Goal programming duality revisited: Formulation of a set of variant duals

References

• Arik, O. A., Kose, E., & Canbulut, G. (2020). Goal programming approach for carrying people with physical disabilities. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 32(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v32i4.3461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T. (2007a). Revised multi-choice goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32(12), 2587–2595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T., 35. (2007). Multi-choice goal programming. Omega, 35(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, X., Dong, Y., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: A method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight. Annals of Operations Research, 316(1), 143–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03927-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Ferguson, R. (1955). Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science, 1(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1.2.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despotis, D., & Derpanis, D. (2008). A minmax goal programming approach to priority derivation in AHP with interval judgements. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 07(01), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622008002867
   Google Scholar
• Dillenburger, S., Jordan, J., & Cochran, J. (2019). Pareto-optimality for lethality and collateral risk in the airstrike multi-objective problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society. (October), 70(7), 1051–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1487818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, R. (1976). A new goal programming formulation. Omega, 4(6), 731–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(76)90099-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., Guo, W., Herrera-Viedma, E., Gong, Z., & Wei, G. (2020). Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(1), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guijarro, F., Visbal-Cadavid, D., & Martínez-Gómez, M. (2018, January 1). Ranking universities through an extended goal programming model. In Modeling social behavior and its applications (pp. 57–68). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, H.-P. (2019). The supplier selection problem of a manufacturing company using the weighted multi-choice goal programming and MINMAX multi-choice goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 75, 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignizio, J. (1976). Goal progamming and extensions. Lexington Books, Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Ignizio, J. (1985). Duality and sensitivity analysis in introduction to linear goal programming. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984669.n6
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., Florentino, H., Cantane, D., & Oliveira, R. (2016). An extended goal programming methodology for analysis of a network encompassing multiple objectives and stakeholders. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., & Oliveira, R. (2022). Multi-objective optimisation: Methods and applications, forthcoming. In S. Salhi & J. Boylan (Eds.), Handbook of operational research. Palgrove.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., & Romero, C. (2019). Advances and new orientations in goal programming. In M. Doumpos, J. Rui Figueira, S. Greco, & C. Zopounidis (Eds.), New perspectives in multiple criteria decision making: Innovative applications and case studies (pp. 231–246). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., & Tamiz, M. (2010). Practical goal programming. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, C., & Ignizio, J. (1983). Duality and transformations in multiphase and sequential Linear Goal Programming. Computers & Operations Research, 10(4), 321–333. 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(83)90007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogryczak, W. (1988). Symmetric duality theory for linear goal programming. Optimization, 19(3), 373–396.
   Google Scholar
• Omrani, H., Valipour, M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2019). Using weighted goal programming model for planning regional sustainable development to optimal workforce allocation: An application for provinces of Iran. Social Indicators Research, 141(3), 1007–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1868-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paksoy, T., & Chang, C.-T. (2010). Revised multi-choice goal programming for multi-period, multi-stage inventory controlled supply chain model with popup stores in Guerrilla marketing. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3586–3598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, B. B., Kumar, M. (2014). Extended goal programming approach with interval data uncertainty for resource allocation in farm planning: A case study. In ICT & Critical Infrastructure: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Convention of Computer Society of India, I (pp. 639–651).
   Google Scholar
• Pourkarimi, L., & Zarepisheh, M. (2007). A dual-based algorithm for solving lexicographic multiple objective programs. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(3), 1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, N., Gholizadeh, H., Nayeri, S., & Ashrafi, T. A. (2021, October). A robust optimization model of the field hospitals in the sustainable blood supply chain in crisis logistics. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(12), 2804–2828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1821586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C. (2001). Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Omega, 29(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00026-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C. (2004). A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(3), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00793-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruben, C., Dhulipala, S., Bretas, A., Guan, Y., & Bretas, N. (2020). Multi-objective MILP model for PMU allocation considering enhanced gross error detection: A weighted goal programming framework. Electric Power Systems Research, 182, 106235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urı́a, M. V. R., Caballero, R., Ruiz, F., & Romero, C. (2002). Meta-goal progamming. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(2), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00332-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2019). Health service design with conjoint optimization. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(7), 1091–1101. (https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.-J., & Wu, Y.-K. (2021). Minimum adjustment cost-based multi-stage goal programming models for consistency improving and consensus building with multiplicative reciprocal paired comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1935336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Dong, Y., Zhang, H., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: A perspective of game theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar