Exploring the Utility of Preference Assessments in Organizational Behavior Management

REFERENCES

• Branch , S. 1999 . The 100 best companies to work for in America . Fortune , 139 : 118 – 131 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr , J. E. , Nicolson , A. C. and Higbee , T. S. 2000 . Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 33 : 353 – 357 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon , I. G. and Iwata , B. A. 1996 . Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 29 : 519 – 533 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon , M. R. 2001 . “ Making sense of employee compensation strategies ” . In Organizational change , Edited by: Hayes , L. J. , Austin , J. , Houmanfar , R. and Clayton , M. 273 – 275 . Reno, NV : Context Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fisher , W. , Piazza , C. C. , Bowman , L. G. , Hagopian , L. P. , Owens , J. C. and Slevin , I. 1992 . A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 25 : 491 – 498 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levering , R. , Moskowitz , M. and Adams , S. 2004 . The 100 best companies to work for . Fortune , 149 : 56 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Levering , R. , Moskowitz , M. , Garcia , F. and Vella-Zarb , K. 2000 . The 100 best companies to work for . Fortune , 141 : 82 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Northup , J. , George , T. , Jones , K. , Broussard , C. and Vollmer , T. R. 1996 . A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. , 29 : 201 – 212 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northup , J. , Jones , K. , Broussard , C. and George , T. 1995 . A preliminary comparison of reinforcer assessment methods for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 28 : 99 – 100 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pace , G. M. , Ivancic , M. T. , Edwards , G. L. , Iwata , B. A. and Page , T. J. 1985 . Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 18 : 249 – 255 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder , D. A. , Rost , K. and McMahon , M. 2007 . The accuracy of managerial prediction of employee preference: A brief report . Journal of Organizational Behavior Management , 27 : 1 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder , D. A. , Therrien , K. and Wine , B. 2005 . A comparison between survey and verbal choice methods of identifying potential reinforcers among employees . Journal of Organizational Behavior Management , 24 : 1 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Windsor , J. , Picke , L. M. and Locke , P. A. 1994 . Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods . Research in Developmental Disabilities , 15 : 439 – 455 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar