Structuring organisational information analysis through Viable System Model knowledge domains

References

• Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2002). Managing viable knowledge. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(3), 223–241.10.1002/sres.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackoff, R. (1981). Creating the corporate future. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh, A., Darivandi, K., & Fathi, E. (2012). Diagnosing, simulating and improving business process using cybernetic laws and the viable system model: The case of a purchasing process. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 66–86.10.1002/sres.v29.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1979). The heart of enterprise. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(1), 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the system. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.10.1257/aer.91.2.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braa, K., & Vidgen, R. (1995). Action case: Exploring the middle kingdom in information systems research methods. Proceedings of Computers in Context, 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Braa, K., & Vidgen, R. (1999). Interpretation, intervention, and reduction in the organizational laboratory: A framework for in-context information system research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9, 25–47.10.1016/S0959-8022(98)00018-6
   Google Scholar
• Britton, G., & Parker, J. (1993). An explication of the viable system model for project management. Systems Practice, 6(1), 21–51.10.1007/BF01059678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, S., Framinan, J., Bruccoleri, M., Barbosa-Povoa, A., & Relvas, S. (2015). The effect of inventory record inaccuracy in information exchange supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 243, 120–129.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnall, C., & Roebuck, C. (2015). Strategic leadership development: Building world-class performance. London: Palgrave.10.1007/978-1-137-41501-1
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Kautz, K., & Abrahall, R. (2014). Reframing success and failure of information systems: A performative perspective. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 561–588.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion, D., Stowell, F., & O’Callaghan, A. (2005). Client-led information system creation (CLIC): Navigating the gap. Information Systems Journal, 15(3), 213–231.10.1111/isj.2005.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, systems and information systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland, D. (1999). Project management: Strategic design and implementation. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, R. (2009). Environmental scanning and scenario planning: A 12 month perspective on applying the viable systems model to developing public sector foresight. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(4), 249–274.10.1007/s11213-009-9127-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. California: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, S., Ibrahim, R., Selamet, A., & Sani, S. (2013). Diagnosis of key performance indicators delivery process using viable system model. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7(13), 64–85.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., Ababneh, B., Hall, M., & Shaw, D. (2009). Knowledge management: A review of the field and of OR's contribution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(1), S114–S125.10.1057/jors.2008.168
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R., & Watt, J. (1979). Management information systems: A system for design. Cybernetics and Systems, 9(3), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (1980). Cybernetic praxis in government: The management of industry in Chile 1970–1973. Cybernetics and Systems, 11, 325–338.10.1080/01969728008960243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (1989a). P.M. manufacturers: The VSM as a diagnostic tool. In R. Espejo & R. Harnden (eds.), The viable system model (pp. 103–120). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (1989b). A cybernetic method to study organizations. In R. Espejo & R. Harnden (eds.), The viable system model (pp. 361–382). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (1990). The viable system model. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 3(3), 219–221.
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (1992). Cyberfilter: A management support system. Executive information systems and decision support (Holtham, C., Ed.). London: Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (1993). Strategy, structure and information management. Information Systems Journal, 3, 17–31.10.1111/j.1365-2575.1993.tb00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. (2015). Performance for viability: Complexity and variety management. Kybernetes, 44(6/7), 1020–1029.10.1108/K-02-2015-0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, R., Bowling, D., & Hoverstadt, P. (1999). The viable system model and the Viplan software. Kybernetes, 28(6/7), 661–678.10.1108/03684929910282944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, R., & Gill, A. (1997). The viable system model as a framework for understanding organizations. Phrontis & SYNCHO. Retrieved March 4, 2016, from http://www.phrontis.com/syncho/V1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flood, R., & Jackson, M. (1991). Creative problem solving. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, R., & Zambuni, S. (1990). Viable systems diagnosis. 1. Application with a major tourism services group. Systems Practice, 3(3), 225–248.10.1007/BF01062730
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C., & Larson, E. (2008). Project management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. In R. Meyers (ed.), Encyclopedia of physical science & technology (Vol. 4, pp. 155–170). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildbrand, S., & Bodhanya, S. (2015). Guidance on applying the viable system model. Kybernetes, 44(2), 186–201.10.1108/K-01-2014-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (1988). An appreciation of stafford beer’s ‘viable system’ viewpoint on managerial practice. Journal of Management Studies, 25(6), 557–573.10.1111/joms.1988.25.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Kawalek, P., & Wastell, D.G. (2002). A case study evaluation of the use of the viable system model in information systems development. In Information Systems Evaluation Management (pp. 17–34). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-93177-718-6
   Google Scholar
• Keys, P. (2006). On becoming expert in the use of problems structuring methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 822–829.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, A. (1999). A viable system model: Consideration of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 1. Retrieved March 4, 2016, from http://www.tlainc.com/articl12.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, G., Skov, R., & Abel, K. (1999). Practices that support team learning and their impact on speed to market and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(5), 439–454.10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00071-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, E. (2006). Designing freedom, regulating a nation: Socialist cybernetics in Allende’s Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(3), 571–606.10.1017/S0022216X06001179
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (2007). IT project management: Infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(2), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. (1995). Putting soft OR methods to work: Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(3), 277–293.10.1057/jors.1995.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paucar-Caceres, A., & Pagano, R. (2009). Systems thinking and the use of systemic methodologies in knowledge management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(3), 343–355.10.1002/sres.v26:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheng, L., & Chuan, Q. (2006). Environmental factors and work performance of project managers in the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 24–37.10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Preece, G., Shaw, D., & Hayashi, H. (2013). Using the viable system model (VSM) to structure information processing complexity in disaster response. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 209–218.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, G., Shaw, D., & Hayashi, H. (2015). Application of the viable system model to analyse communications structures: A case study of disaster response in Japan. European Journal of Operational Research, 243, 312–322.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, J., & Basten, D. (2014). Applications of the viable systems model in IS research – A comprehensive overview and analysis. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 4589–4598.
   Google Scholar
• Rios, J. (2010). Models of organizational cybernetics for diagnosis and design. Kybernetes, 39(9/10), 1529–1550.10.1108/03684921011081150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, M. (2006). Design for viable organizations: The diagnostic power of the viable system model. Kybernetes, 35(7/8), 955–966.10.1108/03684920610675012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, M., & Ríos, J. (2008). System dynamics and cybernetics: A synergetic pair. System Dynamics Review, 24(2), 145–174.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Harper, A., Antill, L., & Avison, D. (1985). Information systems definition: The multiview approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., & Yen, H. (2007). A viable systems perspective to knowledge management. Kybernetes, 36(5/6), 636–651.10.1108/03684920710749721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yolles, M. (1999). Management systems. London: Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Yolles, M. (2000). Organisations, complexity, and viable knowledge management. Kybernetes, 29(9/10), 1202–1222.10.1108/03684920010346257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yolles, M. (2005). Organisational intelligence. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 99–114.10.1108/13665620510574496
   Google Scholar