Playing the new devil’s advocate role in facilitated modelling processes to address group homogeneity

References

• Ackermann, F. (1996). Participants’ perceptions on the role of facilitators using group decision support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackermann, F., Andersen, D. F., Eden, C., & Richardson, G. P. (2011). ScriptsMap: A tool for designing multi-method policy-making workshops. Omega, 39(4), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. F., Richardson, G. (2010). Improvised Facilitation: A Third Leg on the Group Model Building Stool. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. F., & Richardson, G. P. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. F., Vennix, J. A. M., Richardson, G. P., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2007). Group model building: Problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(5), 691–694. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 12(3), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO;2-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreteau, O., Bots, P., Daniell, K., Etienne, M., Perez, P., Barnaud, C., Bazile, D., Becu, N., Castella, J.-C., Daré, W., & Trebuil, G. (2017). Participatory Approaches. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity (Issue Understanding Complex Systems, pp. 253–292) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66948-9_12
   Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2006). Common ground, complex problems and decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(6), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9030-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). Groups and facilitators within problem structuring processes. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(7), 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bots, P. W. G., & van Daalen, C. E. (2008). Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: A framework for reflection. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9108-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocklesby, J. (2016). The what, the why and the how of behavioural operational research - An invitation to potential sceptics. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 796–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when Stakeholders matter - Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C., & Adamowski, J. (2015). Empowering marginalized communities in water resources management: Addressing inequitable practices in Participatory Model Building. Journal of Environmental Management, 153, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappuccio, V., Cunico, G., & Zimmermann, N. (2017). Shaping policy development in a UK Government department. HopefullNESS the 13th Nordic Environmental Social Science Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Colin, E., & Radford, J. (1990). Tackling strategic problems: The role of group decision support. SAGE Publications. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/43598/
   Google Scholar
• Cunico, G. (2017). Playing the Devil’s Advocate in Facilitated System Dynamics Modelling Processes: the case of the UK retrofit system. Master Thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• de Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E., van Kranenburg, H., & Freeman, E. (2017). Reviewing the role of stakeholders in Operational Research: A stakeholder theory perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E., van Kranenburg, H., Freeman, E., & van Breen, H. (2016). Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rivera, J. (1968). The psychological dimension of foreign policy. CE Merrill Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637100700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.5.589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, C. (1992). A framework for thinking about Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS). Group Decision and Negotiation, 1(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126263
   Google Scholar
• Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2006). Where next for problem structuring methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 766–768. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, C., & Sims, D. (1979). On the nature of problems in consulting practice. Omega, 7(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(79)90099-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah, S., Bakhanova, E., Hämäläinen, R. P., & Voinov, A. (2023). A competency framework for participatory modeling. Group Decision and Negotiation, 32(3), 569–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09818-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Strobel, J., Cheng, X., Chen, X., Kim, H., Olesova, L., Sadaf, A., & Tomory, A. (2010). Expressions of critical thinking in role-playing simulations: Comparisons across roles. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(2), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, J. K., & Lindoerfer, J. S. (1989). Groupthink and the space shuttle challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020304
   Google Scholar
• Faure, G. O. (1999). The cultural dimension of negotiation: The Chinese case. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(3), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008682612803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flippen, A. R. (1999). Understanding groupthink from a self-regulatory perspective. Small Group Research, 30(2), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W., & Senge, P. M. (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 14(1), 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2018). Making OR practice visible: Using ethnomethodology to analyse facilitated modelling workshops. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(2), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., Hämäläinen, R. P., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., & Leppänen, I. (2021). Taking stock of behavioural OR : A review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Montibeller, G. (2010). Facilitated modelling in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Nielsen, M. F. (2018). Examining group facilitation in situ: The use of formulations in facilitation practice. Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(5), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9577-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2011). Decision development in facilitated modelling workshops. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, J. (2006). Labels, methodologies and strategic decision support. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., & Vaandrager, D. (2018). Group model building in a pressure cooker: A field experiment with public policy. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, R., Brugnach, M., & Pluchinotta, I. (2017). Ambiguity in problem framing as a barrier to collective actions: Some hints from groundwater protection policy in the Apulia Region. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(5), 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9519-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, P. D. (2017). Integrated environmental modelling: Human decisions, human challenges. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 408(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP408.9
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2004). Decision analysis for management judgment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/3010535TQ11]
   Google Scholar
• Gooyert, V., De Rouwette, E., Kranenburg, H., Van Freeman, E., & H. Van, Breen. (2022). Cognitive change and consensus forming in facilitated modelling : A comparison of experienced and observed outcomes. European Journal of Operational Research, 299(2), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of United Kingdom (2017). House building; new build dwellings.   December Quarter 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Guertler, P., Robson, D., Royston, S. (2013). Somewhere between a ‘Comedy of errors’ and ‘As you like it’? A brief history of Britain’s ‘Green Deal’ so far. ECEEE Summer Study Proceedings, 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, A., Mustafee, N., & Yearworth, M. (2021). Facets of trust in simulation studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 289(1), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.06.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, T. T., & Estes, R. W. (1977). Improving executive decisions by formalizing dissent: The corporate devil’s advocate. The Academy of Management Review, 2(4), 662–667. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4406749
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, H. J., McCardle-Keurentjes, M. H. F., & Videira, N. (2016). Evaluating facilitated modelling processes and outcomes: An experiment comparing a single and a multimethod approach in group model building. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(6), 1277–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9480-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houzz & Home (2016). HOUZZ & HOME – UK August 2016 (Issue August). http://st.hzcdn.com/static/econ/en-GB/U.KHouzzHome2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hovmand, P., Rouwette, E., Andersen, D. F., Richardson, G. P., Calhoun, A., Rux, K., Hower, T. (2011). Scriptapedia: A handbook of scripts for developing structured group model building sessions. Proceedings of the 2011 International System Dynamics Conference, 1–16. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2011/proceed/papers/P1404.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Cropper, S. (1994). From many to one-and back. An exploration of some components of facilitation. Omega, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2006). Beyond problem structuring methods: Reinventing the future of OR/MS. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 868–878. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1968). Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics, 20(3), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. (2012). Why we are poles apart on climate change. Nature, 488(7411), 255–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/488255a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Andersen, D. F. (2012). Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data: Mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve. System Dynamics Review, 28(4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-Y. (2017). Intercoder Reliability Techniques: Cohen’s Kappa. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 736–738) SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n256
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams : The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/256728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotiadis, K., & Tako, A. A. (2018). Facilitated post-model coding in discrete event simulation (DES): A case study in healthcare. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(3), 1120–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunc, M., Malpass, J., & White, L. (2016). Behavioral operational research: Theory, methodology and practice. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53551-1
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C. (1992). Modelling as learning: A consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90007-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. C., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2023). Towards a behavioural system dynamics : Exploring its scope and delineating its promise. European Journal of Operational Research, 306(2), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. O. (1969). A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning. Management Science, 15(8), B-403–B-414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.8.B403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, M., Kakarika, M., Mainemelis, C., & Deuschel, N. T. (2017). A metatheoretical framework of diversity in teams. Human Relations, 70(8), 911–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716679246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCardle-Keurentjes, M., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2018). Asking questions: A Sine qua non of facilitation in decision support? Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(5), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9573-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00056-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, S. M. (1994). Avoidance of Groupthink. Small Group Research, 25(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494251007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroff, I. I., & Emshoff, J. R. (1979). On strategic assumption-making: A dialectical approach to policy and planning. The Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4289165
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, A., Allbeck, J. M., Sood, A., & Janssen, T. L. (2012). Exploring game design for cybersecurity training [Paper presentation]. IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems, CYBER 2012, Proceedings 2012, 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBER.2012.6392562
   Google Scholar
• Namin, S. A., Aguirre-Munoz, Z., Jones, K. (2016). Teaching Cyber Security through Competition. Annual International Conference on Computer Science Education: Innovation & Technology, 98–104. http://www.myweb.ttu.edu/asiamina/research_files/CyberCorpsData/Namin-etal-CSEIT2016-V6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The Content Analysis Guidebook. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J. D. (1997). From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00027-4
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Osita, I., Onyebuchi, I., & Nzekwe, J. (2014). Organization’s stability and productivity: The role of SWOT analysis an acronym for strength, weakness, opportunities and threat. International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research, 2(9), 23–32. http://www.journalijiar.com
   Google Scholar
• Papamichail, K. N., Alves, G., French, S., Yang, J. B., & Snowdon, R. (2007). Facilitation practices in decision workshops. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(5), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, S., & Vannix, J. A. M. (1998). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(7), 766–767. https://doi.org/10.2307/3010247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. D., & Phillips, M. C. (1993). Faciliated work groups: Theory and practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(6), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1993.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Reed, M., Quinn, C., Jin, N., Holden, J., Burt, T., Kirby, M., & Sendzimir, J. (2007). If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: Traditional versus participatory model building. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(3), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801807X211720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrko, I., Eden, C., & Howick, S. (2019). Knowledge acquisition using group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 28(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-019-09614-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., & Andersen, D. (1995). Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review, 11(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260110203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Worthington, C., Burgess, N., & Radnor, Z. J. (2014). Facilitated modelling with discrete-event simulation: Reality or myth? European Journal of Operational Research, 234(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenow, J., & Eyre, N. (2016). A post mortem of the Green Deal: Austerity, energy efficiency, and failure in British energy policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 21, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2011). Facilitated modelling in strategy development: Measuring the impact on communication, consensus and commitment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(5), 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Korzilius, H., Vennix, J. A. M., & Jacobs, E. (2011). Modeling as persuasion: The impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadia, R. (2014). The impact of culture on group model-building process. 2014 Proceedings of PICMET: Infrastructure and Service Integration, 1585–1590. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmw012.3
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1990). A General Philosophy of Helping: Process Consultation. Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, S. (2005). The IAF Handbook of Group Facilitation: Best practices from the leading organization in facilitation. Josse-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, S. P. (1996). The role of facilitator in collaborative groups. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating Collaborative Advantage (pp. 126–140). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221600
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. (1984). Devil’s advocacy in managerial decision-making. Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. R. (1982). Effects of inquiry methods and ambiguity tolerance on prediction performance. Decision Sciences, 13(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1982.tb00143.x
   Google Scholar
• Scott Poole, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. J., Cavana, R. Y., & Cameron, D. (2016a). Client perceptions of reported outcomes of group model building in the New Zealand public sector. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9433-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. J., Cavana, R. Y., & Cameron, D. (2016b). Recent evidence on the effectiveness of group model building. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlacko, M., Martinuzzi, A., Røpke, I., Videira, N., & Antunes, P. (2014). Participatory systems mapping for sustainable consumption: Discussion of a method promoting systemic insights. Ecological Economics, 106, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubsole, C., Macmillan, a., Davies, M., & May, N. (2014). 100 Unintended consequences of policies to improve the energy efficiency of the UK housing stock. Indoor and Built Environment, 23(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X14524586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D., Eden, C., & Jones, S. (1981). Facilitating problem definition in teams. European Journal of Operational Research, 6(4), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(81)90302-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. G., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, L(2), 90–99. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9d73/986223dbfd7c799516bc0cc8f48e1869fbc5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stave, K. (2010). Participatory system dynamics modeling for sustainable environmental management: Observations from four cases. Sustainability, 2(9), 2762–2784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2092762
   Google Scholar
• Tako, A. A., & Kotiadis, K. (2015). PartiSim: A multi-methodology framework to support facilitated simulation modelling in healthcare. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(2), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavella, E., & Franco, L. A. (2015). Dynamics of group knowledge production in facilitated modelling workshops: An exploratory study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9398-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavella, E., & Papadopoulos, T. (2015a). Expert and novice facilitated modelling: A case of a Viable System Model workshop in a local food network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavella, E., & Papadopoulos, T. (2015b). Novice facilitators and the use of scripts for managing facilitated modelling workshops. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(12), 1967–1988. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavella, E., Papadopoulos, T., & Paroutis, S. (2021). Artefact appropriation in facilitated modelling: An adaptive structuration theory approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(11), 2381–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1790308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D., & Hardy, C. (2011). Managing organizational change: Negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organization Science, 22(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. P., Howick, S., & Belton, V. (2016). Critical Learning Incidents in system dynamics modelling engagements. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group model building. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vennix, J. A. M., Gubbels, J. W., Post, D., & Poppen, H. J. (1990). A structured approach to knowledge elicitation in conceptual model building. System Dynamics Review, 6(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260060205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videira, N., Antunes, P., & Santos, R. (2009). Scoping river basin management issues with participatory modelling: The Baixo Guadiana experience. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 965–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videira, N., Lopes, R., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Casanova, J. L. (2012). Mapping Maritime Sustainability Issues with Stakeholder Groups. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(6), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinov, A., Kolagani, N., McCall, M. K., Glynn, P. D., Kragt, M. E., Ostermann, F. O., Pierce, S. A., & Ramu, P. (2016). Modelling with stakeholders - Next generation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. A. (2004). Socratic strategies and devil’s advocacy in synchronous CMC debate. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00082.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, A. M., & Garcia, J. E. (1996). The facilitator and the chauffeur in GSS: Explorations in the forging of a relationship. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, B., Aguiar, A., Gkini, C., Czermainski de Oliveira, I., Lunde Trellevik, L. K., & Kopainsky, B. (2020). Reflections on adapting group model building scripts into online workshops. System Dynamics Review, 36(3), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeijlemaker, S., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Cunico, G., Armenia, S., & von Kutzschenbach, M. (2022). Decision-Makers’ Understanding of Cyber-Security’s Systemic and Dynamic Complexity: Insights from a Board Game for Bank Managers. Systems, 10(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10020049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, N., Pluchinotta, I., Salvia, G., Touchie, M., Stopps, H., Hamilton, I., Kesik, T., Dianati, K., & Chen, T. (2021). Moving online: Reflections from conducting system dynamics workshops in virtual settings. System Dynamics Review, 37(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar