Analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy sorting: An analytic hierarchy process–based method for fuzzy classification in sorting problems

References

• Almeida-Dias, J., Figueira, J., & Roy, B. (2010). Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions. European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 565–580. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida-Dias, J., Figueira, J., & Roy, B. (2012). A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: The Electre Tri-nC method. European Journal of Operational Research, 217, 567–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1037/a0018362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bana e Costa, C. (1996). Les problématiques de l'aide à la décision: Vers l'enrichissement de la trilogie choix–tri–rangement. RAIRO – Operations Research, 30, 191–216. doi: 10.1051/ro/1996300201911
   Google Scholar
• Baraldi, A., & Blonda, P. (1999). A survey of fuzzy clustering algorithms for pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybernet, Part B (Cybernetics), 29, 778–785. doi: 10.1109/3477.809032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, A., Mareschal, B., & de Almeida, A. (2015). Fuzzy FlowSort: An integration of the flowsort method and fuzzy set theory for decision making on the basis of inaccurate quantitative data. Information Sciences, 293, 115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A., & Evans, K. (2017). In A. Leibling, S. Maruna, & L. McAra (Eds.), Crime prevention and community safety. The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed., pp. 797–824). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, K., Dale, M., Edmunds, M., Hough, M., Millie, A., & Wagstaff, M. (2005). Street crime in London: deterrence, disruption and displacement. London: Government Office for London.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., Verdegay, J. L., & Vila, M. A. (1992). Linguistic decision-making models. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 7, 479–492. doi: 10.1002/int.4550070507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., Vila, M. A., & Voxman, W. (1998). On a canonical representation of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 93( 1), 125–135. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00144-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, L., Akpınar, M., Araz, C., & Ilgın, M. (2018). A green supplier evaluation system based on a new multi-criteria sorting method: VIKORSORT. Expert Systems with Applications, 114, 479–487. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, E., Figueira, J., Navarro, J., & Roy, B. (2017). ELECTRE TRI-nB: A new multiple criteria ordinal classification method. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(1), 214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. (2016). Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: A case illustration involving service suppliers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67, 339–376. doi: 10.1057/jors.2015.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T. (2002). Causes of delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Gordon, M. (2017). MACBETHSort: A multiple criteria decision aid procedure for sorting strategic products. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68 (1), 53–61. doi: 10.1057/s41274-016-0002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14336–14345. [CrossRef][https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Lolli, F., Balugani, E., Cavallieri, R., & Gamberini, R. (2018). DEASort: Assigning items with data envelopment analysis in ABC classes. International Journal of Production Economics, 199, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & López, C. (2018). Cost-benefit AHPSort for performance analysis of offshore providers. International Journal of Production Research: Online Advance Production, 1. doi: 10.1080/00207543.00202018.01509393
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2014). Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT. Omega, 47, 45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., & Pearman, C. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 4767–4784. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2012.657966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 151–164. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krejčí, J., & Ishizaka, A. (2018). FAHPSort: A fuzzy extension of the AHPSort method. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17, 1119–1145. doi: 10.1142/S0219622018400011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Martinez, L., Wang, H., Rodriguez, R. M., & Novozhilov, V. (2010). Computing with words in risk assessment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3, 396–419. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2010.9727710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lolli, F., Ishizaka, A., & Gamberini, R. (2014). New AHP-based approaches for multi-criteria inventory classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 156, 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lolli, F., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., Rimini, B., Balugani, E., & Prandini, L. (2017). Requalifying public buildings and utilities using a group decision support system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1081–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). GAHPSort: A new group multi-criteria decision method for sorting a large number of the cloud-based ERP solutions. Computers in Industry, 92–93, 12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. (2007). Sensory evaluation based on linguistic decision analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44, 148–164.[https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.006]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). An overview of the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges. Information Sciences, 207(0 ), 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L., Ruan, D., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Wang, P. P. (2009). Linguistic decision making: Tools and applications. Information Sciences, 179, 2297–2298. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccoli, F., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Sorting municipalities in Umbria according to the risk of wolf attacks with AHPSort II. Ecological Indicators, 73, 741–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemery, P., Ishizaka, A., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2012). Enriching descriptive information in ranking and sorting problems with visualizations techniques. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7, 130–147. doi: 10.1108/17465661211242778
   Google Scholar
• Nemery, P., & Lamboray, C. (2008). FlowSort: A flow-based sorting method with limiting or central profiles. TOP, 16( 1), 90–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ONS (2017). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending June 2017. Retrieved 2 November, 2017, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/june2017.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance i: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, D. J. (2012). Crime and planning: Building socially sustainable communities. Chicago: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrycz, W. (2005). Knowledge-based clustering (pp. 1–27). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrycz, W., Ekel, P., & Parreiras, R. (2011). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: Models, Methods and Applications. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, R. M., Labella, Á., & Martínez, L. (2016). An overview on fuzzy modelling of complex linguistic preferences in decision making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9( suppl. 1), 81–94. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2016.1180821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. M., & Martinez, L. (2013). An analysis of symbolic linguistic computing models in decision making. International Journal of General Systems, 42(1), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, R. M., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 1109–1119. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B. (1981). The optimisation problem formulation: Criticism and overstepping. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 32(6), 427–436. doi: 10.1057/jors.1981.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruspini, E. H. (1969). A new approach to clustering. Information and Control, 15(1), 22–32. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(69)90591-9
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary? European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85–91. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T., & Tran, L. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), 962–975. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1999). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sabokbar, H., Hosseini, A., Banaitis, A., & Banaitiene, N. (2016). A novel sorting method TOPSIS-SORT: An application for Tehran environmental quality evaluation. E + M Ekonomie a Management, 19(2), 87–104. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sant', A. P., Anna, N. A., Costa, H. G., & Pereira, V. (2015). CPP-TRI: A sorting method based on the probabilistic composition of preferences. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 7, 193–212. doi: 10.1504/IJIDS.2015.071372
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. J., & McGloin, J. M. (2014). Looking back to move forward: Some thoughts on measuring crime and delinquency over the past 50 years. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 445–466. doi: 10.1177/0022427813520446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervonen, T., Figueira, J., Lahdelma, R., Dias, A., & Salminen, P. (2009). A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, A. (2017). Crime rise is biggest in a decade, ONS figures show. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/20/official-figures-show-biggest-rise-crime-in-a-decade (accessed the 8th April 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Wallenius, J., Dyer, J., Fishburn, P., Steuer, R., Zionts, S., & Deb, K. (2008). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science, 54(7), 1336–1349. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-H., & Hao, J. (2006). A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(3), 435–445.[DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.876337 ]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 735–747. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. (1995). An approach to ordinal decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 12, 237–261. doi: 10.1016/0888-613X(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W. (1992). ELECTRE TRI: Aspects méthodologiques et manuel d'utilisation (Vol. 65, pp. 80). Paris: Université Paris-Dauphine.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning (I). Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar