272
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Resource flow network generation algorithm in robust project scheduling

, &
Pages 1294-1308 | Received 25 Feb 2019, Accepted 12 Jan 2020, Published online: 24 Feb 2020

References

  • Adida, E. 1. (2009). A robust optimisation approach to project scheduling and resource allocation. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 4(4), 169–193. doi:10.1504/IJSOI.2009.023421
  • Alcaraz, J., & Maroto, C. (2001). A robust genetic algorithm for resource allocation in project scheduling. Annals of Operations Research, 102(1/4), 83–109. doi:10.1023/A:1010949931021
  • Al-Fawzan, M. A., & Haouari, M. (2005). A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(2), 175–187. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.04.002
  • Almeida, B. F., Correia, I., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2016). Priority-based heuristics for the multi-skill resource constrained project scheduling problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 57, 91–103. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.017
  • Artigues, C., Leus, R., & Nobibon, F. T. (2013). Robust optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling with uncertain activity durations. Flexible Services & Manufacturing Journal, 25(1-2), 175–205. doi:10.1007/s10696-012-9147-2
  • Artigues, C., & Roubellat, F. (2000). A polynomial activity insertion algorithm in a multi-resource schedule with cumulative constraints and multiple modes. European Journal of Operational Research, 127(2), 297–316. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00496-8
  • Artigues, C., Michelon, P., & Reusser, S. (2003). Insertion techniques for static and dynamic resource-constrained project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 149(2), 249–267. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00758-0
  • Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Mazzuto, G., & Paciarotti, C. (2015). Robust multi-criteria project scheduling in plant engineering and construction. In C. Schwindt & J. Zimmermann (Eds.), Handbook on project management and scheduling. (Vol. 2, pp. 1291–1305). Cham: International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer.
  • Bowers, J. A. (1995). Criticality in resource constrained networks. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(1), 80–91. doi:10.1057/jors.1995.9
  • Bruni, M. E., Pugliese, L. D. P., Beraldi, P., & Guerriero, F. (2017). An adjustable robust optimization model for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations. Omega, 71, 66–84. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.009
  • Chand, S., Singh, H. K., & Ray, T. (2016). Finding robust solutions for resource constrained project scheduling problems involving uncertainties. Paper presented at 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) (pp. 225–232), IEEE, Vancouver, BC.
  • Cheng, M. Y., & Tran, D. H. (2016). An efficient hybrid differential evolution based serial method for multimode resource-constrained project scheduling. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(1), 90–100. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0414-0
  • Chtourou, H., & Haouari, M. (2008). A two-stage-priority-rule-based algorithm for robust resource-constrained project scheduling. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 183–194. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.11.017
  • Deblaere, F., Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W., & Vonder, S. V. D. (2007). Robust resource allocation decisions in resource-constrained projects. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 5–37. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00147.x
  • Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2011). Robust project scheduling. Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 3(3-4), 201–376. doi:10.1561/0200000021
  • Drwal, M. (2018). Robust scheduling to minimize the weighted number of late jobs with interval due-date uncertainty. Computers & Operations Research, 91, 13–20. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.010
  • Elshaer, R., & Yamamoto, H. (2011). New proactive time buffer heuristics for robust project scheduling. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 6(5), 559–571. doi:10.1299/jamdsm.6.559
  • Fu, Y., Tian, G., Li, Z., & Wang, Z. (2018). Parallel machine scheduling with dynamic resource allocation via a master–slave genetic algorithm. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 13(5), 748–756. doi:10.1002/tee.22625
  • Gülpınar, N., Çanakoğlu, E., & Branke, J. (2018). Heuristics for the stochastic dynamic task-resource allocation problem with retry opportunities. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(1), 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.006
  • Ke, H., Wang, L., & Huang, H. (2015). An uncertain model for RCPSP with solution robustness focusing on logistics project schedule. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 3(C), 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.enavi.2015.12.007
  • Khemakhem, M. A., & Chtourou, H. (2013). Efficient robustness measures for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 14(2), 245–267. doi:10.1504/IJISE.2013.053738
  • Klimek, M., & Łebkowski, P. (2011). Resource allocation for robust project scheduling. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 59(1), 51–55. doi:10.2478/v10175-011-0008-z
  • Klimek, M., & Łebkowski, P. (2013a). Robustness of schedules for project scheduling problem with cash flow optimisation. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 61(4), 1005–1015. doi:10.2478/bpasts-2013-0108
  • Klimek, M., & Łebkowski, P. (2013b). A two-phase algorithm for a resource constrained project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows. Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services, 7(1-2), 51–68. doi:10.7494/dmms.2013.7.1.51
  • Klimek, M., & Łebkowski, P. (2015). Heuristics for project scheduling with discounted cash flows optimisation. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, 63(3), 613–622. doi:10.1515/bpasts-2015-0072
  • Klimek, M., & Łebkowski, P. (2016). Proactive project scheduling with cash flow maximisation. Paper presented at the Manufacturing 2014 Contemporary Problems of Manufacturing and Production Management Selected Conference Proceedings, Poznań.
  • Krüger, D., & Scholl, A. (2010). Managing and modelling general resource transfers in (multi-) project scheduling. Operations Reasearch Spectrum, 32(2), 369–394. doi:10.1007/s00291-008-0144-5
  • Lamas, P., & Demeulemeester, E. (2016). A purely proactive scheduling procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with stochastic activity durations. Journal of Scheduling, 19(4), 409–428. doi:10.1007/s10951-015-0423-3
  • Lambrechts, O., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2006). A tabu search procedure for generating robust project baseline schedules under stochastic resource availabilities. Paper presented at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (pp. 1–26), Leuven, Belgium.
  • Lambrechts, O., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2011). Time slack-based techniques for robust project scheduling subject to resource uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 186(1), 443–464. doi:10.1007/s10479-010-0777-z
  • Leus, R., & Herroelen, W. (2004). Stability and resource allocation in project planning. IIE Transactions, 36(7), 667–682. doi:10.1080/07408170490447348
  • Ma, G., Gu, L., & Li, N. (2015). Scenario-based proactive robust optimization for critical-chain project scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(10), 04015030. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001003
  • Mahalleh, M. K. K., Ashjari, B., Yousefi, F., & Saberi, M. (2017). A robust solution to resource-constraint project scheduling problem. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, 17(3), 221–227. doi:10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.3.221
  • Policella, N. (2005). Scheduling with uncertainty: A proactive approach using partial order schedules. AI Communications, 18(2), 165–167.
  • Policella, N., Cesta, A., Oddi, A., & Smith, S. F. (2009). Solve-and-robustify. Journal of Scheduling, 12(3), 299–314. doi:10.1007/s10951-008-0091-7
  • Rohaninejad, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Nouri, B. V. (2015). Redundancy resource allocation for reliable project scheduling: A game-theoretical approach. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 265–273. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.489
  • Thiagarasu, V., & Devi, T. (2009). Multi-agent coordination in project scheduling: Priority rules based resource allocation. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 1(2), 42–46.
  • Tian, W., & Demeulemeester, E. (2010a). On the interaction between railway scheduling and resource flow networks. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1713081.
  • Tian, W., & Demeulemeester, E. (2010b). Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1551262.
  • Tian, W., & Demeulemeester, E. (2014). Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment. Annals of Operations Research, 213(1), 271–291. doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1277-0
  • Tian, J., & Murata, T. (2016). Robust scheduling for resource constraint scheduling problem by two-stage GA and MMEDA. Paper presented at the 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 1042–1047), IEEE, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Tritschler, M., Naber, A., & Kolisch, R. (2017). A hybrid metaheuristic for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(1), 262–273. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.006
  • Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2008). Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 723–733. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.061
  • Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2005). The use of buffers in project management: The trade-off between stability and makespan. International Journal of Production Economics, 97(2), 227–240. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.08.004
  • Wiesemann, W., Kuhn, D., & Rustem, B. (2012). Multi-resource allocation in stochastic project scheduling. Annals of Operations Research, 193(1), 193–220. doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0486-z
  • Yamashita, D. S., Armentano, V. A., & Laguna, M. (2007). Robust optimization models for project scheduling with resource availability cost. Journal of Scheduling, 10(1), 67–76. doi:10.1007/s10951-006-0326-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.