1,458
Views
73
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2518-2535 | Received 13 Jul 2021, Accepted 19 Oct 2021, Published online: 12 Nov 2021

References

  • Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alcalá-Fdez, J., & Porcel, C. (2008). A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20262
  • Cabrerizo, F. J., Morente-Molinera, J. A., Pedrycz, W., Taghavi, A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency. Expert Systems with Applications, 99, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.030
  • Chao, X., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2021a). An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement. Information Sciences, 575, 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.047
  • Chao, X., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Viedma, E. H. (2021b). Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: An application in financial inclusion. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.047
  • Cheng, D., Cheng, F., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Y. (2020). Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making. Information Fusion, 59, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.004
  • Dong, Y., Li, C.-C., & Herrera, F. (2016). Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information. Information Sciences, 367–368, 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.003
  • Dong, Q., Sheng, Q., Martínez, L., & Zhang, Z. (2022). An adaptive group decision making framework: Individual and local world opinion based opinion dynamics. Information Fusion, 78, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.09.013
  • Dong, Y., Xu, Y., & Yu, S. (2009). Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(6), 1366–1378.
  • Dong, Y., Zha, Q., Zhang, H., Kou, G., Fujita, H., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018a). Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036
  • Dong, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, H., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018b). A self-management mechanism for noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3276–3288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2818078
  • Gao, H., Ju, Y., Zeng, X.-J., & Zhang, W. (2021). Satisfaction-driven consensus model for social network MCGDM with incomplete information under probabilistic linguistic trust. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, 107099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107099
  • Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 746–752.
  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F. J., Kacprzyk, J., & Pedrycz, W. (2014). A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Information Fusion, 17, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.002
  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Palomares, I., Li, C.-C., Cabrerizo, F. J., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2021). Revisiting fuzzy and linguistic decision making: Scenarios and challenges for making wiser decisions in a better way. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3043016
  • Liang, Q., Liao, X., & Shang, J. (2020). A multiple criteria approach integrating social ties to support purchase decision. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 147, 106655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106655
  • Liao, H., Kuang, L., Liu, Y., & Tang, M. (2021). Non-cooperative behavior management in group decision making by a conflict resolution process and its implementation for pharmaceutical supplier selection. Information Sciences, 567, 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.010
  • Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). Consistency-driven methodology to manage incomplete linguistic preference relation: A perspective based on personalized individual semantics. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3072147
  • Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., & Herrera, F. (2019). A consensus model for large-scale linguistic group decision making with a feedback recommendation based on clustered personalized individual semantics and opposing consensus groups. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2857720
  • Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martínez, L. (2017). Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching. Information Fusion, 33, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.04.005
  • Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., Pedrycz, W., & Herrera, F. (2020). Integrating continual personalized individual semantics learning in consensus reaching in linguistic group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3031086
  • Li, G., Kou, G., Li, Y., & Peng, Y. (2021a). A group decision making approach for supplier selection with multi-period fuzzy information and opinion interaction among decision makers. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1869917
  • Li, G., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2021b). Heterogeneous large-scale group decision making using fuzzy cluster analysis and its application to emergency response plan selection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3068759
  • Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G., & Wang, H. (2021). Multi-attribute group decision making with opinion dynamics based on social trust network. Information Fusion, 75, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.010
  • Lin, C., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2020). Aggregation of the nearest consistency matrices with the acceptable consensus in AHP-GDM. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03572-1
  • Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Dong, Y. (2019). Ranking range based approach to MADM under incomplete context and its application in venture investment evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(5), 877–899. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.10296
  • Lu, Y., Xu, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Han, Y. (2021). Consensus of large-scale group decision making in social network: The minimum cost model based on robust optimization. Information Sciences, 547, 910–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.022
  • Mendel, J., Zadeh, L., Trillas, E., Yager, R., Lawry, J., Hagras, H., & Guadarrama, S. (2010). What computing with words means to me [Discussion Forum]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 5(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2009.934561
  • Palomares, I., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2014). A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2262769
  • Song, Y., & Li, G. (2019). A large-scale group decision-making with incomplete multi-granular probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in sustainable supplier selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 827–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1458017
  • Song, Y., Li, G., Ergu, D., & Liu, N. (2021). An optimisation-based method to conduct consistency and consensus in group decision making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1873079
  • Tian, Z-p., Nie, R-x., & Wang, J-q. (2019). Social network analysis-based consensus-supporting framework for large-scale group decision-making with incomplete interval type-2 fuzzy information. Information Sciences, 502, 446–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.053
  • Tian, Z-p., Nie, R-x., Wang, J-q., & Long, R-y. (2021). Adaptive consensus-based model for heterogeneous large-scale group decision making: Detecting and managing non-cooperative behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(8), 2209–2223. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2995229
  • Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2011). Practical aggregation operators for gradual trust and distrust. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 184(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2010.10.015
  • Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Sun, Q., & Fujita, H. (2021). A maximum self-esteem degree based feedback mechanism for group consensus reaching with the distributed linguistic trust propagation in social network. Information Fusion, 67, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.010
  • Wu, Z., Yang, X., Tu, J., & Chen, X. (2020). Optimal consistency and consensus models for interval additive preference relations: A discrete distribution perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(9), 1479–1497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1621219
  • Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Kou, G., Zhang, H., Chao, X., Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., & Herrera, F. (2021). Distributed linguistic representations in decision making: Taxonomy, key elements and applications, and challenges in data science and explainable artificial intelligence. Information Fusion, 65, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.018
  • Xiao, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2020). Managing classification-based consensus in social network group decision making: An optimization-based approach with minimum information loss. Information Fusion, 63, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.05.008
  • Xiao, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2021). Exploring the ordinal classifications of failure modes in the reliability management: An optimization-based consensus model with bounded confidences. Group Decision and Negotiation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09756-9
  • Xu, X-h., Du, Z-j., & Chen, X-h. (2015). Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decision Support Systems, 79, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.009
  • Xu, X., Zhang, Q., & Chen, X. (2020). Consensus-based non-cooperative behaviors management in large-group emergency decision-making considering experts trust relations and preference risks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 190, 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105108
  • Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
  • Yager, R. R. (1996). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<49::AID-INT3>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Yu, S.-m., Du, Z.-j., Zhang, X.-y., Luo, H.-y., & Lin, X.-d. (2021). Punishment-driven consensus reaching model in social network large-scale decision-making with application to social capital selection. Applied Soft Computing, 113, 107912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107912
  • Yu, D., Kou, G., Xu, Z., & Shi, S. (2021). Analysis of collaboration evolution in AHP research: 1982–2018. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20(01), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500406
  • Yu, W., Zhang, Z., & Zhong, Q. (2021). Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: A minimum adjustment-based approach. Annals of Operations Research, 300(2), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03432-7
  • Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Xiao, J., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Personalized individual semantics-based approach for linguistic failure modes and effects analysis with incomplete preference information. IISE Transactions, 52(11), 1275–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2020.1731774
  • Zhang, H., Li, C.-C., Liu, Y., & Dong, Y. (2021). Modeling personalized individual semantics and consensus in comparative linguistic expression preference relations with self-confidence: An optimization-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(3), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2957259
  • Zhang, H., Palomares, I., Dong, Y., & Wang, W. (2018). Managing non-cooperative behaviors in consensus-based multiple attribute group decision making: An approach based on social network analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.008
  • Zhang, Z., Gao, Y., & Li, Z. (2020a). Consensus reaching for social network group decision making by considering leadership and bounded confidence. Knowledge-Based Systems, 204, 106240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106240
  • Zhang, Z., Li, Z., & Gao, Y. (2021). Consensus reaching for group decision making with multi-granular unbalanced linguistic information: A bounded confidence and minimum adjustment-based approach. Information Fusion, 74, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.006
  • Zhang, Z., Yu, W., Martínez, L., & Gao, Y. (2020b). managing multigranular unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic information in multiattribute large-scale group decision making: A linguistic distribution-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 28(11), 2875–2889. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2949758

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.