Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in imprecise DEA: An extension

Reference

• Arnold, V., Bardhan, I. R., & Cooper, W. W. (1997). A two-stage DEA approach for identifying secondary, and rewarding efficiency in Texas. In W. W. Cooper, S. Thore, D. Gibson, & F. PhiUips (Eds.), Impact: How IC2 institute research affects public policy and business practices. USA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Asosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., & Jamporazmey, M. (2010). Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5931–5938. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghery, M., Yousefi, S., & Mustafa, J. R. (2016). Risk measurement and prioritization of auto parts manufacturing processes based on process failure analysis, interval data envelopment analysis and grey relational analysis. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(8), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazaraa, M. S., Jarvis, J. J., & Sherali, H. D. (2010). Linear programming and network flows (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186. doi:10.1002/nav.3800090303
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Rousseau, J., & Semple, J. (1993). An effective non-Archimedean anti-degeneracy/cycling linear programming method especially for data envelopment analysis and like models. Annals of Operations Research, 46–47(2), 271–278. doi:10.1007/BF02023099
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Du, J., Hu, H., & Zhu, J. (2017). Bounded and discrete data and Likert scales in data envelopment analysis: Application to regional energy efficiency in China. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 347–366. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1827-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Yu, G. (1999). IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science, 45(4), 597–607. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.4.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Yu, G. (2001). IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) with CMDs (Column Maximum Decision Making Units). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(2), 176–181. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). NY, USA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Despotis, D. K., & Smirlis, Y. G. (2002). Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(1), 24–36. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00200-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, B., Rahmani, M., & Ghodsypour, S. H. (2017). A new simulation-based genetic algorithm to efficiency measure in IDEA with weight restrictions. Measurement, 108, 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen, R. (2007). Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 741–747. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Agrell, P. J. (2014). Interval data without sign restrictions in DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(7–8), 2028–2036. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, F., Xu, X., Chen, R., & Zhu, L. (2016). Interval efficiency improvement in DEA by using ideal points. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 87, 138–145. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C. (2006). Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 1087–1099. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E. E., & Dursun, M. (2014). An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 6995–7004. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili-Damghani, K., Tavana, M., & Haji-Saami, E. (2015). A data envelopment analysis model with interval data and undesirable output for combined cycle power plant performance assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), 760–773. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-H., Park, C.-G., & Park, K. S. (1999). An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Computers & Operations Research, 26(1), 59–72. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(98)00041-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. K., Sam Park, K., & Kim, S. H. (2002). Identification of inefficiencies in an additive model based IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis). Computers & Operations Research, 29(12), 1661–1676. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00049-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. S. (2004). Simplification of the transformations and redundancy of assurance regions in IDEA (imprecise DEA). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(12), 1363–1366. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. S. (2007). Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(4), 533–540. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. S. (2010). Duality, efficiency computations and interpretations in imprecise DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 289–296. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V. (2004). Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(12), 1311–1322. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V., & Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2013). Weight restrictions and free production in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 61(2), 426–437. doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V., & Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2017). Solving DEA models in a single optimization stage: Can the non-Archimedean infinitesimal be replaced by a small finite epsilon? European Journal of Operational Research, 257(2), 412–414.
   Google Scholar
• Salahi, M., & Toloo, M. (2017). In the determination of the most efficient decision making unit in data envelopment analysis: A comment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 104, 216–218. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyster, A. L. (1973). Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Operations Research, 21(5), 1154–1157. doi:10.1287/opre.21.5.1154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M. (2014a). Selecting and full ranking suppliers with imprecise data: A new DEA method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 74(5–8), 1141–1148. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M. (2014b). The role of non-Archimedean epsilon in finding the most efficient unit: With an application of professional tennis players. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(21–22), 5334–5346. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M. (2015). A technical note on “erratum to Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated model [Comput. Indus. Eng. 52 (2007) 71-77].”. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 83, 261–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M., Keshavarz, E., & Hatami-Marbini, A. (2018). Dual-role factors for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Omega, 77, 15–31. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M., & Nalchigar, S. (2011). A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14726–14731. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M., Nalchigar, S., & Sohrabi, B. (2018). Selecting most efficient information system projects in presence of user subjective opinions: A DEA approach. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 26(4), 1027–1051. doi:10.1007/s10100-018-0549-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., Greatbanks, R., & Yang, J. B. (2005). Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 153(3), 347–370. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2004.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (2003). Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3), 513–529. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00392-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (2004). Imprecise DEA via standard linear DEA models with a revisit to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Operations Research, 52(2), 323–329. doi:10.1287/opre.1030.0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar