References
- Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1906814
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer-Nijhoff.
- Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 120(3), 253–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
- Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Activity Analysis of Production Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics Monograph (Vol.13). Wiley.
- Podinovski, V. V. (2004). Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: Selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601691
- Podinovski, V. V., Ismail, I., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., & Zhang, W. (2014). Combining the assumptions of variable and constant returns to scale in the efficiency evaluation of secondary schools. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 504–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.016