Explaining choice quality with decision style, cognitive reflection and decision environment

References

• Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the “adaptive toolbox”: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 611–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröder, A. (2012). The quest for take the best—Insights and outlooks from experimental research. In P. Todd, G. Gigerenzer & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world (pp. 216–240). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campitelli, G., & Gerrans, P. (2014). Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A., & Liu, J. (2013). A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika, 78(4), 685–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2012). Decision styles and rationality: An analysis of the predictive validity of the general decision-making style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6), 1053–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewberry, C., Juanchich, M., & Narendran, S. (2013). Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 783–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2016). Behavioural operational research: Returning to the roots of the OR profession. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 791–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/∼gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Su, Y.-S. (2016). arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. (version 1.9-3) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm
   Google Scholar
• Ghaderi, M., Ruiz, F., & Agell, N. (2017). A linear programming approach for learning non-monotonic additive value functions in multiple criteria decision aiding. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(3), 1073–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, J. (2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(2), 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, J. (2016). MCMCglmm course notes. [R package vignette]. Retrieved from http://cran.us.r-project.org/web/packages/MCMCglmm/vignettes/CourseNotes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K., Shih, S.-I., & Mohammed, S. (2016). The development and validation of the rational and intuitive decision styles scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(5), 523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R. M., & Karelaia, N. (2006). “Take-the-best” and other simple strategies: Why and when they work “well” with binary cues. Theory and Decision, 61(3), 205–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juanchich, M., Dewberry, C., Sirota, M., & Narendran, S. (2016). Cognitive reflection predicts real-life decision outcomes, but not over and above personality and decision-making styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(1), 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, P. J., Malo, P., Pajala, T., Ravaja, N., Somervuori, O., & Wallenius, J. (2018). Context matters: The impact of product type, emotional attachment and information overload on choice quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, P. J., Silvennoinen, K., Wallenius, J., & Öörni, A. (2012). Can a linear value function explain choices? An experimental study. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 360–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-W., & Wang, G.-J. (2007). Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 220–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 35(7), 1230–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajala, T., Korhonen, P., & Wallenius, J. (2017). Road to robust prediction of choices in deterministic MCDM. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(1), 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(2), 207–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H. B., Turner, B. M., & Nygren, T. E. (2011). Studies of the dimensionality, correlates, and meaning of measures of the maximizing tendency. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 565–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, J., & Kunz, R. (2016). Developing and validating the multidimensional proactive decision-making scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 864–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. M., Rim, H. B., Betz, N. E., & Nygren, T. E. (2012). The maximization inventory. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. (2016). Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 827–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, N. L., & Highhouse, S. (2014). Do self-reported decision styles relate with others’ impressions of decision quality?. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 224–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., Li, Y., Takagishi, H., Matsumoto, Y., & Kiyonari, T. (2014). In search of Homo economicus. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1699–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar