The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on the Consumer Purchasing Situation

REFERENCES

• Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. doi:10.2307/1252190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusseau, J., Chiagouris, L., & Brusseau, R. F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: To yourself be true. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 9(1), 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrzan, K. (1994). Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 5(2), 165–172. doi:10.1007/BF00994106
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creyer, E. H. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432. doi:10.1108/07363769710185999
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393–406. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerstrøm, A., Foxall, G. R., & Arntzen, E. (2010). Implications of motivating operations for the functional analysis of consumer choice. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 110–126. doi:10.1080/01608061003756331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (Ed.). (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R. (2004). Consumer psychology in behavioral perspective (1st ed.). Frederick, MD: Beard Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R. (2005). Understanding consumer choice (1st ed.). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R. (2010). Interpreting consumer choice: The behavioral perspective model. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R., & Greenley, G. E. (1998). The affective structure of consumer situations. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 781–798. doi:10.1177/001391659803000603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. doi:10.1086/586910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. doi:10.1086/jcr.1978.5.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, M. J., & Sequeira, S. (2011). Consumer demand for the fair trade label: Evidence from a field experiment (Research Paper No. 2011-9B). Retrieved from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/sequeira/SSRN-id1801942.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in business-to-business markets: How organizational customers account for supplier corporate social responsibility engagement. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 54–72. doi:10.1509/jm.12.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, C., Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., & Lefebvre, C. (2014). The catch-22 of responsible luxury: Effects of luxury product characteristics on consumers’ perception of fit with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 45–57. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1621-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, K. G., Drozdenko, R., & DeLoughy, S. (2013). The role of corporate value clusters in ethics, social responsibility, and performance: A study of financial professionals and implications for the financial meltdown. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 15–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1227-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2007). Marketing and corporate social responsibility within food stores. British Food Journal, 18(4), 582–593. doi:10.1108/00070700710772381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9507312924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juscius, V., Sneideriene, A., & Griauslyte, J. (2013). Assessment of the benefits of corporate social responsibility reports as one of the marketing tools. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 3(11), 88–99.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Brady, M., Goodman, M., & Hansen, T. (2012). Marketing management (2nd ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(3), 407–414. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 193–195. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2008). Do well by doing good? Don’t count on it. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 19–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R., Laraway, S., & Austin, J. (2001). Unconditioned and conditioned establishing operations in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(2), 7–35. doi:10.1300/J075v21n02_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overskeid, G. (2008). They should have thought about the consequences: The crisis of cognitivism and a second chance for behavior analysis. The Psychological Record, 58, 131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekom, J. V., Berens, G., & Halderen, M. V. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: Playing to win, or playing not to lose? Doing good by increasing the social benefits of a company’s core activities. Journal of Brand Management, 20(9), 800–814. doi:10.1057/bm.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• Schlinger, H. D., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10(1), 41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Vallaster, C., Lindgreen, A., & Maon, F. (2012). Strategically leveraging corporate social responsibility: A corporate branding perspective. California Management Review, 54(3), 34–60. doi:10.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenhao, C., & Kaufman, K. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in fortune magazine’s top 50 companies: State of action and salient trends. African Journal of Business Management, 5(29), 11636–11651. doi:10.5897/AJBM11.1314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigley, S. (2008). Gauging consumers’ responses to CSR activities: Does increased awareness make cents? Public Relations Review, 34(3), 306–308. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.03.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P., & Kriewall, M. A. (1980). State-of-mind effects on the accuracy with which utility functions predict marketplace choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(3), 277–293. doi:10.2307/3150526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (Eds.). (1982). Rule governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavior therapy (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar