Ranking production units by their impact on structural efficiency

References

• Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39, 1261–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmild, M., & Matthews, K. (2012). Multi-directional efficiency analysis of efficiency patterns in Chinese banks 1997–2008. European Journal of Operational Research, 219, 434–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., & Chang, H. (2006). The super efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175, 1311–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Hougaard, J. L. (1999). Efficiency evaluations based on potential (non-proportional) improvements. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12, 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Hougaard, J. L. (2004). Super efficiency evaluation based on potential slack. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briec, W., Dervaux, B., & Leleu, H. (2003). Aggregation of directional distance functions and industrial efficiency. Journal of Economics, 79, 237–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficeincy of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, F., Hougaard, J. L., & Keiding, H. (1999). An axiomatic characterization of efficiency indices. Economics Letters, 63, 33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., & Tone, K. (2007). Envelopment analysis a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dula, J. H., & Hickman, B. L. (1997). Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, 1001–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Zelenyuk, V. (2003). On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. European Journal of Operational Research, 146, 615–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 120, 253–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Førsund, F., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1979). Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: An application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Economic Journal, 89, 294–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiyasi, M. (2016). A DEA production technology and its usage for incorporation of collaboration in efficiency analysis: An axiomatic approach. International Transactions in Operations Research,
   Google Scholar
• Ghiyasi, M., & Hougaard, J. L. (2014). Ranking production units according to marginal efficiency contribution (MSAP WP series no 04/2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hougaard, J. L. (2009). An introduction to allocation rules. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hougaard, J. L., & Keiding, H. (1998). On the functional form of an efficiency index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9, 103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lofti, F., Shoja, N., Tohidi, G., & Razavyan, S. (2004). Ranking using l1-norm in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 153, 215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.-K. (1995). Relations between convexity and homogeneity in multioutput technologies. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24, 311–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.-K., & Cheng, Y.-S. (2007). Solving the puzzles of structural efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 713–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. A. K., & Rouse, A. P. B. (2003). Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdiloozad, M., & Roshdi, I. (2014). Analyzing the concept of super efficeincy in data envelopment analysis: A directional distance function approach. arXiv: 1407.2599.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin, H. (1988). Axioms of cooperative decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mussard, S., & Peypoch, N. (2006). On multi-decomposition of the aggregate Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 91, 436–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradi, J., & Zhu, H. (2013). A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega, 41, 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R. R. (1985). Measures of technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 35, 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R. R. (1990). Continuity of measures of technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 51, 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In R. H. Silkman (Ed.), Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis (pp. 73–105). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28, 307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, R. W. (1953). Cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tone, K. (2001). A slack-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K. (2002). A slack-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvinger, S. (2000). Industry performance and structural efficiency measures: Solutions to problems in firm models. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 164–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar