Simulation optimization using stochastic kriging with robust statistics

References

• Angün, E. (2011). A risk-averse approach to simulation optimization with multiple responses. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(3), 911–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankenman, B., Nelson, B. L., & Staum, J. (2010). Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Operations Research, 58(2), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, A., Shioya, H., & Park, C. (2011). Statistical inference: The minimum distance approach. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Gal, I. (2005). Outlier detection[M]//Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Zhou, Q. (2017). Sequential design strategies for mean response surface metamodeling via stochastic kriging with adaptive exploration and exploitation. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, G. F., & Pinto, L. R. (2018). Kriging-based simulation optimization: An emergency medical system application. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(12), 2006–2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1418149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressie, N., & Hawkins, D. M. (1980). Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 12(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035243
   Google Scholar
• Dellino, G., Kleijnen, J. P. C., & Meloni, C. (2012). Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Krige combined. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 24(3), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1110.0465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellino, G., Jack, P. C, K., & Meloni, C. (2015). Metamodel-Based Robust Simulation-Optimization: An Overview. In Uncertainty management in simulation-optimization of complex systems (pp. 27–54). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., Wang, J., Ma, Y., & Tu, Y. (2021). Robust parameter design based on Gaussian process with model uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 59(9), 2772–2788. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1740344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, M. C., & Healy, K. J. (1997). Techniques for optimization via simulation: An experimental study on an (s, S) inventory system. IIE Transactions, 29(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179708966326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genton, M. G. (1998). Highly robust variogram estimation. Mathematical Geology, 30(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021728614555
   Google Scholar
• Han, M., & Tan, M. H. Y. (2016). Integrated parameter and tolerance design with computer experiments. IIE Transactions, 48(11), 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2016.1167289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., Zhu, P. F., & Park, S. H. (2012). A robust desirability function method for multi-response surface optimization considering model uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(1), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettmansperger, T. P., & McKean, J. W. (2010). Robust nonparametric statistical methods (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, R. V., McKean, J. W., & Craig, A. T. (2013). Introduction to mathematical statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D., Allen, T. T., Notz, W. I., & Zeng, N. (2006). Global optimization of stochastic black-box systems via sequential kriging meta-models. Journal of Global Optimization, 34(3), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-005-2454-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009). Robust statistics. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Karlin, S. (1958). Steady state solution. In K. J. Arrow, S. Kalin, and H. Scarf (Eds.), Studies in the mathematical theory of inventory and production. Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2017a). Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2017b). Comment on Park.’s “Robust Kriging in computer experiments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(6), 739–740. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0101-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C., & Mehdad, E. (2016). Estimating the variance of the predictor in stochastic Kriging. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 66, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C., Van Beers, W., & Van Nieuwenhuyse, I. (2012). Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped kriging. Journal of Global Optimization, 54(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-011-9741-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konietschke, F., & Pauly, M. (2014). Bootstrapping and permuting paired t-test type statistics. Statistics and Computing, 24(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-012-9370-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B. G. (1994). Efficiency versus robustness: The case for minimum Hellinger distance and related methods. Annals of Statistics, 22, 1081–1114. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176325512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopiano, K. K., Young, L. J., & Gotway, C. A. (2014). A pseudo-penalized quasi-likelihood approach to the spatial misalignment problem with non-normal data. Biometrics, 70(3), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, T. W., Kelton, W. D., Sánchez, P. J., Sanchez, S. M., & Anderson, B. M. (2015). Changing the paradigm: Simulation, now a method of first resort. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 62(4), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdad, E., & Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2015). Classic Kriging versus Kriging with bootstrapping or conditional simulation: Classic Kriging’s robust confidence intervals and optimization. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(11), 1804–1814. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, L. H., Ma, Y. Z., Wang, J. J., & Tu, Y. L. (2017). A new loss function for mutli-response optimization with model parameter uncertainty and implementation errors. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, L. H., Park, C., Byun, J. H., & Leeds, M. (2019). Robust design in the case of data contamination and model departure. In Statistical quality technologies (pp. 347–373). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, L. H., Zhu, S. C., Ye, K. Y., Park, C., & Wang, M. (2021). Robust Bayesian hierarchical modeling and inference using scale mixtures of normal distributions. IISE Transactions, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2021.1912440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., Kim, H., & Wang, M. (2020). Investigation of finite-sample properties of robust location and scale estimators. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1699114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., & Leeds, M. (2016). A highly efficient robust design under data contamination. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 93, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, T., Yum, B., Hung, Y., Jeong, Y. S., & Jeong, M. K. (2016). Robust Kriging models in computer experiments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(4), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnianifard, A., Azfanizam, A. S., Ariffin, M. K. A., & Ismail, M. I. S. (2020). Crossing weighted uncertainty scenarios assisted distribution-free metamodel-based robust simulation optimization. Engineering with Computers, 36(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-00690-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumlee, M., & Tuo, R. (2014). Building accurate emulators for stochastic simulations via quantile Kriging. Technometrics, 56(4), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2013.860919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, B. J., Fuentes, M., & Dunson, D. B. (2011). Bayesian spatial quantile regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. J., & Croux, C. (1993). Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(424), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., & Notz, W. I. (2003). The design and analysis of computer experiments. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffe, H. (1964). The analysis of variance. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shamos, M. I. (1976). Geometry and statistics: Problems at the interface. In New directions and recent results in algorithms and complexity (pp. 251–280). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M. H. Y. (2016). Monotonic quantile regression with Bernstein polynomials for stochastic simulation. Technometrics, 58(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2015.1027066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beers, W. C., & Kleijnen, J. P. (2003). Kriging for interpolation in random simulation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. J., & Chen, X. (2018). An adaptive two-stage dual metamodeling approach for stochastic simulation experiments. IISE Transactions, 50(9), 820–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1452082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. (2015). Comparing the variances of two dependent variables. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40488-015-0030-z
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Cai, J., Mizutani, S., & Nakagawa, T. (2021). Preventive replacement policies with time of operations, mission durations, minimal repairs and maintenance triggering approaches. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Chen, M., & Nakagawa, T. (2020). Periodic replacement policies with shortage and excess costs. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03566-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Lin, D., Hu, X., & Jiang, T. (2019). Robust parameter design based on Kullback-Leibler divergence. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar