Data-driven satisficing measure and ranking

References

• Armbruster, B., & Delage, E. (2015). Decision making under uncertainty when preference information is incomplete. Management Science, 61, 111–128. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9, 203–228. doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardou, O., Frikha, N., & Pages, G. (2009). Computing var and cvar using stochastic approximation and adaptive unconstrained importance sampling. Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, 15, 173–210. doi:10.1515/MCMA.2009.011
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A., & Teboulle, M. (1986). Expected utility, penalty functions, and duality in stochastic nonlinear programming. Management Science, 32, 1445–1466. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A., & Teboulle, M. (2007). An old-new concept of convex risk measures: The optimized certainty equivalent. Mathematical Finance, 17, 449–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.2007.00311.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324–345. doi:10.1093/biomet/39.3-4.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. B. (2006). Risk and robust optimization (PhD thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. B., Giorgi, E. D., & Sim, M. (2012). Aspirational preferences and their representation by risk measures. Management Science, 58, 2095–2113. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. B., & Sim, M. (2009). Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Science, 55, 71–84. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubeck, S. (2011). Introduction to online optimization. Lecture Notes, 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonetto, P., Schmidt, M., & N. D, Freitas. (2009). An interior-point stochastic approximation method and an l1-regularized delta rule. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 233–240), Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. (2012). The convergence rate of a regularized ranking algorithm. Journal of Approximation Theory, 164, 1513–1519. doi:10.1016/j.jat.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Tang, Y., Li, L., Yuan, Y., Li, X., & Tang, Y. (2013). Error analysis of stochastic gradient descent ranking. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 43(3), 898–909. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2217957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. G., Long, D. Z., & Perakis, G. (2014). The impact of a target on newsvendor decisions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 17, 78–86. doi:10.1287/msom.2014.0500
   Google Scholar
• Dai, Z., Li, D., & Wen, F. (2016). Worse-case conditional value-at-risk for asymmetrically distributed asset scenarios returns. Journal of Computational Analysis & Applications, 20, 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Z., & Wen, F. (2018). Some improved sparse and stable portfolio optimization problems. Finance Research Letters, 27, 46–52. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2018.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, E. G., & Post, T. (2011). Loss aversion with a state-dependent reference point. Management Science, 57, 1094–1110. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delage, E., & Li, J. Y. M. (2017). Minimizing risk exposure when the choice of a risk measure is ambiguous. Management Science, 64(1), 327–344. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2593
   Google Scholar
• Delage, E., & Ye, Y. (2010). Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Operations Research, 58, 595–612. doi:10.1287/opre.1090.0741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchi, J., Hazan, E., & Singer, Y. (2011). Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2121–2159. doi:10.1109/TNN.2011.2146788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Föllmer, H., & Knispel, T. (2013). Convex risk measures: Basic facts, law-invariance and beyond, asymptotics for large portfolios. Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making, Part II, p. 507–554. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Föllmer, H., & Schied, A. (2011). Stochastic finance: An introduction in discrete time. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, J. C. (2007). New imperfect rankings models for ranked set sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137, 1433–1445. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2006.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahramani, Z. (2001). An introduction to hidden Markov models and Bayesian networks. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 15, 9–42. doi:10.1142/S0218001401000836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslum, K., & Årnes, A. (2006). Multisensor real-time risk assessment using continuous-time hidden Markov models. IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, Guangzhou, China, 2, 1536–1540.
   Google Scholar
• Homem-De-Mello, T. (2003). Variable-sample methods for stochastic optimization. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (Simulation), 13, 108–133. doi:10.1145/858481.858483
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., Homem-de Mello, T., & Mehrotra, S. (2012). Sample average approximation of stochastic dominance constrained programs. Mathematical Programming, 133, 171–201. doi:10.1007/s10107-010-0428-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, G., Fu, M. C., & Xu, C. (2015). Optimal importance sampling for simulation of Lévy processes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, p. 3813–3824. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1952). Stochastic estimation of the maximum of a regression function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 462–466. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729392
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Pasupathy, R., and Henderson, S. G. (2015). A guide to sample average approximation. Handbook of simulation optimization (p. 207–243). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1133–1165. doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriukova, G., Pereverzyev, S. V., & Tkachenko, P. (2016). On the convergence rate and some applications of regularized ranking algorithms. Journal of Complexity, 33, 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.jco.2015.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4, 43–68. doi:10.21314/JOR.2002.057
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, H., & G. G, Yin. (2003). Stochastic approximation and recursive algorithms and applications (Vol. 35). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Guo, Z. (2009). Hidden Markov model based real time network security quantification method. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing (NSWCTC 09), Wuhan, China. volume 2, p. 94–100.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Hu, L. (2017). Departure time and route choices in bottleneck equilibrium under risk and ambiguity. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 23, 571–590. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (2005). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, M., Yang, T., & Jin, R. (2012). Online stochastic optimization with multiple objectives. arXiv, 1211, 6013.
   Google Scholar
• Noyan, N., & Rudolf, G. (2013). Optimization with multivariate conditional value-at-risk constraints. Operations Research, 61, 990–1013. doi:10.1287/opre.2013.1186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, A., He, Y., Jekel, M., Reinhard, M., & Gin, K. Y.-H. (2014). Emerging contaminants of public health significance as water quality indicator compounds in the urban water cycle. Environment International, 71, 46–62. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltrinieri, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P., & Cozzani, V. (2014). Dynamic approach to risk management: Application to the hoeganaes metal dust accidents. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92, 669–679. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postek, K., den Hertog, D., & Melenberg, B. (2016). Computationally tractable counterparts of distributionally robust constraints on risk measures. SIAM Review, 58(4), 603–650. doi:10.1137/151005221
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951). A stochastic approximation method. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 400–407.doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586
   Google Scholar
• Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21–42. doi:10.21314/JOR.2000.038
   Google Scholar
• Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2013). The fundamental risk quadrangle in risk management, optimization and statistical estimation. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 18, 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.sorms.2013.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Ruszczynski, A., & Shapiro, A. (2006). Optimization of convex risk functions. Mathematics of Operations Research, 31, 433–452. doi:10.1287/moor.1050.0186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoy, M., & Aven, T. (2006). Real time updating of risk assessments during a drilling operation-alternative Bayesian approaches. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 13, 85–95. doi:10.1142/S0218539306002112
   Google Scholar
• Shalev, J. (2000). Loss aversion equilibrium. International Journal of Game Theory, 29, 269–287. doi:10.1007/s001820000038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev-Shwartz, S. (2011). Online learning and online convex optimization. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 4, 107–194. doi:10.1561/2200000018
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (2013). On kusuoka representation of law invariant risk measures. Mathematics of Operations Research, 38, 142–152. doi:10.1287/moor.1120.0563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118. doi:10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49, 253–283. doi:10.2307/1809901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2003). Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 111, 172–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00082-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., Zhang, Y., Cui, X., & Xi, H. (2008). Using hidden Markov models to evaluate the real-time risks of network. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling Workshop, Wuhan, China. p. 490–493.
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, E., van der Spiegel, M., Noordam, M., Pikkemaat, M., & van der Fels-Klerx, H. (2013). Risk ranking of chemical hazards in fooda case study on antibiotics in the Netherlands. Food Research International, 54, 1636–1642. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.08.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., & Ahmed, S. (2008). Sample average approximation of expected value constrained stochastic programs. Operations Research Letters, 36, 515–519. doi:10.1016/j.orl.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, R. C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). A bayesian approximation method for online ranking. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 267–300. doi:10.1080/00207179.2010.545079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & Yu, B. (2014). Cvar-constrained stochastic programming reformulation for stochastic nonlinear complementarity problems. Computational Optimization and Applications, 58, 483–501. doi:10.1007/s10589-013-9625-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Ting, D., Hai-Peng, Q., & Xi-Long, T. (2014). Real-time risk assessment based on hidden Markov model and security configuration. Paper presented at the 2014 International Conference on Information Science, Electronics and Electrical Engineering (ISEEE), Sapporo City, Hokkaido, Japan, vol. 3, p. 1600–1603.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., & Wang, X. (2012). Health risk assessment of urban surface waters based on real-time PCR detection of typical pathogens. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 18, 329–337. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.650585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Cao, F. (2012). Analysis of convergence performance of neural networks ranking algorithm. Neural Networks, 34, 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.20212.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar