Profit inefficiency decomposition in a serial-structure system with resource sharing

References

• Agarwal, R., & Ergun, Ö. (2010). Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Operations Research, 58(6), 1726–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirteimoori, A. (2013). A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21(1), 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Meng, F., Xiong, B., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2018a). Assessing the relative efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Annals of Operations Research, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2883-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Wen, Y., Ding, T., & Li, Y. (2018b). Resource sharing and payoff allocation in a three-stage system: Integrating network DEA with the Shapley value method. Omega, In press. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Yang, M., Chu, J., Wu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2017). Efficiency evaluation of an interactive system by data envelopment analysis approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 103, 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Borras, F., Pastor, J. T., & Vidal, F. (2015). Measuring and decomposing firm's revenue and cost efficiency: The Russell measures revisited. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Ortiz, L., & Pastor, J. T. (2017). Measuring and decomposing profit inefficiency through the Slacks-Based Measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 650–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., & Pastor, J. T. (2011). A general input distance function based on opportunity costs. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2011, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., & Ray, S. C. (2013). An overall measure of technical inefficiency at the firm and at the industry level: The “lost profit on outlay”. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(1), 154–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., & Vidal, F. (2016). The weighted additive distance function. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(1), 338–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., & Zofio, J. L. (2015). How to properly decompose economic efficiency using technical and allocative criteria with non-homothetic DEA technologies. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 882–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., & Zofio, J. L. (2017). Can Farrell's allocative efficiency be generalised by the directional distance function approach? European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 345–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Borras, F., Ortiz, L., Pastor, J. T., & Vidal, F. (2017). Luenberger-type indicators based on the weighted additive distance function. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Borras, F., Pastor, J. T., & Zofio, J. L. (2016a). Loss Distance Functions and Profit Function: General Duality Results. In J. Aparicio, C. K. Lovell, & J. T. Pastor (Eds.), Advances in efficiency and productivity (pp. 71–96). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aysan, A. F., Karakaya, M. M., & Uyanik, M. (2011). Panel stochastic frontier analysis of profitability and efficiency of turkish banking sector in the post crisis era. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 12(4), 629–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., & Maindiratta, A. (1988). Nonparametric analysis of technical and allocative efficiencies in production. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society, 56 (6), 1315–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 465–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, L., & Pesenti, R. (2014). Network, shared flow and multi-level DEA models: A critical review. In W. Cook & J. Zhu (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis (pp. 329–376). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimisation Theory and Applications, 98(2), 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Kao, C., & Zhu, J. (2013). Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2010a). Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 138–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Du, J., Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2010b). DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 339–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2010). Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective. Omega, 38(6), 423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Pastor, J. T., Aparicio, J., & Borras, F. (2011a). Decomposing profit inefficiency in DEA through the weighted additive model. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(2), 411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011b). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. In W. Cooper, L. Seiford & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 1–39). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., Wang, T. F., Song, D. W., & Ji, P. (2006). The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(4), 354–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilisation. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despotis, D. K., Sotiros, D., & Koronakos, G. (2016). A network DEA approach for series multi-stage processes. Omega, 61, 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Fukuyama, H., Grosskopf, S., & Zelenyuk, V. (2015). Decomposing profit efficiency using a slack-based directional distance function. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 335–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Fukuyama, H., Grosskopf, S., & Zelenyuk, V. (2016). Cost decompositions and the efficient subset. Omega, 62, 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Margaritis, D. (2011). Coalition formation and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Centrum Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 4(2), 216–223.
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Weber, W. L. (2004). The effect of risk-based cFAPItal requirements on profit efficiency in banking. Applied Economics, 36(15), 1731–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Lovell, C. K., & Grosskopf, S. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, T. T., Juo, J. C., Chiang, H. C., Yu, M. M., & Huang, M. Y. (2016). Risk-based decompositions of the meta profit efficiency of Taiwanese and Chinese banks. Omega, 62, 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, H., & Mirdehghan, S. M. (2012). Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1), 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, D., Liu, S., & Lu, X. (2015). Modelling the impacts of resource sharing on supply chain efficiency. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 14(4), 744–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halická, M., & Trnovská, M. (2018). The Russell Measure Model: computational aspects, duality, and profit efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(1), 386–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEA models. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Juo, J. C., Fu, T. T., Yu, M. M., & Lin, Y. H. (2015). Profit-oriented productivity change. Omega, 57, 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2010). Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 48(3), 437–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S. (2013). Using DEA to find the best partner for a horizontal cooperation. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 66(2), 286–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2010). DEA-based pre-merger planning tool. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(10), 1485–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, C., Li, L., Wang, W., Liu, S., & Bai, Z. (2015). Platform construction of high quality resource sharing system based on large instruments and equipment in colleges and universities. Experimental Technology and Management, 32(3), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, J. T., Lovell, C. K., & Aparicio, J. (2012). Families of linear efficiency programmes based on Debreu’s loss function. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(2), 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portela, M. S., & Thanassoulis, E. (2007). Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(4), 481–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2011). A DEA approach to derive individual lower and upper bounds for the technical and allocative components of the overall profit efficiency. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(11), 1907–1916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M., Emrouznejad, A., & Moreno, P. (2017). A linear relational DEA model to evaluate two-stage processes with shared inputs. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 36(1), 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3), 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 42(1), 124–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahyuni, S., & Pujiharto, P. (2016). Profit efficiency of shariah banks in Indonesia and the determining factors: Using Stochastic frontier analysis method. Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura, 19(2), 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., & Wu, X. (2015). Coming contineous living water: The second stage practice of CERS. Experimental Technology and Management, 32(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Xiong, B., An, Q., Sun, J., & Wu, H. (2017). Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Yu, Y., Zhu, Q., An, Q., & Liang, L. (2018). Closest target for the orientation-free context-dependent DEA under variable returns-to-scale. Journal of the Operational Research Society. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1409865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha, Y., & Liang, L. (2010). Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zofio, J. L., Pastor, J. T., & Aparicio, J. (2013). The directional profit efficiency measure: On why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(3), 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar