The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR

References

• Adkins, L. (2005). Feminist social theory. In A. Harrington (Ed.), Modern social theory: An introduction (pp. 233–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (1982). Positivism, presuppositions, and current controversies (Vol. 1 of Theoretical logic in sociology). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashenden, S. (2005). Structuralism and post-structuralism. In A. Harrington (Ed.), Modern social theory: An introduction (pp. 196–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belsey, C. (2002). Poststructuralism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social science knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 8(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1978.tb00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brocklesby, J. (2016). The what, the why and the how of behavioural operational research: An invitation to potential sceptics. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 796–805. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Social paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network. In M Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1039–1087. doi: 10.1086/228386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, A. (1986). Rational choice Marxism. New Left Review, (160), 24–62.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s theory of history: A defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, F. C. (1990). Research methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. (2005). Modernity and postmodernity: Part II. In A. Harrington (Ed.), Modern social theory: An introduction (pp. 273–292). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1938). The rules of sociological methods. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive mapping: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(88)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (2001). The negotiation of purpose in multi-organizational collaborative groups. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 373–391. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. (2005). Psychoanalytic social theory. In A. Harrington (Ed.), Modern social theory: An introduction (pp. 175–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C. (1971). The theorem of the alternative in social choice theory. Operations Research, 19, 1323–1330. doi: 10.1287/opre.19.6.1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2018). Making OR practice visible: Using ethnomethodology to analyse facilitated modelling. European Journal of Operational Research, 265, 673–684. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2016). Behavioural operational research: Returning to the roots of the OR profession. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 791–795. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, J. K. (1997). Connective planning: From practice to theory and back. In E. L. Trist, F. Emery, & H. Murray (Eds.), The social engagement of social science (Vol. III: The socio-ecological perspective) (pp. 439–469). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, J., & Hickling, A. (2005). Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach. Oxford: Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, P. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action/structure and contradiction in social analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method (2nd ed). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology (5th ed). Polity: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981a). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Band I: Handlungsrational itat und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981b). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Band II: Zur Kritik der funktionalisischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981c). Talcott Parsons: Problems of theory and construction. Sociological Inquiry, 51, 173–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1981.tb00839.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R. P., Luoma, J., & Saarinen, E. (2013). On the importance of behavioural operational research. The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 623–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, E. B. (2001). Does constructivism subsume neo-functionalism? In T. Christiansen, K. E. Jørgensen, & A. Wiener (Eds.), Social construction of Europe (pp. 22–31). London: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. (2005). Functionalism and its critics. In A. Harrington (Ed.), Modern social theory: An introduction (pp. 87–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (1993). Social theory and operational research practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 563–577. doi: 10.2307/2584513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–483. doi: 10.2307/2581795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C., Keys, P. & Cropper, S. A. (1989). Operational research and the social sciences. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Konieczny, S., & Pérez, R. P. (2005). Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 160, 785–802. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C. (1999). Social theory and systems dynamics practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 113, 501–527. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00192-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C. (2000). Should systems dynamics be described as a ‘hard’ or ‘deterministic’ systems approach? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200001/02)17:1<3::AID-SRES344>3.3.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C. (2001a). Rerum cognoscere causas: Part I – How do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate?. System Dynamics Review, 17, 97–118. doi: 10.1002/sdr.209.abs
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C. (2001b). Rerum cognoscere causas: Part II – Opportunities generated by the agency/structure debate and suggestions for clarifying the social theoretic position of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 17, 293–309. doi: 10.1002/sdr.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C. (2004). Rational agents or accomplished social actors? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21, 433–438. doi: 10.1002/sres.650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor-network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. R. (1966). Operational research and the social sciences. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Loomba, A. (2005). Colonialism/postcolonialism: The new critical idiom (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, T. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, T. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action (Volume 2: Lifeworld and system; A critique of functionalist reason).Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Enl. Ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, G., Munlo, I., & Brown, M. (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 467–478. doi: 10.2307/3009885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1980). Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 7, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1984). Subjectivism and soft systems methodology – A critique. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 11, 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1992a). Technical, practical and critical OR – Past, present and future? In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1992b). Recent developments in critical management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(1), 1–10. doi: 10.2307/2583693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1995). Self-producing systems: Implications and applications of autopoiesis. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1997a). Multi-paradigm multimethodology. In J. Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 1–22). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1997b). Towards critical pluralism. In J. Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 407–440). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2000). The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for MS/OR and systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 1256–1270. doi: 10.2307/254211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25, 489–509. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Gill, A. (1997). Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (Ed.). (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, & organization. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi, H., Kacprzyk, J., & Fedrizzi, M. (1996). Probabilistic, fuzzy and rough concepts in social science. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 264–277. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00295-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2002). On the nature of OR: Taking stock. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 475–491. doi: 10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2010). Justifying the methods of OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1694–1708. doi: 10.1057/jors.2009.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2014). The mangle of OR practice: towards more informative case studies of ‘technical’ projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65, 1245–1260. doi: 10.1057/jors.2013.78
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2017). Writing practitioner case studies to help behavioural OR researchers ground their theories: Application of the mangle perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68, 507–520. doi: 10.1057/s41274-016-0011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2019). The fitness and survival of the OR profession in the age of artificial intelligence. https://www.academia.edu/s/827262285a/the-fitness-and-survival-of-the-or-profession-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence1?source=link (Accessed 16 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Outhwaite, W. (2005). Interpretivism and interactionism. In A. Harrington (Ed.), Modern social theory: An introduction (pp. 110–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw-Hill. See below for the two volume paperback version published in 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1968a). The structure of social action (Vol. I). New York: Free Press. doi: 10.1093/sw/23.5.429-e
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1968b). The structure of social action (Vol. II). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1977). Social systems and the evolution of action theory. New York: Free Press. doi: 10.1093/sw/23.5.429-e
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., Bales, R. F., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). (1953). Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. doi: 10.2307/2088179
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). (1951). Towards a general theory of action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and society. Glencoe IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J. (Ed.). (1989). Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction. In T. R. Schatzki, K. N. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2019). Exchange of emails with Richard Ormerod (Unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. N., & Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A., & Parsons, T. (1978). The theory of social action: The correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., & Marshall, G. (2009). Oxford dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taket, A. R., & White, L. (1993). After OR: An agenda for post modernism and poststructuralism in OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 867–881. doi: 10.2307/2584180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J., Ingram, N., Burke, C., & Abrahams, J. (2016). Bourdieu: The next generation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, P., White, L., & Yearworth, M. (2018). The value of problem structuring methods. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 36, 424–444. doi: 10.1002/sres.2557 (Accessed 17 December 2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern: Haupt. (The 1994 edition is published by Wiley, Chichester).
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. A., & Wolf, A. (2006). Contemporary sociological theory (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (2016). Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 827–841. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L., & Taket, A. (1997). Critiquing multimethodology as metamethodology: Working towards pragmatic pluralism. In J. Mingers, & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 379–406). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. C. (1959). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar