Centralised horizontal cooperation and profit sharing in a shipping pool

References

• Agarwal, R., & Ergun, O. (2010a). Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Operations Research, 58(6), 1726–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Ergun, Ö. (2010b). Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Operations Research, 58(6), 1726–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audy, J.-F., D’Amours, S., & Rousseau, L.-M. (2011). Cost allocation in the establishment of a collaborative transportation agreement-an application in the furniture industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(6), 960–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bektas, T., Repoussis, P., & Tarantilis, C. (2014). Dynamic vehicle routing problems. Toth, P. & Vigo, D. (Eds.), The vehicle routing: problems, methods, and applications (pp. 299–348). MOS-SIAM series on optimization, society for industrial and applied mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B., & Ronen, D. (2013). Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium. European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 467–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson Research Studies. (2004). The tramp shipping market. Retrieved from http://www.pfri.uniri.hr/bopri/documents/Unit26-TRAMPSHIPPINGMARKET_000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cruijssen, F., Cools, M., & Dullaert, W. (2007). Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(2), 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruijssen, F., Dullaert, W., & Joro, T. (2010). Freight transportation efficiency through horizontal cooperation in Flanders. International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications, 13(3), 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergun, O., Kuyzu, G., & Savelsbergh, M. (2007a). Reducing truckload transportation costs through collaboration. Transportation Science, 41(2), 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergun, O., Kuyzu, G., & Savelsbergh, M. (2007b). Shipper collaboration. Computers & Operations Research, 34(6), 1551–1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholt, K., Heimdal, S., & Loktu, A. (2000). Shortest path in the presence of obstacles: An application to ocean shipping. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(6), 683–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisk, M., Göthe-Lundgren, M., Jornsten, K., & Ronnqvist, M. (2010). Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 448–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatica, R. A., & Miranda, P. A. (2011). Special issue on Latin-American research: A time based discretization approach for ship routing and scheduling with variable speed. Networks & Spatial Economics, 11(3, SI), 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guajardo, M., & Jörnsten, K. (2015). Common mistakes in computing the nucleolus. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 931–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralambides, H. E. (1996). The economics of bulk shipping pools. Maritime Policy and Management, 23(3), 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H.-S., Visoldilokpun, S., & Rosenberger, J. M. (2008). A branch-and-price-and-cut method for ship scheduling with limited risk. Transportation Science, 42(3), 336–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsvik, J. E., Fagerholt, K., & Laporte, G. (2010). A tabu search heuristic for ship routing and scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(4), 594–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewska, M. A., Kopfer, H., Laporte, G., Ropke, S., & Zaccour, G. (2008). Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(11), 1483–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D.-Y., & Liu, H.-Y. (2011). Combined ship allocation, routing and freight assignment in tramp shipping. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(4), 414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschler, M., Peleg, B., & Shapley, L. S. (1979). Geometric properties of the kernel, nucleolus, and related solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4(4), 303–338.
   Google Scholar
• Norstad, I., Fagerholt, K., & Laporte, G. (2011). Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies, 19(5, SI), 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özener, O. O., Ergun, O., & Savelsbergh, M. (2011). Lane-exchange mechanisms for truckload carrier collaboration. Transportation Science, 45(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, W.V. (1995). Shipping pools. London: Lloyd’s of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pillac, V., Gendreau, M., Guéret, C., & Medaglia, A. L. (2013). A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaraftis, H. N., & Kontovas, C. A. (2013). Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: A taxonomy and survey. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 26, 331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaraftis, H. N., Wen, M., & Kontovas, C. A. (2016). Dynamic vehicle routing problems: Three decades and counting. Networks, 67(1), 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, J. (2007). New EU regulation on the application of the articles 85 and 86 of the treaty as regards to the maritime transport tramp services competency and pools. In F. X. M. d. Osés & R. R. M. Dauer (Eds.), 5th International Congress on Maritime Technological Innovations and Research (pp. 601–612). Departament de Ciència i Enginyeria Nàutiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, N., & Larsen, O. I. (2010). An application of cooperative game among container terminals of one port. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 393–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. Siam Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17(6), 1163–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoltzi, C., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2011). Horizontal cooperations between logistics service providers: motives, structure, performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(5–6), 552–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, volume II, volume 28 of Annals of Mathematics Studies (pp. 307–317). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherali, H. D., & Lunday, B. J. (2011). Equitable apportionment of railcars within a pooling agreement for shipping automobiles. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(2), 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, D.-W., & Panayides, P. M. (2002). A conceptual application of cooperative game theory to liner shipping strategic alliances. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Tijs, S. H., & Driessen, T. S. (1986). Game theory and cost allocation problems. Management Science, 32(8), 1015–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado, G., & Hvattum, L. M. (2017a). Determining departure times in dynamic and stochastic maritime routing and scheduling problems. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 29(3--4, 553–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado, G., & Hvattum, L. M. (2017b). Improved solutions to dynamic and stochastic maritime pick-up and delivery problems using local search. Annals of Operations Research, 253(2), 825–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado, G., Hvattum, L. M., Fagerholt, K., & Cordeau, J.-F. (2013). Heuristics for dynamic and stochastic routing in industrial shipping. Computers & Operations Research, 40(1), 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, D. (Ed.). (2015). Vehicle routing: Problems, methods and applications, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, M., Ropke, S., Petersen, H. L., Larsen, R., & Madsen, O. B. G. (2016). Full-shipload tramp ship routing and scheduling with variable speeds. Computers & Operations Research, 70, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, P., Macharis, C., Breedam, A. V., Vannieuwenhuyse, B., & Waeyenbergh, G. (2010). Managing information flows in horizontal collaboration for an optimised and more sustainable supply chain performance. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Transportation Resesarch; Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, F., Lu, H., Ding, N., & Liu, J. (2015). Game theory analysis of container port alliance. Journal of Coastal Research, 73(supp 1), 635–640.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Liu, M., & Shi, X. (2011). Verifying liner shipping alliance’s stability by applying core theory. Research in Transportation Economics, 32(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar