Managing Performance to Change Behavior

REFERENCES

• Aguinis , H. 2009 . Performance management , 2nd , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Berkshire , H. and Highland , R. 1953 . Forced-choice performance rating: A methodological stud . Personnel Psychology , 6 : 355 – 378 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardin , H. J. and Buckley , M. R. 1981 . A consideration of strategies in rater training . Academy of Management , 6 : 205 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Bernardin , H. J. and Pence , E. C. 1980 . Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy . Journal of Applied Psychology , 65 : 60 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino , M. C. , Varela , J. A. , Bande , B. and Turnely , W. H. 2006 . The impact of impression management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behaviors . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 27 : 281 – 297 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman , W. C. 1977 . Consistency of rating accuracy and rater errors in the judgment of human performance . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 20 : 238 – 252 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman , W. C. 1987 . Personal constructs, performance schemata, and “folk theories” of subordinate effectiveness: Exploration in an army officer sample . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 40 : 307 – 322 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman , W. C. 2004 . The concept of organizational citizenship . Current Directions in Psychological Science , 13 : 238 – 241 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman , W. C. , Penner , L. A. , Allen , T. D. and Motowidlo , S. J. 2001 . Personality predictors of citizenship performance . International Journal of Selection and Assessment , 9 : 52 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman , W. C. and Motowidlo , S. J. 1993 . “ Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance ” . In Personnel selection in organizations , Edited by: Schmitt , N. and Borman , W. 71 – 98 . San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Boswell , W. R. and Boudreau , J. W. 2001 . How leading companies create, measure, and achieve results through “line of sight” . Management Decisions , 39 : 851 – 859 .
   Google Scholar
• Brannick , M. T. , Salas , E. and Prince , C. , eds. 1997 . Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications , Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Brief , A. P. and Motowidlo , S. J. 1986 . Prosocial organizational behavior . Academy of Management Review , 11 : 710 – 725 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardy , R. L. and Dobbins , G. H. 1994 . Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives , Cincinnati, OH : South-Western Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland , J. N. , Murphy , K. R. and Williams , R. E. 1989 . Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates . Journal of Applied Psychology , 74 : 130 – 135 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coens , T. and Jenkins , M. 2000 . Abolishing performance appraisals: Why they backfire and what to do instead , San Francisco, CA : Berrett-Keohler .
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. 1996 . Cognitive processes in performance appraisal: A research agenda with implications for practice , London, , England : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. 2000 . “ Performance appraisal and control systems: A Multilevel approach ” . In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations , Edited by: Klein , K. and Kozlowski , S. 121 – 156 . San Francisco, CA : SIOP Frontiers Series, Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. , Cafferty , T. P. and Meglino , B. M. 1984 . A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 33 : 360 – 396 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. and Gonzalez , J. A. 2004 . “ Design performance appraisal to improve performance ” . In The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior , Edited by: Locke , E. A. 60 – 72 . London, , England : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. and Peters , L. H. 1996 . The organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field . Journal of Applied Psychology , 81 : 717 – 737 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. and Pritchard , R. D. 2006 . Improving individual performance: A motivational framework . Management and Organization Review , 2 : 253 – 277 .
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi , A. S. and Sonesh , S. 2011 . “ Appraising and managing performance at work ” . In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology , Edited by: Zedeck , S. , Aquinis , H. and Zhou , J. 255 – 280 . Washington, DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• Dunnette , M. D. 1963 . A note on the criterion . Journal of Applied Psychology , 47 : 351 – 354 .
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , J. M. 1981 . Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal . Journal of Applied Psychology , 66 : 127 – 148 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan , J. C. 1954 . The critical incident technique . Psychological Bulletin , 51 : 327 – 358 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman , P. S. 1986 . “ Impact of task and technology on group performance ” . In Designing effective work groups , Edited by: Goodman , P. S. 120 – 167 . San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg , J. 1986 . Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations . Journal of Applied Psychology , 71 : 340 – 342 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold , D. M. , Liden , R. C. and Leatherwood , M. L. 1987 . Using multiple attributes to assess sources of performance feedback . Academy of Management Journal , 30 : 826 – 835 .
   Google Scholar
• Huselid , M. A. 1996 . The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial reporting . Academy of Management Journal , 39 : 779 – 801 .
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen , D. R. 1993 . “ Performance appraisal accuracy: An illusive and sometimes misguided goal ” . In Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives , Edited by: Schuler , H. , Farr , J. L. and Smith , M. 235 – 252 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen , D. R. and Feldman , J. M. 1983 . “ Performance appraisal: A process focus ” . In Research in organizational behavior , Edited by: Cummings , L. and Staw , B. Vol. 5 , 349 – 380 . Greenwich, CT : JAI .
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen , D. R. , Fisher , C. D. and Taylor , M. S. 1979 . Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations . Journal of Applied Psychology , 64 : 347 – 371 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , J. 2005 . Employees’ justice perceptions of performance appraisals systems: Attitudinal, behavioral, and performance consequences . Journal of Applied Psychology , 79 : 937 – 939 .
   Google Scholar
• Kluger , A. N. and DeNisi , A. S. 1996 . The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, meta-analysis, a preliminary feedback intervention theory . Psychological Bulletin , 119 : 254 – 284 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger , A. N. and DeNisi , A. S. 1998 . Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edge sword . Current Directions in Psychological Science , 7 : 67 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki , J. L. 1998 . When performance improvement is the goal: A new set of criteria for criteria . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 31 : 263 – 280 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki , J. L. and Minnich , M. R. 2001 . “ Developing performance appraisals: Criteria for what and how performance is measured ” . In Handbook of organizational performance: Behavior analysis and management , Edited by: Johnson , C. M. , Redmon , W. K. and Mawhinney , T. C. 51 – 67 . Binghamton, NY : Haworth .
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski , S. W. J. , Gully , S. M. , Nason , E. R. and Smith , E. M. 1999 . “ Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance over time ” . In The changing nature of work and performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development , Edited by: Ilgen , D. R. and Pulakos , E. D. 240 – 292 . San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Landy , F. J. , Barnes , J and Murphy , K. 1978 . Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy in performance appraisal . Journal of Applied Psychology , 63 : 751 – 754 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy , F. J. and Farr , J. L. 1980 . Performance rating . Psychological Bulletin , 87 : 72 – 107 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latane , B. , Williams , K. and Harkins , S. 1979 . Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 : 822 – 832 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham , G. P. , Wexley , K. N. and Pursell , E. P. 1975 . Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior . Journal of Applied Psychology , 65 : 422 – 427 .
   Google Scholar
• Locke , E. A. and Latham , G. P. 1990 . A theory of goal setting and task performance , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Meyer , H. H. , Kay , E. and French , J. R. P. 1965 . Split roles in performance appraisals . Harvard Business Review , 43 : 123 – 129 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy , K. R. and Balzer , W. K. 1989 . Rater errors and rating accuracy . Journal of Applied Psychology , 74 : 619 – 624 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy , K. R. and Cleveland , J. N. 1995 . Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Naylor , J. C. , Pritchard , R. D. and Ilgen , D. R. 1980 . A theory of behavior in organizations , New York, NY : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Organ , D. 1988 . Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome , Lexington, MA : Lexington Books .
   Google Scholar
• Porter , C. 2005 . Goal orientation: Effects on backing-up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams . Journal of Applied Psychology , 90 : 811 – 818 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard , R. D. , Holling , H. , Lammers , F. and Clark , B. D. , eds. 2002 . Improving organizational performance with the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System: An international collaboration , Huntington, NY : Nova Science .
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard , R. D. , Jones , S. D. , Roth , P. L. , Steubing , K. K. and Ekeberg , S. E. 1988 . The effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity . Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph , 73 : 337 – 358 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos , E. D. 1984 . A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training . Journal of Applied Psychology , 69 : 581 – 588 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos , E. D. 2004 . A roadmap for developing, implementing, and evaluating performance management systems , Alexandria, VA : SHRM Foundation .
   Google Scholar
• Pulakos , E. D. 2009 . Performance management: A new approach for driving business results , Madden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Saavedra , R. , Earley , P. C. and Van Dyne , L. 1993 . Complex interdependence in task-performing groups . Journal of Applied Psychology , 78 : 61 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , P. C. and Kendall , L. M. 1963 . Retranslations of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales . Journal of Applied Psychology , 47 : 149 – 155 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smither , J. W. , ed. 1998 . Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice , San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Sulsky , L. M. and Balzer , W. K. 1998 . The meaning and measurement of performance appraisal accuracy: Some methodological concerns . Journal of Applied Psychology , 73 : 497 – 506 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , M. S. , Tracy , K. B. , Renard , M. K. , Harrison , J. K. and Carroll , S. J. 1995 . Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice . Administrative Science Quarterly , 40 : 495 – 523 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike , E. L. 1920 . A constant error in psychological ratings . Journal of Applied Psychology , 4 : 469 – 477 .
   Google Scholar
• Van Scotter , J. R. , Motowidlo , S. J. and Cross , T. C. 2000 . Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systematic rewards . Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 : 526 – 535 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma , A. , DeNisi , A. S. and Peters , L. H. 1996 . Interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: A field study . Personnel Psychology , 49 : 341 – 360 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz , J. 1961 . Criteria for criteria . American Psychologist , 16 : 228 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , K. J. , DeNisi , A. S. , Blencoe , A. G. and Cafferty , T. P. 1985 . The role of appraisal purpose: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilization . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 35 : 314 – 339 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar