Adjustable variables multiple-dependent-state sampling plans based on a process capability index

References

• Aldosari, M. S., Aslam, M., Jun, C. H., & Khan, K. (2018). A new control chart for monitoring the process mean using successive sampling and multiple dependent state repetitive sampling. Technologies, 6(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6030070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldosari, M. S., Aslam, M., Khan, N., & Jun, C. H. (2018). Design of a new variable shewhart control chart using multiple dependent state repetitive sampling. Symmetry, 10(11), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110641
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Azam, M., & Jun, C. H. (2013). Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41(2), 20120012. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20120012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Balamurali, S., & Jun, C. H. (2021a). A new multiple dependent state sampling plan based on the process capability index. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 50(6), 1711–1727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1588307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Jeyadurga, P., Balamurali, S., Azam, M., & Al-Marshadi, A. (2021b). Economic determination of modified multiple dependent state sampling plan under some lifetime distributions. Journal of Mathematics, 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7470196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wang, F. K., Khan, N., & Jun, C. H. (2018). A multiple dependent state repetitive sampling plan for linear profiles. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(3), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0227-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., & Jun, C. H. (2007). Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., & Usha, M. (2019). Determination of an efficient variables sampling system based on the Taguchi process capability index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1441637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capper, P., & Mauk, M. (2007). Liquid phase epitaxy of electronic, optical and optoelectronic materials. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F. (1955). Chain sampling inspection plan. Industrial Quality Control, 11(4), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gharaibeh, N. G., Liu, L., & Wani, S. S. (2012). Skip-lot acceptance sampling plans for highway construction and materials. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(7), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K. (1990). Conditional zero acceptance number (COZAN) plan. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 7(4), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719010138885
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., & Subramani, K. (1990). Selection of multiple deferred state MDS-1 sample plans for given acceptable quality level and limiting quality level involving minimum risks. Journal of Applied Statistics, 17(3), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769000000015
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., & Subramani, K. (1993). Selection of multiple deferred (dependent) state sampling plans for given acceptable quality level and limiting quality level. Journal of Applied Statistics, 20(3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769300000041
   Google Scholar
• Karimi-Mamaghan, M., Mohammadi, M., Jula, P., Pirayesh, A., & Ahmadi, H. (2020). A learning-based metaheuristic for a multi-objective agile inspection planning model under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(2), 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuralmani, V., & Govlndaraju, K. (1992). Selection of multiple deferred (dependent) state sampling plans. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 21(5), 1339–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929208830851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepore, A., Palumbo, B., & Castagliola, P. (2018). A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. R., Chen, X. L., Sarker, B. R., & Yi, H. Z. (2015). Determining the optimal procurement policy and maximum allowable lifespan for machining tools with stochastically distributed toollife. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(12), 2050–2060. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, W. Q., & Escoba, L. A. (2004). Reliability: The other dimension of quality. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2004.11673062
   Google Scholar
• Mogg, J. M., & Wortham, A. W. (1970). Dependent stage sampling inspection. International Journal of Production Research, 8(4), 385–395.
   Google Scholar
• Paci, A., Borget, I., Mercier, L., Azar, Y., Desmaris, R., & Bourget, P. (2012). Safety and quality assurance of chemotherapeutic preparations in a hospital production unit: Acceptance sampling plan and economic impact. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 18(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155211402865
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., & Lin, P. C. (2004). Testing process performance based on capability index Cpk with critical value. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2003.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., & Wu, C. W. (2007). An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega, 35(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. J. D. (1998). Direct search algorithms for optimization calculations. Acta Numerica, 7, 287–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900002841
   Google Scholar
• Qian, C., & Anderson, E. (2020). Buyer’s optimal information revelation strategy in procurement auctions. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(3), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakovics, V., Tóth, A. L., Podör, B., Frigeri, C., Balázs, J., & Horváth, Z. E. (2002). Liquid phase epitaxy growth and characterization of Ga1 − xInxAsySb1 − y quaternary alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 91–92, 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Inc. (2020). shiny: Easy web applications in R. http://shiny.rstudio.com.
   Google Scholar
• Santos-Fernández, E., Govindaraju, K., & Jones, G. (2014). A new variables acceptance sampling plan for food safety. Food Control, 44, 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, M. H., Wu, C. W., Hsu, B. M., & Wang, T. C. (2021a). Lifetime performance-qualified sampling system under a Weibull distribution with failure-censoring. Quality Engineering, 33(3), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2021.1874014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, M. H., Wang, T. C., & Hsu, B. M. (2021b). An integrated supplier-buyer lots sampling plan with quality traceability based on process loss restricted consideration. IEEE Access, 9, 102687–102699. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3095932.
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V., & Vijayaraghavan, R. (1990). Construction and selection of multiple dependent (deferred) state sampling plan. Journal of Applied Statistics, 17(3), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769000000012
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasa Rao, G., Raza, M. A., Aslam, M., Al-Marshadi, A. H., & Jun, C. H. (2019). A variable control chart based on process capability index under generalized multiple dependent state sampling. IEEE Access, 7, 34031–34044. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamirat, Y., & Wang, F. K. (2019). Acceptance sampling plans based on EWMA yield index for the first order autoregressive process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(7), 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1487819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. R., Lio, Y., Jiang, N., Lin, Y. J., & Fan, Y. Y. (2015). Economical sampling plans with warranty based on truncated data from Burr type XII distribution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(9), 1511–1518. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vännman, K. (1997). Distribution & moments in simplified form for a general class of capability indices. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 26(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929708831908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. C., Wu, C. W., & Shu, M. H. (2020). A variables-type multiple-dependent-state sampling plan based on the lifetime performance index under a Weibull distribution. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03655-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham, A. W., & Baker, R. C. (1976). Multiple deferred state sampling inspection. International Journal of Production Research, 14(6), 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207547608956391
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., & Chen, J. T. (2021). A modified sampling plan by variables with an adjustable mechanism for lot sentencing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(3), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1657366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., Lee, A. H. I., & Chen, Y. W. (2015). A novel lot sentencing method by variables inspection considering multiple dependent state. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), 985–994. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., & Wang, Z. H. (2017). Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss. International Journal of Production Research, 55(8), 2351–2364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1244360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., Wang, Z. H., & Shu, M. H. (2015). A lots-dependent variables sampling plan considering supplier’s process loss and buyer’s stipulated specifications requirement. International Journal of Production Research, 53(20), 6308–6319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1053580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar