Medical device selection in private hospitals by integrated fuzzy MCGDM methods: a case study in choosing MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) system

References

• Akcan, S., & Güldeş, M. (2019). Integrated multicriteria decision-making methods to solve supplier selection problem: A case study in a hospital. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2019, 5614892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attri, R., & Grover, S. (2015). Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle. Journal of King Saud UniversityEngineering Sciences, 27(2), 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bahadori, M., Hosseini, S. M., Teymourzadeh, E., Ravangard, R., Raadabadi, M., & Alimohammadzadeh, K. (2017). A supplier selection model for hospitals using a combination of artificial neural network and fuzzy VIKOR. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(5), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., & Omid, M. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borujeni, M. P., & Gitinavard, H. (2017). Evaluating the sustainable mining contractor selection problems: An imprecise last aggregation preference selection index method. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 16(4), 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, A., & Singh, A. (2016). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1001–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. B. (2004). Group opinion aggregation based on a grading process: A method for constructing triangular fuzzy numbers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 48(10–11), 1619–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A., Opoku, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2017). Public healthcare practices and criteria for a sustainable procurement: A comparative study between UK and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 391–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems, theory and applications. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour, A., Nayeri, S., Sheikhalishahi, M., Wong, K. Y., Tian, G., & Fathollahi-Fard, A. M. (2021). A hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: A case study of Malaysian Palm oil industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12491-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z. P., Zhang, X., Chen, F. D., & Liu, Y. (2013). Extended TODIM method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 42, 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications, Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan, S., & Cheaitou, A. (2017). Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCGDM and multi-objective optimization approach. Computers & Operations Research, 81, 282–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancerliogullari, G., Calisir, C., Durucu, M., & Calisir, F. (2018). Radiologists’ perspective on the importance of factors for MRI system selection. In F. Calisir & H. Camgoz Akdag (Eds.), Industrial engineering in the industry 4.0 era. Lecture notes in management and industrial engineering (pp. 239–250). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Improta, G., Russo, M. A., Triassi, M., Converso, G., Murino, T., & Santillo, L. C. (2018). Use of the AHP methodology in system dynamics: Modelling and simulation for health technology assessments to determine the correct prosthesis choice for hernia diseases. Mathematical Biosciences, 299, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivlev, I., Vacek, J., & Kneppo, P. (2015). Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 247, 216–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, A. K., Larizgoitia, I., Audera-Lopez, C., Prasopa-Plaizier, N., Waters, H., & Bates, D. W. (2013). The global burden of unsafe medical care: Analytic modelling of observational studies. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(10), 809–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodadadzadeh, T., & Sadjadi, S. J. (2013). A state-of-art review on supplier selection problem, Decision Science Letters, 2(2), 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Koksalmis, G. H., Calisir, C., Durucu, M., & Calisir, F. (2018). Selecting an MRI System: A multi-criteria decision making model for MRI Technicians. International Journal of Business Analytics, 5(3), 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu. P., Kar, S., & Maiti, M. (2014). A fuzzy MCGDM method and an application to solid transportation problem with mode preference. Soft Computing, 18, 1853–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Kou, G., Li, Y., & Peng, Y. (2020). A group decision making approach for supplier selection with multi-period fuzzy information and opinion interaction among decision makers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madić, M., Antucheviciene, J., Radovanović, M., & Petković, D. (2017). Determination of laser cutting process conditions using the preference selection index method. Optics & Laser Technology, 89, 214–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, M. M., Abdallah, S., & Hussain, M. (2016). Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying analytical hierarchical process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1313–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manivel, P., & Ranganathan, R. (2019). An Efficient supplier selection model for hospital pharmacy through fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Services and Operations Management 33(4), 468–493.
   Google Scholar
• Maniya, K., & Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method, Materials & Design, 31(4), 1785–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS England. (2020). Diagnostic Imaging Dataset Annual Statistical Release 2019/20. Department of Health. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Annual-Statistical-Release-2019-20-PDF-1.4MB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Cirovic, G., & Arlasheedi, M. A. (2020). Application of improved best worst method (BWM) in real-world problems. Mathematics, 8(8), 1342 https://doi.org/10.3390/math8081342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puška, A., Kozarević, S., Stević, Ž., & Stovrag, J. (2018). A new way of applying interval fuzzy logic in group decision making for supplier selection. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 52(2), 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2017). An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 626–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosina, J., Rogalewicz, V., Ivlev, I., Juřičková, I., Donin, G., Vacek, J., Otawová, R., & Kneppo, P. (2015, June 7–12). HTA for medical devices: Multiple-criteria decision making as an outcome evaluation tool. In D. Jaffray (Eds.), World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering (Vol. 51). Toronto, Canada. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang, X., & Liu, X. (2016). An interval type-2 fuzzy sets-based TODIM method and its application to green supplier selection.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(5), 722–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovic, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D., Subotić, M., & Pamucar, D. (2020). A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis, Mathematics 8(3), 457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCGDM Method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering 140, 106231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the process of supplier selection criteria and methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024–1034.
   Google Scholar
• TuşIşık, A., & Aytaç Adalı, E. (2018). CODAS ve PSI yöntemleri ile personel değerlendirmesi. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(2), 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ugalmugle, S. (2019). Magnetic resonance imaging systems market size & forecast, 2019 - 2025. Report ID: GMI2140. Global Market Insights Inc.,
   Google Scholar
• Ulutaş, A., Topal, A., & Bakhat, R. (2019). An application of fuzzy integrated model in green supplier selection. Mathematıcal Problems in Engıneerıng, 2019, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4256359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., Zandieh, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2011). Two novel FMCGDM methods for alternative-fuel buses selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(3), 1396–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. G., Dubey, R., Joy, P., Thomas, M., Vijeesh, V., & Moosa, A. (2015). Supplier selection in blood bags manufacturing industry using TOPSIS model. International Journal of Operational Research, 24(4), 461.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2010). More health for the money. In World Health Report 2010: Health systems financing, the path to universal coverage (pp. 60–84). WHO. Chapter 4. http://www.who.int/whr/2010/en/index.html and https://www.who.int/whr/2010/10_summary_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2016). Diagnostic errors: Technical series on safer primary care. World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2019, September 13). WHO calls for urgent action to reduce patient harm in healthcare. https://www.who.int/news/item/13-09-2019-who-calls-for-urgent-action-to-reduce-patient-harm-in-healthcare.
   Google Scholar