When better quality or higher goodwill can result in lower product price: A dynamic analysis

References

• Acharyya, R. (1998). Monopoly and product quality: Separating or pooling menu? Economics Letters, 61(2), 187–194.10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00173-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S., & Schmutzler, A. (1995). Product and process flexibility in an innovation environment. The Rand Journal of Economics, 26(4), 557–574.10.2307/2556006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagwell, K., & Riordan, M. H. (1991). High and declining prices signal product quality. American Economic Review, 28(1), 224–239.
   Google Scholar
• Caulkins, J. P., Feichtinger, G., Grass, D., Hartl, R. F., Kort, P. M., & Seidl, A. (2015). History-dependence generated by the interaction of pricing, advertising and experience quality (Technical Report Research Report 2015-05).
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E., & Greene, D. P. (1996). Brands’ quality levels, prices, and advertising outlays: Empirical evidence on signals and information costs. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(1), 29–52.10.1016/0167-7187(95)00478-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chand, S., Moskowitz, H., Novak, A., Rekhi, I., & Sorger, G. (1996). Capacity allocation for dynamic process improvement with quality and demand considerations. Operations Research, 44, 964–975.10.1287/opre.44.6.964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. (2011). Dynamic pricing rule and R&D. Economics Bulletin, 31(3), 2229–2236.
   Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. (2012). Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 553–557.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. (2016). Better product quality may lead to lower product price. B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. doi:10.1515/bejte-2015-0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintagunta, P. K. (1993). Investigating the sensitivity of equilibrium profits to advertising dynamics and competitive effects. Management Science, 39(9), 1146–1162.10.1287/mnsc.39.9.1146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintagunta, P. K., & Jain, D. (1992). A dynamic model of channel member strategies for marketing expenditures. Marketing Science, 11(2), 168–188.10.1287/mksc.11.2.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintagunta, P. K., & Rao, V. R. (1996). Pricing strategies in a dynamic duopoly: A differential game model. Management Science, 42(11), 1501–1514.10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giovanni, P. (2011). Quality improvement vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer? European Journal of Operations Research, 208(2), 119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., & Tapiero, C. S. (1998). Quality and the diffusion of innovations. European Journal of Operational Research, 106, 31–38.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00158-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., & Kim, B. (2010). Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(2), 329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., & Erickson, G. (2015). Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1281–1296.10.1057/jors.2014.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, T. (1997). Price signals quality: The case of perfectly inelastic demand. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(1), 43–61.10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fershtman, C., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. (1990). Market share pioneering advantage: A theoretical approach. Management Science, 36(8), 900–918.10.1287/mnsc.36.8.900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, C. (1986). Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Science, 32, 1301–1315.10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, C. (1988). A quality control model with learning effects. Operations Research, 36, 437–444.10.1287/opre.36.3.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. M. (1971). Is there a generalized price-quality relationship? Journal of Marketing Research, 8(2), 241–243.10.2307/3149770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavious, A., & Lowengart, O. (2012). Price-quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 137–161.10.1007/s11002-011-9143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstner, E. (1985). Do higher prices signal higher quality? Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 209–215.10.2307/3151366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosset, L., & Viscolani, B. (2009). Optimal dynamic advertising with an adverse exogenous effect on brand goodwill. Automatica, 45(4), 863–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. C., & Roy, S. (2010). Signaling quality through prices in an oligopoly. Games and Economic Behavior, 68(1), 192–207.10.1016/j.geb.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, G. Z., & Kato, A. (2006). Price, quality, and reputation: Evidence from an online field experiment. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(4), 983–1005.10.1111/(ISSN)1756-2171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, K. L., & Riordan, M. H. (1994). Price and quality in a new product monopoly. Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 773–789.10.2307/2297918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L. (2004). Process and product R&D by a multiproduct monopolist: A reply to Lin. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 745–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2009). Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(4), 508–518.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., & Orsini, R. (2015). Quality improvement and process innovation in monopoly: A dynamic analysis. Operations Research Letters, 43, 370–373.10.1016/j.orl.2015.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., & Zaccour, G. (2015). Inverted-u aggregate investment curves in a dynamic game of advertising. Economics Letters, 132, 34–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karray, S., & Zaccour, G. (2007). Effectiveness of coop advertising programs in competitive distribution channels. International Game Theory Review, 9(2), 151–167.10.1142/S0219198907001333
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., & Rajagopalan, S. (1998). Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Science 44(11-part-1), 1517-1532.10.1287/mnsc.44.11.1517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P. (2004). Process and product R&D by a multiproduct monopolist. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 735–743.10.1093/oep/gpf065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P., & Saggi, K. (2002). Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition. European Economic Review, 46(1), 201–211.10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00090-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G. W., Zhang, J. X., & Tang, W. S. (2015). Strategic transfer pricing in a marketing–operations interface with quality level and advertising dependent goodwill. Omega, 56, 1–15.10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 796–821.10.1086/261408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, K. B., & Dodds, W. B. (1988). A research program for establishing the validity of the price-quality relationship. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 151–168.10.1007/BF02723333
   Google Scholar
• Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301–317.10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, A., & Narasimhan, R. (2006). Dynamics of competing with quality-and advertising-based goodwill. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 462–474.10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlove, M., & Arrow, K. J. (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica, 29, 129–142.10.2307/2551549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oczkowski, E., & Doucouliagos, H. (2015). Wine prices and quality ratings: A meta-regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 103–121.10.1093/ajae/aau057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, S. (2003). Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation when consumers have a preference for product variety. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 50(2), 183–201.10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubel, O., & Zaccour, G. (2007). A differential game of a dual distribution channel. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, 9, 547–568.10.1007/978-0-8176-4553-3
   Google Scholar
• Saha, S. (2007). Consumer preferences and product and process R&D. The Rand Journal of Economics, 38(1), 250–268.10.1111/rand.2007.38.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1987). The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on price. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapiero, C. (1987). Production learning and quality control. IIE Transaction, 19, 362–370.10.1080/07408178708975408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapiero, C. S., Ritchken, P. H., & Reisman, A. (1987). Reliability, pricing and quality control. European Journal of Operational Research, 31(1), 37–45.10.1016/0377-2217(87)90134-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völckner, F., & Hofmann, J. (2007). The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants. Marketing Letters, 18(3), 181–196.10.1007/s11002-007-9013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vörös, J. (2006). The dynamics of price, quality and productivity improvement decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(3), 809–823.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vörös, J. (2013). Multi-period models for analyzing the dynamics of process improvement activities. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(3), 615–623.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolinsky, A. (1983). Prices as signals of product quality. Review of Economic Studies, 50(4), 647–658.10.2307/2297767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2011). Effects of construal level on the price-quality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 376–389.10.1086/659755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., Su, C., & Bao, Y. (2002). A paradox of price–quality and market efficiency: A comparative study of the US and China markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 349–365.10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar