182
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Determination of an efficient variables sampling system based on the Taguchi process capability index

&
Pages 420-432 | Received 22 Mar 2017, Accepted 12 Feb 2018, Published online: 20 Mar 2018

References

  • Arizono, I., Kanagawa, A., Ohta, H., Watakabe, K., & Tateishi, K. (1997). Variable sampling plans for normal distribution indexed by Taguchi's loss function. Naval Research Logistics, 44(6), 591–603.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750
  • Arizono, I., Miyazaki, T., & Takemoto, Y. (2013). Variable sampling inspection plans with screening indexed by Taguchi’s quality loss for optimizing average total inspection. International Journal of Production Research, 52(2), 405–418.
  • Aslam, M., Azam, M., & Jun, C.-H. (2013). Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41(2), 340–346.
  • Aslam, M., Azam, M., & Jun, C. H. (2015). Various repetitive sampling plans using process capability index of multiple quality characteristics. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 31(6), 823–835.10.1002/asmb.2110
  • Aslam, M., Azam, M., & Jun, C. H. (2016). Multiple dependent state repetitive group sampling plan for Burr XII distribution. Quality Engineering, 28(2), 231–237.10.1080/08982112.2015.1068331
  • Aslam, M., Wu, C.-W., Azam, M., & Jun, C.-H. (2013). Variables sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(3), 667–675.10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.048
  • Baillie, D. H. (1992). Double sampling plans for inspection by variables when the process standard deviation is unknown. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 9(5), 59–70.
  • Balamurali, S. (2003). Bootstrap confidence limits for short-run capability indices. Quality Engineering, 15(4), 643–648.10.1081/QEN-120018395
  • Balamurali, S., & Jun, C. H. (2006). Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics, 33(3), 327–338.10.1080/02664760500446010
  • Balamurali, S., & Jun, C. H. (2007). Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on the measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1221–1230.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
  • Balamurali, S., Jun, C.-H., & Il-Gyo, C. (2008). A new hybrid reliability sampling system for exponential lifetime distributions. Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 16(3), 365–375.
  • Balamurali, S., & Jun, C. H. (2009). Designing of a variables two-plan system by minimizing the average sample number. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(10), 1159–1172.10.1080/02664760802562514
  • Balamurali, S., & Kalyanasundaram, M. (2002a). Construction of a generalized robust Taguchi capability index. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29(7), 967–971.10.1080/0266476022000006676
  • Balamurali, S., & Kalyanasundaram, M. (2002b). Bootstrap lower confidence limits for the process capability indices Cp, Cpk and Cpm. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 19(8/9), 1088–1097.10.1108/02656710210442875
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2012a). Optimal designing of a variables quick switching variables sampling system by minimizing the average sample number. Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 19(3), 295–310.
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2012b). Variables quick switching system with double specification limits. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 19(2), Article ID: 1250008, 1–17.
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2013). A new failure censored sampling system for weibull distribution. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 9(1), 3–12.
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2014). Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index Cpk. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 31(2), 85–94.10.1080/21681015.2014.893929
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2015). Optimal designing of variables sampling plan for resubmitted lots. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 44(5), 1210–1224.10.1080/03610918.2013.810256
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2017a). Developing and designing of an efficient sampling system based on process capability index. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87(7), 1401–1415.10.1080/00949655.2016.1267735
  • Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2017b). Designing of variables modified chain sampling plan based on process capability index with unknown mean and variance. American Journal Mathematical and Management Sciences, 36(4), 363–377.10.1080/07474946.2016.1275459
  • Boyles, R. A. (1991). The Taguchi Capability Index. Journal of Quality Technology, 23(1), 17–26.
  • Bruhn-Suhr, M., & Krumbholz, W. (1990). A new variable sampling plan for normally distributed lots with unknown standard deviation and double specification limits. Statistical Papers, 31(1), 195–207.10.1007/BF02924690
  • Chan, L. K., Cheng, S. W., & Spring, F. A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology, 30(3), 162–175.
  • Dodge, H. F. (1967). A dual system of acceptance sampling ( Technical Report No.16). New Brunswick, NJ: The Statistics Center, Rutgers – The State University.
  • Duarte, B. P., & Saraiva, P. M. (2010). An optimization based framework for designing acceptance sampling plans by variables for nonconforming proportions. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 27(7), 794–814.10.1108/02656711011062390
  • Duarte, B. P., & Saraiva, P. M. (2013). Optimal design of acceptance sampling plans by variables for nonconforming proportions when the standard deviation is unknown. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation., 42(6), 1318–1342.10.1080/03610918.2012.665548
  • Duncan, A. J. (1986). Quality control and industrial statistics (5th ed.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
  • Fallah Nezhad, M. S., & Seifi, S. (2016). Designing different sampling plans based on process capability index. International Journal of Engineering (IJE), Transactions B: Applications, 29(8), 1120–1130.
  • Fallah Nezhad, M. S., & Seifi, S. (2017). Repetitive group sampling plan based on process capability index for the lot acceptance problem. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87(1), 29–41.10.1080/00949655.2016.1189553
  • Govindaraju, K., & Balamurali, S. (1998). Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics, 25(1), 103–109.10.1080/02664769823331
  • Govindaraju, K., & Ganesalingam, S. (1997). Sampling inspection for resubmitted lots. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 26(3), 1163–1176.10.1080/03610919708813433
  • Hsiang, T. C., & Taguchi, G. (1985). A tutorial on quality control and assurance - the Taguchi methods. Paper Presented at the Annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Las Vegas, NV.
  • Itay, N., Yisrael, P., & Edna, S. (2009). Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk. Quality Engineering, 21(3), 306–318.10.1080/08982110902873597
  • Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18(1), 41–52, Corrigenda p. 265.
  • Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (1993). Process capability indices. London: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-4465-8
  • Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (2002). Process capability indices – A review, 1992–2000. Journal of Quality Technology, 34(1), 1–19.
  • Kotz, S., & Lovelace, C. (1998). Process capability indices in theory and practice. London: Arnold.
  • Leung, B., Cheng, S., & Yeung, A. (2003). A bibliography of process capability papers. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19(5), 445–460.
  • Lin, P. C., & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Testing manufacturing performance based on capability index Cpm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(3–4), 351–358.10.1007/s00170-004-2182-8
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to statistical quality control (6th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pearn, W. L., & Wu, C. W. (2006). Variables sampling plans with PPM fraction of defectives and process loss consideration. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(4), 450–459.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602013
  • Pearn, W. L., & Wu, C. W. (2007). An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega, 35(1), 12–21.10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.018
  • Pearn, W. L., Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(3), 216–231.
  • Pearn, W. L., Lin, G. H., & Chen, K. S. (1998). Distributional and inferential properties of process accuracy and process precision indices. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 27(4), 985–1000.10.1080/03610929808832139
  • Romboski, L. D. (1969). An investigation of quick switching acceptance sampling systems ( PhD Dissertation). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers – The State University.
  • Schilling, E. G. (1982). Acceptance sampling in quality control. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
  • Sommers, D. J. (1981). Two-point double variables sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology, 13(1), 25–30.
  • Spiring, F., Leung, B., Cheng, S., & Yeung, A. (2003). A bibliography of process capability papers. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19(5), 445–460.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1638
  • Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to quality engineering. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organisation.
  • Tomohiro, R., Arizono, I., & Takemoto, Y. (2016). Proposal of variable sequential sampling plan having desired operating characteristics indexed by quality loss. International Journal of Production Research, 54(19), 5742–5760.10.1080/00207543.2016.1173249
  • Wu, C. W. (2012). An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(1), 116–122.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.023
  • Wu, C. W., Aslam, M., & Jun, C. H. (2012). Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(3), 560–566.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.042
  • Wu, C. W., Chen, J. C., & Wu, T. H. (2015). A flexible sampling scheme for variables inspection with loss consideration. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(18), 3766–3777.10.1080/00949655.2015.1022781
  • Wu, C. W., Lee, A. H. I., & Chen, Y. W. (2016). A novel lot sentencing method by variables inspection considering multiple dependent state. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), 985–994.10.1002/qre.v32.3
  • Wu, C. W., Lee, A. H. I., Liu, S. W., & Shih, M. H. (2017). Capability-based quick switching sampling system for lot disposition. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 52, 131–144. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.07.050
  • Wu, C. W., & Liu, S. W. (2014). Developing a sampling plan by variables inspection for controlling lot fraction of defectives. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(9), 2303–2310.10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.043
  • Wu, C. W., Liu, S. W., & Lee, A. H. I. (2015). Design and construction of a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process yield. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 9(6), 819–838.10.1504/EJIE.2015.074382
  • Wu, C. W., & Pearn, W. L. (2008). A variables sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(2), 549–560.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.032
  • Wu, C. W., & Wang, Z. H. (2017). Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss. International Journal of Production Research, 55(8), 2351–2364.10.1080/00207543.2016.1244360
  • Wu, C. W., Wu, T. H., & Chen, T. (2015). Developing a variables repetitive group sampling scheme by considering process yield and quality loss. International Journal of Production Research, 53(7), 2239–2251.10.1080/00207543.2014.986300
  • Yen, C. H., Chang, C. H., & Aslam, M. (2015). Repetitive variable acceptance sampling plan for one-sided specification. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(6), 1102–1116.10.1080/00949655.2013.862791
  • Yum, B. J., & Kim, K. W. (2011). A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000-2009. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27(3), 251–268.10.1002/qre.v27.3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.