Valuation and investment strategies of carbon capture and storage technology under uncertainties in technology, policy and market

References

• Baker, E., & Solak, S. (2011). Climate change and optimal energy technology R&D policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(2), 442–454. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, M., Herzog, H., Parsons, J., & Sekar, R. (2007). Capture-ready coal plants-options, technologies and economics. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1(1), 113–120. doi:10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma, T. K., Meade, N., & Fleten, S.-E. (2012). Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1), 225–237. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, F. (2011). Carbon capture and storage as a corporate technology strategy challenge. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2256–2264. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristóbal, J., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Kraslawski, A., & Irabien, A. (2013). Stochastic MILP model for optimal timing of investments in CO2 capture technologies under uncertainty in prices. Energy, 54(1), 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.068
   Google Scholar
• Dahowski, R., Davidson, C., Li, X., & Wei, N. (2012). A $70/t CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation backstop for China’s industrial and electric power sectors: Insights from a comprehensive CCS cost curve. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 11(11), 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.024
   Google Scholar
• Dapeng, L., & Weiwei, W. (2009). Barriers and incentives of CCS deployment in China: Results from semi-structured interviews. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2421–2432. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhause, J., & Herold, J. (2014). Using real options to determine optimal funding strategies for CO2 capture, transport and storage projects in the European Union. Energy Policy, 66(3), 115–134. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.030
   Google Scholar
• Elias, R., Wahab, M., & Fang, L. (2018). Retrofitting carbon capture and storage to natural gas-fired power plants: A real-options approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 722–734. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouilloux, J., Moraux, F., & Viviani, J. (2015). Investing in finite-life carbon emissions reduction program under risk and idiosyncratic uncertainty. Energy Policy, 82(7), 310–320. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Szolgayova, J., Obersteiner, M., & Gusti, M. (2008). Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Applied Energy, 85(8), 708–721. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. (2011). Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons. Energy Economics, 33(4), 597–604. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Li, X. Q., & Chen, L. F. (2014). Analysis of policy incentives for selection of CCS technologies. Advanced Materials Research, 869, 967–970. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.869-870.967
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. IEA. (2017). World energy outlook 2017. Paris: EIA.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jingfu, Z. (2011). Analysis of cost and policy for CCS. Sino-Global Energy, 16(3), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kato, M., & Zhou, Y. (2011). A basic study of optimal investment of power sources considering environmental measures: economic evaluation of CCS through a real options approach. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 174(3), 9–17. doi:10.1002/eej.21065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingelhöfer, H. E. (2017). Unintended possible consequences of fuel input taxes for individual investments in greenhouse gas mitigation technologies and the resulting emissions. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 20(1), 1–11. doi:10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingelhöfer, H. E., & Kurz, P. (2011). Financial valuation of investments in future power generation technologies: Nuclear fusion and CCS in an emissions trading system. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 19(4), 415–438. doi:10.1007/s10100-011-0193-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnerud, K., Andersson, A. M., & Fleten, S.-E. (2014). Investment timing under uncertain renewable energy policy: An empirical study of small hydropower projects. Energy, 78(15), 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.081
   Google Scholar
• Mirzahosseini, A. H., & Taheri, T. (2012). Environmental, technical and financial feasibility study of solar power plants by RETScreen, according to the targeting of energy subsidies in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2806–2811. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priya, G. S. K., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Tan, R. (2014). Power system planning with emission constraints: Effects of CCS retrofitting. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(5), 447–455. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammerstorfer, M., & Eisl, R. (2011). Carbon capture and storage-investment strategies for the future? Energy Policy, 39(11), 7103–7111. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, K., Rubin, E., & Schrattenholzer, L. (2004). Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy, 29(9–10), 1309–1318. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlfs, W., & Madlener, R. (2013). Investment decisions under uncertainty: CCS competing with green energy technologies. Energy Procedia, 37, 7029–7038. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.638
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, D. P. (2009). Making carbon capture and storage work. Acting in time on energy policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shackley, S., & Verma, P. (2008). Tackling CO2 reduction in India through use of CO2 capture and storage (CCS): Prospects and challenges. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3554–3561. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solak, S., Clarke, J., Johnson, E., & Barnes, E. (2010). Optimization of R&D project portfolios under endogenous uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 420–433. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolgayova, J., Fuss, S., & Obersteiner, M. (2008). Assessing the effects of CO2 price caps on electricity investments–a real options analysis. Energy Policy, 36(10), 3974–3981. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2011). Compilation of economy-wide emission reduction targets to be implemented by parties included in Annex 1 to the convention. Retrieved October 26, 2015, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/sb/eng/inf01r01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E., Klass, A., & Bergan, S. (2009). Assessing a liability regime for carbon capture and storage. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 4575–4582. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.277
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Blyth, W., Bradley, R., Bunn, D., Clarke, C., & Wilson, T. (2008). Evaluating the power investment options with uncertainty in climate policy. Energy Economics, 30(4), 1933–1950. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Wang, X., Chen, J., Xie, X., Wang, K., & Wei, Y. (2014). A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties. Applied Energy, 113(1), 1059–1067. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.047
   Google Scholar
• Zhengze, Z. (2010). Research on investment decision of CCS for coal-fired power plant based on real options analysis. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., & Fan, Y. (2011). A real options–based CCS investment evaluation model: Case study of China’s power generation sector. Applied Energy, 88(12), 4320–4333. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar