618
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stochastic data envelopment analysis in the presence of undesirable outputs

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2619-2632 | Received 27 Jun 2022, Accepted 10 Dec 2022, Published online: 09 Feb 2023

References

  • Amirteimoori, A., Mehdizadeh, S., & Kordrostami, S. (2022a). Stochastic performance measurement in two-stage network processes: A data envelopment analysis approach. Kybernetica, 58(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.14736/kyb-2022-2-0200
  • Amirteimoori, A., Sahoo, B. K., Charles, V., & Mehdizadeh, S. (2022b). Stochastic benchmarking: Theory and applications. In International series in operations research & management science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89869-4
  • Amirteimoori, A., Zadmirzaei, M., & Hassanzadeh, F. (2021). Developing a new integrated artificial immune system and fuzzy non-discretionary DEA approach. Soft Computing, 25(13), 8109–8127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05725-1
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  • Banker, R. D., & Morey, R. C. (1986). Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research, 34(4), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.34.4.513
  • Charles, V., Gherman, T., & Zhu, J. (2021). Data envelopment analysis and big data: A systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis. In J. Zhu & V. Charles (Eds.), Data-enabled analytics: DEA for big data (pp. 1–30). Springer.
  • Charles, V., & Kumar, V. (2014). Satisficing data envelopment analysis: An application to SERVQUAL efficiency. Measurement, 51, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.023
  • Charles, V., Kumar, S., & Charles, I. K. (2014). The performance of printed circuit boards in the presence of production errors: A comparative analysis using various DEA models. In I. H. Osman, A. L. Anouze, & A. Emrouznejad (Eds.), Strategic performance management using data envelopment analysis (pp. 487–509). IGI Global.
  • Charles, V., Kumar, M., & Irene Kavitha, S. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of assembled printed circuit boards with undesirable outputs using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.11.010
  • Charles, V., Tsolas, I. E., & Gherman, T. (2018). Satisficing data envelopment analysis: A Bayesian approach for peer mining in the banking sector. Annals of Operations Research, 269(1-2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2552-x
  • Charles, V., & Zavala, J. J. (2017). A satisficing DEA model to measure the customer-based brand equity. RAIRO - Operations Research, 51(3), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2016041
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  • Chen, C. M., Du, J., Huo, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Undesirable factors in integer-valued DEA: Evaluating the operational efficiencies of city bus systems considering safety records. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.040
  • Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
  • Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z., Lelas, V., Li, S. X., & Olesen, O. B. (1998). Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018320430249
  • Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z., & Li, S. X. (1996). Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 66(4), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187302
  • Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z., & Li, S. X. (2004). Chance-constrained DEA. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 211–240). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 71. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_9
  • Ebrahimnejad, A., Tavana, M., & Charles, V. (2022). Analytics under uncertainty: A novel method for solving linear programming problems with trapezoidal fuzzy variables. Soft Computing, 26(1), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06389-7
  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2003). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs, comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 1070–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00510
  • Grosskopf, S. (1996). Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(2-3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157039
  • Hailu, A., & Veeman, T. S. (2001). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00181
  • Hu, X., & Liu, C. (2015). Managing undesirable outputs in the Australian construction industry using Data Envelopment Analysis models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.077
  • Jin, J., Zhou, D., & Zhou, P. (2014). Measuring environmental performance with stochastic environmental DEA: The case of APEC economies. Economic Modelling, 38, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.12.017
  • Jung, E. J., Kim, J. S., & Rhee, S. K. (2001). The measurement of corporate environmental performance and its application to the analysis of efficiency in oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00011-7
  • Kahane, Y. (1977). Determination of the product mix and the business policy of an insurance company—A portfolio approach. Management Science, 23(10), 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.23.10.1060
  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2021). Measuring the effects of undesirable outputs on the efficiency of production units. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(3), 996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.026
  • Kumar-Mandal, S., & Madheswaran, S. (2010). Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: An interstate analysis. Energy Policy, 38(2), 1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.063
  • Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00788.x
  • Li, F., Wang, Y., Emrouznejad, A., Zhu, Q., & Kou, G. (2022). Allocating a fixed cost across decision-making units with undesirable outputs: A bargaining game approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(10), 2309–2325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1981781
  • Lu, C. C., Chiu, Y. H., Shyu, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2013). Measuring CO2 emission efficiency in OECD countries: Application of the hybrid efficiency model. Economic Modelling, 32, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.047
  • Mahdiloo, M., Jafarzadeh, A. H., Farzipoor Saen, R., Wu, Y., & Rice, J. (2018). Modelling undesirable outputs in multiple objective data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(12), 1903–1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1415647
  • Mehdizadeh, S., Amirteimoori, A., Charles, V., Behzadi, M. H., & Kordrostami, S. (2021). Measuring the efficiency of two-stage network processes: A satisficing DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(2), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1671151
  • Nasseri, S. H., Ebrahimnejad, A., & Gholami, O. (2018). Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs and its application to banking industry. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(2), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0367-1
  • Olesen, O. B. (2006). Comparing and combining two approaches for chance constrained DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-0008-4
  • Olesen, O. B., & Petersen, N. C. (1995). Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41(3), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.3.442
  • Olesen, O. B., & Petersen, N. C. (2000). Foundation of chance constrained data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmann efficient production possibility sets. In Proceedings fra International DEA Symposium 2000, Measurement and Improvement in the 21st Century, 2-4 July (pp. 313–349). The University of Queensland.
  • Podinovski, V. V., & Kuosmanen, T. (2011). Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.12.003
  • Rashidi, K., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2015). Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Economics, 50, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.018
  • Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0
  • Seiford, L., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 42, 16–20.
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1963). A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Management Science, 9(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.2.277
  • Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press.
  • Shiraz, R. K., Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Fukuyama, H. (2020). Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs. Operational Research, 20(3), 1863–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0378-1
  • Tsolas, I. E., & Charles, V. (2015). Incorporating risk into bank efficiency: A satisficing DEA approach to assess the Greek banking crisis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(7), 3491–3500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.033
  • Wang, Z., Feng, C., & Zhang, B. (2014). An empirical analysis of China’s energy efficiency from both static and dynamic perspectives. Energy, 74, 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.082
  • Wu, C., Li, Y., Liu, Q., & Wang, K. (2013). A stochastic DEA model considering undesirable outputs with weak disposability. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5-6), 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.09.022
  • Wu, J., An, Q., Ali, S., & Liang, L. (2013). DEA based resource allocation considering environmental factors. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5-6), 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.11.030
  • Zanella, A., Camanho, A., & Dias, T. G. (2015). Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(2), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.036
  • Zhu, J. (2022). DEA under big data: Data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 309, 761–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03668-8
  • Zhu, J., & Charles, V. (Eds.). (2021). Data-enabled analytics: DEA for big data. Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.