Productivity growth in network models: An application to banking during the financial crisis

References

• Akther, S., Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2013). Estimating two-stage network Slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking. Omega, 41, 88–96.10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R., & Thanassoulis, E. (2004). Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 363–379.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00175-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, S., & Chen, C.-M. (2016). Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model. Omega, 58, 139–153.10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, J. E. (1990). Comparing university departments. Omega, 18, 171–183.10.1016/0305-0483(90)90064-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, J. E. (1995). Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 441–452.10.1057/jors.1995.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A., & Humphrey, D. (1992). Measurement and efficiency issues in commercial banking. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), Output measurement in service sectors, National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth (Vol. 56, pp. 245–300). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, S. A., Førsund, F. R., & Jansen, E. S. (1992). Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980–89. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 211–228.10.2307/3440261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.10.2307/1913388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1170–1176.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Hababou, M., & Tuenter, H. J. H. (2000). Multicompetent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: An application to scales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 14, 209–224.10.1023/A:1026598803764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J., Strahan, P. E., & Tehranian, H. (2011). Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 297–312.10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, R., & Sapriza, H. (2014). Sovereign debt crises (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion Papers No. 1104).
   Google Scholar
• De Haas, R., & Van Horen, N. (2013). Running for the exit? International bank lending during a financial crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 244–285.10.1093/rfs/hhs113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degl’Innocenti, M., Kourtzidis, S. A., Sevic, Z., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2016). Investigating bank efficiency in transition economies: A window-based weight assurance region approach. Economic Modelling. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2016.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degl’Innocenti, M., Kourtzidis, S. A., Sevic, Z., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2017). Bank productivity growth and convergence in the European Union during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 184–199.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Detragiache, E., & Gupta, P. (2006). Inside the crisis: An empirical analysis of banking systems in distress. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 702–718.10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Liang, L., Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2010). A bargaining game model for measuring performance of the two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 390–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1988). Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 563–576.10.1057/jors.1988.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Bank for Restructuring and development. (2015). Chapter 1: Rebalancing finance and boosting investment (Transition Report 2015–2016: Rebalancing Finance). London.
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank. (2010, July). The impact of the financial crisis on the Central and Eastern European countries. Monthly Bulletin.
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank. (2011, June). Fiscal developments. Monthly Bulletin.
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1992). Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes. The Economic Journal, 102, 158–160.10.2307/2234861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Intertemporal production frontiers: With dynamic DEA. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-1816-0
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1992b). Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 58–101.
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1994a). Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications (pp. 253–272). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994b). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Karagiannis, G. (2017). The denominator rule for share-weighting aggregation. European Journal of Operational Research, 260, 1175–1180.10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Zelenyuk, V. (2003). On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. European Journal of Operational Research, 146, 615–620.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00259-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiordelisi, F., Galloppo, G., & Ricci, O. (2014). The effect of monetary crisis innervations on interbank markets, equity indices and G-SIFIs during financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 11, 49–61.10.1016/j.jfs.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, K. J. (2012). Problems with (dis)aggregating productivity and another productivity paradox. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37, 249–259.10.1007/s11123-011-0250-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, H., & Matousek, R. (2011). Efficiency of Turkish banking: Two-stage network system. Variable returns to scale model. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 21, 75–91.10.1016/j.intfin.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2010). A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega, 38, 398–409.10.1016/j.omega.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galagedera, D. U. A., Watson, J., Premachandra, I. M., & Chen, Y. (2016). Modeling leakage in two-stage DEA models: An application to US mutual fund families. Omega, 61, 62–77.10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosskopf, S. (2003). Some remarks on productivity and its decompositions. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 459–474.10.1023/A:1027364119672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEA models. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19, 1–16.10.1016/j.sorms.2013.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2015). Weight assurance region in two-stage additive efficiency decomposition DEA model: An application to school data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66, 696–704.10.1057/jors.2014.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, M. C.-H., Liu, J. S., Lu, W.-M., & Huang, C.-C. (2013). A new perspective to explore the technology transfer efficiencies in US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 247–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holod, D., & Lewis, H. (2011). Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2801–2810.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivashina, V., & Scharfstein, D. (2010). Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008. Journal of Financial Economics, 97, 319–338.10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, R., Peydró, J. L., da-Rocha-Lopes, S., & Schoar, A.. (2014). Interbank liquidity crunch and the firm credit crunch: Evidence from the 2007–2009. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 347–372.10.1093/rfs/hht056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Russell, R. R. (2002). Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: Relative contributions to growth and convergence. American Economic Review, 92, 527–548.10.1257/00028280260136381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., & Lu, W.-M. (2012). Network-based method for ranking of efficient units in two-stage DEA models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 1153–1164.10.1057/jors.2011.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. A. K. (2003). The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 437–458.10.1023/A:1027312102834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. (2003). Evaluation the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 56, 627–635.10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00293-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209–242.10.1007/BF03006863
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., Nath, P., & Pal, M. (2003). Resource, service quality and performance triad: A framework for measuring efficiency of banking service. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 723–735.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V., & Athanassopoulos, A. D. (1998). Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units using DEA models with weight restrictions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 500–508.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, S., & Desli, E. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment. American Economic Review, 87, 1033–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45, 1270–1288.10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shephard, R. W. (1953). Cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production frontier functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., & Allen, R. (1998). Simulating weights restriction in data envelopment analysis by means of unobserved DMUs. Management Science, 44, 586–594.10.1287/mnsc.44.4.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., & Allen, R. (2012). Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis under variable returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 218, 175–185.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., Portela, M., & Allen, R. (2004). Incorporating value judgments in DEA. In W. W. Cooper, L. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 99–138). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., Portela, M., & Despic, O. (2008). The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In H. Fried, K. Lovell, & S. Schmidt (Eds.), Measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth (pp. 251–421). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, E., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93–108.10.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. H., Gopal, R. D., & Zionts, S. (1997). Use of data envelopment in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 191–213.10.1023/A:1018977111455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (1999). Technical progress, inefficiency and productivity change in U.S. banking, 1984–1993. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 31, 212–234.10.2307/2601230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y.-H. B., & Beasley, J. E. (1990). Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41, 829–835.10.1057/jors.1990.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Wu, D., Liang, L., Bi, G., & Wu, D. D. (2011). Supply chain DEA: Production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Annals of Operations Research, 185, 195–211.10.1007/s10479-008-0511-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenyuk, V. (2006). Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 1076–1086.10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha, Y., & Liang, L. (2010). Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 332–338.10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar