1,416
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Simulation on the effectiveness of carbon emission trading policy: A system dynamics approach

, , , , &
Pages 1447-1460 | Received 22 Mar 2019, Accepted 21 Feb 2020, Published online: 03 Apr 2020

References

  • Alves, M. R., Rodriguez, M., & Roseta-Palma, C. (2011). Sectoral and regional impacts of the European carbon market in Portugal. Energy Policy, 39 (5), 2528–2541. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.018
  • Azmi, M., & Tokai, A. (2016). System dynamic modeling of CO2 emissions and pollutants from passenger cars in Malaysia, 2040. Environment Systems and Decisions, 36(4), 335–350. doi:10.1007/s10669-016-9612-7
  • Boyce, J. K. (2018). Carbon pricing: Effectiveness and equity. Ecological Economics, 150, 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.030
  • Camila, B. B., Amalia, P. A., Maria, X., Sanna, S., & Semida, S. (2018). Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector. Energy Policy, 122, 287–299. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.010
  • Chappin, E. J. L., & Dijkema, G. P. J. (2009). On the impact of CO2 emission trading on power generation emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(3), 358–370. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.004
  • Charles, A., Darne, O., & Fouilloux, J. (2013). Market efficiency in the European carbon markets. Energy Policy, 60(5), 785–792. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.036
  • Chikan, A., & Kovacs, E. (2006). Inventory investment and GDP characteristics in OECD countries. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 2–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.004
  • Cynthia, J., & Pekins, J. D. (2015). The association between energy taxation, participation in an emissions trading system, and the intensity of carbon dioxide emissions in the European Union. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 397–417. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2015.10.004
  • Daneshzand, F., Amin-Naseri, M. R., Asali, M., Elkamel, A., & Fowler, M. (2019). A system dynamics model for optimal allocation of natural gas to various demand sectors. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 128, 88–105. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.05.040
  • Daskalakis, G. (2018). Temporal restrictions on emissions trading and the implications for the carbon futures market: Lessons from the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy, 115, 88–91. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.008
  • Ervine, K. (2018). How Low Can It Go? Analyzing the political economy of carbon market design and low carbon prices. New Political Economy, 23(6), 690–710. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1384454
  • Fan, X., Lv, X., Yin, J., & Liang, J. (2018). Quantifying market efficiency of China’s regional carbon market by multifractal detrended analysis. Energy Procedia., 152, 787–792. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.246
  • Ferreira, E. F., Hirama, K., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Applying system dynamics approach in software and information system projects: A mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 93, 58–73. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2017.08.013
  • Hidayatno, A., Destyanto, A. R., & Noor, S. T. (2019). Conceptualizing carbon emissions from energy utilization in Indonesia’s industrial sector. Energy Procedia., 156, 139–143. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.118
  • Hoad, K., & Kunc, M. (2018). Teaching system dynamics and discrete event simulation together: A case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(4), 517–527. doi:10.1057/s41274-017-0234-3
  • Ibikunle, G., Gregoriou, A., Hoepner, A. G. F., & Rhodes, M. (2016). Liquidity and market efficiency in the world’s largest carbon market. The British Accounting Review, 48(4), 431–447. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2015.11.001
  • Jiang, Y., Lei, Y. L., Yang, Y. Z., & Wang, F. (2018). Factors affecting the pilot trading market of carbon emissions in China. Petroleum Science, 15(2), 412–420. doi:10.1007/s12182-018-0224-3
  • Kang, H., Nembhard, H. B., Ghahramani, N., & Curry, W. (2018). A system dynamics approach to planning and evaluating interventions for chronic disease management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(7), 987–1005. doi:10.1057/s41274-017-0279-3
  • Khan, U., Nallareddy, S., & Rouen, E. (2019). The role of taxes in the disconnect between corporate performance and economic growth. Management Science. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3350
  • Kotir, J. H., Smith, C., Brown, G., Marshall, N., & Johnstone, R. (2016). A system dynamics simulation model for sustainable water resources management and agricultural development in the Volta River Basin, Ghana. Science of the Total Environment, 573, 444–457. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.081
  • Landolo, F., Barile, S., Armenia, S., & Carrubbo, L. (2018). A system dynamics perspective on a viable systems approach definition for sustainable value. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1245–1263. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0565-2
  • Li, F., Emrouznejad, A., Yang, G. L., & Li, Y. J. (2019). Carbon emission abatement quota allocation in Chinese manufacturing industries: An integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society. doi:10.1080/01605682.2019.1609892
  • Li, J., Wang, S. Y., Fan, J., & Liang, L. (2018). An equilibrium model of consumer energy choice using a personal carbon trading scheme based on allowance price. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1087–1096. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.040
  • Li, T. H., Yang, S. N., & Tian, M. X. (2019). Simulation and optimization of water supply and demand balance in Shenzhen: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 882–893. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.052
  • Liu, X. N., Wang, B., Du, M. Z., & Zhang, N. (2018). Potential economic gains and emissions reduction on carbon emissions trading for China’s large-scale thermal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 247–257. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.131
  • Liu, J. P., Zhang, X. B., & Song, X. H. (2018). Regional carbon emission evolution mechanism and its prediction approach driven by carbon trading-A case study of Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2793–2810. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.133
  • Lopez, N. S. A., Biona, J., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2018). Electricity trading and its effects on global carbon emissions: A decomposition analysis study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 532–539. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.231
  • Lvan, D. R., & Tulloch, D. J. (2018). Carbon pricing and system linking: Lessons from the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. Energy Economics, 73, 66–79. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.035
  • Machado, R. R., Conceição, S. V., Leite, H. G., Souza, A. L. d., & Wolff, E. (2015). Evaluation of forest growth and carbon stock in forestry projects by system dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 520–530. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.049
  • Mo, J. L., Zhu, L., & Fan, Y. (2012). The impact of the EU ETS on the corporate value of European electricity corporations. Energy, 45(1), 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.037
  • Montagnoli, A., & de Vries, F. P. (2010). Carbon trading thickness and market efficiency. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1331–1336. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.001
  • Munnings, C., Morgenstern, R. D., Wang, Z. M., & Liu, X. (2016). Assessing the design of three carbon trading pilot programs in China. Energy Policy, 96, 688–699. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.015
  • Pan, X. F., Ai, B. W., Li, C. Y., Pan, X. Y., & Yan, Y. B. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 428–435. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.012
  • Pan, X., Liu, Q., & Peng, X. (2015). Spatial club convergence of regional energy efficiency in China. Ecological Indicators, 51, 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.026
  • Pan, X., Pan, X., Ming, Y., & Zhang, J. (2018). The effect of regional mitigation of carbon dioxide emission on energy efficiency in China, based on a spatial econometrics approach. CARBON Management, 9(6), 665–676. doi:10.1080/17583004.2018.1537514
  • Pan, X. F., Uddin, M. K., Saima, U., Jiao, Z. M., & Han, C. C. (2019). How do industrialization and trade openness influence energy intensity? Evidence from a path model in case of Bangladesh. Energy Policy, 133. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110916
  • Pan, X. F., Zhang, J., Li, C. Y., Quan, R., & Li, B. (2018). Exploring dynamic impact of foreign direct investment on China’s CO2 emissions using Markov-Switching Vector Error Correction Model. Computational Economics, 52(4), 1139–1151. doi:10.1007/s10614-017-9745-x
  • Papachristos, G. (2019). System dynamics modelling and simulation for sociotechnical transitions research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 248–261. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.10.001
  • Park, G., & Park, H. (2018). Influence analysis of land use by population growth on urban flood risk using system dynamics. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 215, 195–205. doi:10.2495/EID180181
  • Pradhan, B. K., Ghosh, J., Yao, Y. F., & Liang, Q. M. (2017). Carbon pricing and terms of trade effects for China and India: A general equilibrium analysis. Economic Modelling, 63, 60–74. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.017
  • Rodriguez Lopez, J. M., Engels, A., & Knoll, L. (2017). Understanding carbon trading: Effects of delegating CO2 responsibility on organizations’ trading behavior. Climate Policy, 17(3), 346–360. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1119096
  • Shen, J. Y., Zhang, L. L., & Wang, Z. Z. (2016). Analysis of comprehensive utility of water utilization structure based on the integration methods of system dynamic and input-output analysis in Jiangsu province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 25(1), 16–24.
  • Sim, J. (2018). A carbon emission evaluation model for a container terminal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 526–533. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.170
  • Song, M. L., Cui, X., & Wang, S. H. (2018). Simulation of land green supply chain based on system dynamics and policy optimization. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 317–327. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.021
  • Suk, S. (2018). Determinants and characteristics of Korean companies’ carbon management under the carbon pricing scheme. Energies, 11(4), 966. doi:10.3390/en11040966
  • Susnik, J., Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S., Savic, D. A., & Kapelan, Z. (2012). Integrated system dynamics modelling for water scarcity assessment: Case study of the Kairouan region. Science of the Total Environment, 440, 290–306. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.085
  • Turner, B. L., Wuellner, M., Nichols, T., Gates, R., Tedeschi, L. O., & Dunn, B. H. (2017). A systems approach to forecast agricultural land transformation and soil environmental risk from economic, policy, and cultural scenarios in the north central United States (2012-2062). International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(2), 102–123. doi:10.1080/14735903.2017.1288029
  • Weng, Q. Q., & Xu, H. (2018). A review of China’s carbon trading market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 613–619. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.026
  • Winz, I., Brierley, G., & Trowsdale, S. (2009). The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water Resources Management, 23 (7), 1301–1323. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9328-7
  • Yang, Y., & Cheng, L. W. (2017). Operational efficiency evaluation and system design improvements for carbon emissions trading pilots in China. Carbon Management, 8(5-6), 399–415. doi:10.1080/17583004.2017.1387033
  • Yang, L., Li, F. Y., & Zhang, X. (2016). Chinese companies’ awareness and perceptions of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): Evidence from a national survey in China. Energy Policy, 98, 254–265. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.039
  • Zetterberg, L. (2014). Benchmarking in the European Union emissions trading system: Abatement incentives. Energy Economics, 43(2), 218–224. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.002
  • Zhang, D., Karplus, V. J., Cassisa, C., & Zhang, X. (2014). Emissions trading in China: Progress and prospects. Energy Policy, 75, 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.022
  • Zhang, L. R., Li, Y. K., & Jia, Z. J. (2018). Impact of carbon allowance allocation on power industry in China’s carbon trading market: Computable general equilibrium based analysis. Applied Energy, 229, 814–827. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.055
  • Zhang, M. S., Liu, Z. L., Jin, W., & Van Dijk, M. P. (2018). For CO2 emission trading in China, can the market become a national one, four years after creating seven local markets?. American Journal of Climate Change, 07 (02), 218–235. doi:10.4236/ajcc.2018.72015
  • Zhao, H. R., Zhao, H. R., Han, X. Y., He, Z. H., & Guo, S. (2016). Economic growth, electricity consumption, labor force and capital Input: A more comprehensive analysis on north China using panel data. Energy, 9(11), 1–21.
  • Ziemele, J., Cilinskis, E., Zogla, G., Gravelsins, A., Blumberga, A., & Blumberga, D. (2018). Impact of economical mechanisms on CO2 emissions from non-ETS district heating in Latvia using system dynamic approach. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 9(2), 111–121. doi:10.1007/s40095-017-0241-9
  • Ziemele, J., Gravelsins, A., Blumberga, A., & Blumberga, D. (2017). Combining energy efficiency at source and at consumer to reach 4th generation district heating: Economic and system dynamics analysis. Energy, 137, 595–606.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.