.1111/ajae.2009.91.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Tyteca, D. (1996). An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms – application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18(2), 161–175.10.1016/0921-8009(96)00019-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C.K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90–98.10.2307/1928055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, E.G., & Lins, M.E. (2008). Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(5), 616–623.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, A. (2003). Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 1075–1077.10.1111/1467-8276.00511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, A., & Veeman, T.S. (2001). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 605–616.10.1111/ajae.2001.83.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, F.S., & Lieberman, G.J. (2005). Introduction to operations research (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGrw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, P.J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 437–446.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00180-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077–1082.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2005). Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 59–72.10.1162/108819805775247846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T., & Podinovski, V. (2009). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 539–545.10.1111/ajae.2009.91.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Fang, K., Yang, W., Wang, D., & Hong, X. (2013). Regional environmental efficiency evaluation in China: Analysis based on the Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1018–1031.10.1016/j.mcm.2012.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Li, X.B., & Reeves, G.R. (1999). A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 507–517.10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00130-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, L., Cook, W.D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55(7), 643–653.10.1002/nav.v55:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiloo, M., Jafarzadeh, A.H., Saen, R.F., Tatham, P., & Fisher, R. (2016). A multiple criteria approach to two-stage data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 317–327.10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiloo, M., Saen, R.F., & Lee, K.H. (2015). Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: An extension and application of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 279–289.10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiloo, M., Tavana, M., Saen, R.F., & Noorizadeh, A. (2014). A game theoretic approach to modeling undesirable outputs and efficiency decomposition in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 244, 479–492.10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J., & Cordeiro, J.J. (2009). Investigating technical and ecological efficiencies in the electricity generation industry: Are there win-win opportunities? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(9), 1160–1172.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M.L., Zhang, L.L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’energy efficiency based on small sample data. Applied Energy, 112, 1049–1055.10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4465–4469.10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2010). Should the US clean air act include CO 2 emission control?: Examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5902–5911.10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2011). Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3), 684–693.10.1016/j.ejor.2010.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Wei, Y.M., & Zhang, X. (2012). A comparative analysis of China’s regional energy and emission performance: Which is the better way to deal with undesirable outputs? Energy Policy, 46, 574–584.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Q., & Yan, H. (2004). Congestion and returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(3), 641–660.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00799-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., Du, S., Liang, L., & Zhou, Y. (2013). A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1095–1101.10.1016/j.mcm.2012.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., Zhang, D., Chen, B., & Yang, M. (2017). Allocation of emission permits based on DEA and production stability. Information Systems and Operational Research, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., An, Q., Xiong, B., & Chen, Y. (2013). Congestion measurement for regional industries in China: A data envelopment analysis approach with undesirable outputs. Energy Policy, 57, 7–13.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., & Pollitt, M. (2009). Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), 1095–1105.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Bi, J., Fan, Z., Yuan, Z., & Ge, J. (2008). Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach. Ecological Economics, 68(1), 306–316.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar