202
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lexicographic hyperbolic DEA

&
Pages 979-990 | Received 05 Oct 2018, Accepted 15 Mar 2019, Published online: 23 Apr 2019

References

  • Aparicio, J. (2016). A survey on measuring efficiency through the determination of the least distance in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 9(2), 143–167. doi:10.1108/JCC-09-2016-0014
  • Aparicio, J., Ruíz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 209–218. doi:10.1007/s11123-007-0039-5
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  • Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and Distance Functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2), 407–419. doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.0096
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  • Coelli, T. (1998). A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models. Operations Research Letters, 23(3–5), 143–149.
  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Whittaker, G. (2013). Directional output distance functions: Endogenous constraints based on exogenous normalization constraints. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(3), 267–269. doi:10.1007/s11123-012-0333-8
  • Färe, R., Margaritis, D., Rouse, P., & Roshdi, I. (2016). Estimating the hyperbolic distance function: A directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(1), 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.045
  • Ghahraman, A., & Prior, D. (2016). A learning ladder toward efficiency: Proposing network-based stepwise benchmark selection. Omega, 63, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.004
  • Gutiérrez, E., Aguilera, E., Lozano, S., & Guzmán, G. I. (2017). A two-stage DEA approach for quantifying and analysing the inefficiency of conventional and organic rain-fed cereals in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 335–348. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.104
  • Hampf, B., & Krüger, J. J. (2015). Optimal directions for directional distance functions: An exploration of potential reductions of greenhouse gases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(3), 920–938. doi:10.1093/ajae/aau035
  • Hasannasab, M., Margaritis, D., Roshdi, I., & Rouse, P. (2018). Hyperbolic efficiency measurement: A conic programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.005
  • Korhonen, P. J., Dehnokhalaji, A., & Nasrabadi, N. (2018). A lexicographic radial projection onto the efficient frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(3), 1005–1012. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.050
  • Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00788.x
  • Lozano, S., & Calzada-Infante, L. (2018). Computing gradient-based stepwise benchmarking paths. Omega, 81, 195–207. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.11.002
  • Lozano, S., Hinojosa, M. A., & Mármol, A. M. (2019). Extending the bargaining approach to DEA target setting. Omega, 85, 94–102 doi:10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.015
  • Lozano, S., & Soltani, N. (2018a). DEA target setting using lexicographic and endogenous Directional Distance Function approaches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 50(1–2), 55–70. doi:10.1007/s11123-018-0534-x
  • Lozano, S., & Soltani, N. (2018b). Efficiency assessment using a multidirectional DDF approach. International Transactions in Operational Research. doi:10.1111/itor.12617
  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2005). Determining a sequence of targets in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(12), 1439–1447. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601964
  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2006). Data envelopment analysis of integer-valued inputs and outputs. Computers and Operations Research, 33(10), 3004–3014.
  • Pastor, J. T., Aparicio, J., Alcaraz, J., Vidal, F., Pastor, D. (2016). The reverse directional distance function. In J. Aparicio (Ed.) Advances in efficiency and productivity (vol. 249, pp. 15–55). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. New York: Springer.
  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 596–607. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00098-8
  • Portela, M. C. A. S., & Thanassoulis, E. (2007). Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(4), 481–490. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602166
  • Roshdi, I., Hasannasab, M., Margaritis, D., & Rouse, P. (2018). Generalised weak disposability and efficiency measurement in environmental technologies. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(3), 1000–1012. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.033
  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
  • Yu, M. M., & Lee, B. C. Y. (2009). Efficiency and effectiveness of service business: Evidence from international tourist hotels in Taiwan. Tourism Management, 30(4), 571–580. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.09.005
  • Zofio, J. L., Pastor, J. T., & Aparicio, J. (2013). The directional profit efficiency measure: On why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(3), 257–266. doi:10.1007/s11123-012-0292-0

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.