Objective Performance Feedback: Is Numerical Accuracy Necessary?

REFERENCES

• Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985-1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 3–29. doi:10.1300/J075v21n01_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, D. C., & Karas, G. G. (1967). Performance on a vigilance task under conditions of true and false knowledge of results. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 25(1), 129–138. doi:10.2466/pms.1967.25.1.129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcazar, F. E., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1985–1986). A critical, objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(3–4), 65–89. doi:10.1300/J075v07n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C. G., Forehand, R., & Zegiob, L. E. (1979). A review of observer reactivity in adult-child interactions. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1(2), 167–178. doi:10.1007/BF01322022
   Google Scholar
• Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(1), 95–116. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, N. T., McGee, H. M., Huitema, B. E., & Dickinson, A. M. (2015). The effects of the temporal placement of feedback on performance. The Psychological Record, 65(3), 425–434. doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0117-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beedie, C. J., Lane, A. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2012). A possible role for emotion and emotion regulation in physiological responses to false performance feedback in 10 mile laboratory cycling. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 269–277. doi:10.1007/s10484-012-9200-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackett, L., Reid, D. H., & Green, C. W. (2007). Effects of reactivity to observations on staff performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(1), 191–195. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.112-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. C. (2000). Bringing out the best in people (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. C., & Daniels, J. E. (2004). Performance management: Changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness (4th ed.). Tucker, GA: Performance Management.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, J., Arnold, T., & Eston, R. (2011). Effect of accurate and inaccurate distance feedback on performance markers and pacing strategies during running. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21, e176–e183. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner, D. J., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1984). A behavioral analysis of goal setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 6(1), 33–51. doi:10.1300/J075v06n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Filipkowski, M., & Johnson, C. M. (2008). Comparisons of performance and job insecurity in union and nonunion sites of a manufacturing company. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28(4), 218–237. doi:10.1080/01608060802454437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, L. W. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of organizational behavior management. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, R. L., Craighead, W. E., & Paul, G. L. (1975). Staff reactivity to evaluative behavioral observations. Behavior Therapy, 6, 201–205. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(75)80141-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, J. M., & DiGennaro-Reed, F. D. (2015). An examination of the effects of feedback accuracy on academic task acquisition in analogue settings. The Psychological Record, 65, 49–65. doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0087-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, J. M., DiGennaro-Reed, F. D., & Reed, D. D. (2013). Effects of varying feedback accuracy on task acquisition: A computerized translational study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9162-0
   Google Scholar
• Houmanfar, R. (2013). Performance feedback: From component analysis to application. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33(2), 85–88. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.787002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. M., Redmon, W. K., & Mawhinney, T. C. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of organizational performance: Behavior analysis and management. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A. (2013). A component analysis of the impact of evaluative and objective feedback on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33(2), 89–103. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.785879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Huitema, B. E. (2008). The effects of objective feedback on performance when individuals receive fixed and individual incentive pay. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3–4), 53–74. doi:10.1002/piq.20003
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A., Rocheleau, J. M., & Tilka, R. E. (in press). Considerations in feedback delivery: The role of accuracy and type of evaluation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 35(3-4).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, K., Oah, S., & Dickinson, A. M. (2005). The relative effects of different frequencies of feedback on work performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23(4), 21–53. doi:10.1300/J075v23n04_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki, J., & Goltz, S. M. (2001). Within-group research designs: Going beyond program evaluation questions. In C. M. Johnson, W. K. Redmon, & T. C. Mawhinney (Eds.), Handbook of organizational performance: Behavior analysis and management (pp. 81–123). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, C., & Canter, A. (1977). Time and false electromyographic feedback: Effect on tension headache. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(1), 93–95. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.86.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitner, R., Reif, W. E., & Morris, M. (1977). Measuring the impact of feedback on the performance of mental health technicians. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1(1), 105–109. doi:10.1300/J075v01n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Krumhus, K. M., & Malott, R. W. (1980). The effects of modeling and immediate and delayed feedback in staff training. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2(4), 279–293. doi:10.1300/J075v02n04_05
   Google Scholar
• Lebbon, A. R., & Austin, J. (2013). A preliminary examination of the effects of observer presence on work-related behavior in a simulated office. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33, 185–199. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.815095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., & Kreitner, R. (1985). Organizational behavior modification and beyond. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Mackworth, J. F. (1964). The effect of true and false knowledge of results on the detectability of signals in a vigilance task. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 18(2), 106–117. doi:10.1037/h0083493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malott, R. W. (1992). A theory of rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 45–65. doi:10.1300/J075v12n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Malott, R. W. & Shane, J. T. (2013). Principles of behavior. Seventh Edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mangiapanello, K. A., & Hemmes, N. S. (2015). An analysis of feedback from a behavior analytic perspective. The Behavior Analyst, 38(1), 51–75. doi:10.1007/s40614-014-0026-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. A., & Redmon, W. K. (1993). Effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on error detection accuracy in a quality control simulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 13(1), 49–83. doi:10.1300/J075v13n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, G. R., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Wallace, M. (2013). Behavior analysis for lasting change. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, H. M., Dickinson, A. M., Huitema, B. E., & Culig, K. M. (2006). The effects of individual and group monetary incentives on high performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(4), 107–130. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2006.tb00387.x
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2004). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Kalamazoo, MI: Association for Behavior Analysis International.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. O., Kapust, J. A., & Dorsey, B. L. (1978). Minimal reactivity of overt classroom observations on student and teacher behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 9, 695–702. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(78)80001-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestoriuc, Y., Martin, A., Rief, W., & Andrasik, F. (2008). Biofeedback treatment for headache disorders: A comprehensive efficacy review. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 33(3), 125–140. doi:10.1007/s10484-008-9060-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M., Dickinson, A. M., & Rosow, M. P. (Eds.). (1982). Industrial behavior modification: A management handbook. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pampino, R. N., MacDonald, J. E., Mullin, J. E., & Wilder, D. A. (2004). Weekly feedback vs. daily feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23(2–3), 21–43. doi:10.1300/J075v23n02_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretti, P. O. (1970). Effects on reaction time of random-false knowledge of results of performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30(3), 838. doi:10.2466/pms.1970.30.3.838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, N. (1982). Feedback is not a new principle of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 101–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prue, D. M., & Fairbank, J. A. (1981). Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3(1), 1–16. doi:10.1300/J075v03n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Shull, R. L. (2011). Bouts, changeovers, and units of operant behavior. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12(1), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Shull, R. L., Gaynor, S. T., & Grimes, J. A. (2001). Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: Effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75(3), 247–274. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.75-247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Slowiak, J. M., Dickinson, A. M., & Huitema, B. E. (2011). Self-solicited feedback: Effects of hourly pay and individual monetary incentive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31(1), 3–20. doi:10.1080/01608061.2011.541816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, Y., Lee, K., & Oah, S. (2013). Relative effects of daily feedback and weekly feedback on customer service behavior at a gas station. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33(2), 137–151. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.785898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanStelle, S. E., Vicars, S. M., Harr, V., Miguel, C. F., Koerber, J. L., Kazbour, R., & Austin, J. (2012). The publication history of the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management: An objective review and analysis: 1998-2009. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 32(2), 93–123. doi:10.1080/01608061.2012.675864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, L., & Fairclough, S. H. (2009). The influence of performance feedback on goal-setting and mental effort regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 63–74. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9116-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherly, N. L., & Malott, R. W. (2008). An analysis of organizational behavior management research in terms of the three-contingency model of performance management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28(4), 260–285. doi:10.1080/01608060802454643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidenfeller, E. W., Baker, R. A., & Ware, J. R. (1962). Effects of knowledge of results (true and false) on vigilance performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 14, 211–215. doi:10.2466/pms.1962.14.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. R. (2000). Dow chemical fires 50 workers for sending pornographic e-mail. Retrieved from the Computerworld website: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2596891/enterprise-applications/dow-chemical-fires-50-workers-for-sending-pornographic-e-mail.html
   Google Scholar