A Behavioral Interpretation of Situation Awareness: Prospects for Organizational Behavior Management

References

• Alavosius, M. P., Houmanfar, R., & Rodriquez, N. J. (2005). Unity of purpose/Unity of effort: Private-sector preparedness in times of terror. Disaster Prevention and Management, November, 14, 666–680. doi:10.1108/09653560510634098
   Google Scholar
• Andre, A. D., Wickens, C. D., Moorman, L., & Boschelli, M. M. (1991). Display formatting techniques for improving situation awareness in the aircraft cockpit. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 205–218. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0103_2
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., & Delaney, P. F. (1998). Protocol analysis as a tool for behavior analysis. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 41–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumgartner, N., Gottesheim, W., Mitsch, S., Retschitzegger, W., & Schwinger, W. (2010). BeAware! – Situation awareness, the ontology-driven way. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 69(11), 1181–1193. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2010.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzad, B., & Mann, D. D. (2014). Automation and the situation awareness of drivers in agricultural semi-autonomous vehicles. Biosystems Engineering, 124, 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem-solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 205–223. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C. E. (1995). Situation awareness measurement and analysis: A commentary. In D. J. Garland, & M. R. Endsley (Eds.), Experimental analysis and measurement of Situation Awareness. Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1986). Automaticity: The hands and feet of genius. Educational Leadership, 43(5), 70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carol, L. A. (1992). Desperately seeking SA. TAC Attack, 32(3), 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., Kinsman, L., Buykx, P., McConnell-Henry, T., Endacot, R., & Scholes, J. (2010). Managing the deteriorating patient in a simulated environment: Nursing students’ knowledge, skill and situation awareness. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(15–16), 2309–2318. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03164.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. M., & Johnston, J. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 289–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., & Dattel, A. (2004). SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA. In S. Banbury, & S. Trembley (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measures and application (pp. 137–154). New York, NY: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., & Gronlund, S. D. (1999). Situation awareness. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, R. W. Schvanveldt, S. T. Dumais, D. S. Lindsay, & M. T. H. Chi (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 283–314). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., Hackworth, C. A., Truitt, T. R., Crutchfield, J., Nikolic, D., & Manning, C. A. (1998). Situation awareness as a predictor of performance for en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 6, 1–20. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijapo2_6
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1987). SAGAT: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness (NOR DOC 87-83). Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1988a). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the human factors society 32nd annual meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1988b). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the national aerospace and electronics conference (NAECON) (pp. 789–795). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995a). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65–84. doi:10.1518/001872095779049499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Jones, D. G. (2011). Designing for situation awareness: An approach for user-centered design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., Mogford, R., Allendoerfer, K., Snyder, M. D., & Stein, E. S. (1997). Effect of free flight conditions on controller performance, workload and situation awareness: A preliminary investigation of changes in locus of control using existing technology (DOT/FAA/CT-TN 97/12). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, R. (2014). From relays to microcontrollers: The adoption of new technology in operant research. The Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 127–153.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, R. F., & Flateau, C. (1992). Night flying. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: TAB Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, E. C. (1980). Practicing practices: Learning by activity. Journal of Precision Teaching, 1(3), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, L. J. (1992). The psychological present. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, L. J. (2001). Finding our place in the constructed future. In L. J. Hayes, J. A. Austin, R. Houmanfar, & M. C. Clayton (Eds.), Organizational Change. Reno, NV: Context Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog - verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon’s Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363. doi:10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K., Herbst, S., Bond, F. W., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006). Expanding the scope of organizational behavior management: Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of complex behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26(1–2), 1–23. doi:10.1300/J075v26n01_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., White, D., & Bissett, R. T. (1998). Protocol analysis and the “silent dog” method of analyzing the impact of self-generated rules. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 57–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ikuma, L. H., Harvey, C., Taylor, C. F., & Handal, C. (2014). A guide for assessing control room operator performance using speed and accuracy, perceived workload, situation awareness, and eye tracking. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 32, 454–465. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2015). Behavioral education in the 21st century. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 135–150. doi:10.1080/01608061.2015.1036152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. J., & Layng, T. V. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. J., & Street, E. M. (2004). The Morningside model of generative instruction: What it means to leave no child behind. Concord, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (2008). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, S. J., Cole, K. S., & Stanny, C. J. (2007). Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10, 321–329. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubina, R., & Yurich, K. (2012). Behavioral fluency. In The precision teaching book (pp. 317–347). Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsley, O. R. (1998). Learning channels next: Let’s go! Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 15, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Loft, S., & Morrell, D. B. (2013). Using the situation present assessment method to measure situation awareness in simulated submarine track management. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2, 33–48. doi:10.1504/ijhfe.2013.055975
   Google Scholar
• Ma, R., & Kaber, D. B. (2005). Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(10), 939–953. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P., Tregunno, D., Brydges, R., Pittini, R., Tarshis, J., Kurrek, M., … Ryzynski, A. (2015). Using a situational awareness global assessment technique for interprofessional obstetrical team training with high fidelity simulation. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29, 13–19. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.936371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omnasch, L., Wickens, C. D., Li, H., & Manzey, D. (2014). Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. Human Factors, 56(3), 476–488. doi:10.1177/0018720813501549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate, M. L., Wardlow, G. W., & Johnson, D. M. (2004). Effects of thinking aloud pair problem solving on the troubleshooting performance of undergraduate agriculture students in a power technology course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4), 1–11. doi:10.5032/jae.2004.04001
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W., Roy, R., & Bianchi, S. (2014). Computer programming for research and application: Livecode development environment. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 154–191.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R., Flin, R., & Cleland, J. (2015). “Everything was fine”*: An analysis of the drill crew’s situation awareness on Deepwater Horizon. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 38, 87–100. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R., Flin, R., & Cleland, J. (2016). How to recognise a kick: A cognitive task analysis of drillers’ situation awareness during well operations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 43, 503–513. Retrieved July 9, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L., & Young, M. (2009). Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study. International Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(3), 490–500. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlinger, H. D. (1995). A behavior-analytic view of child development. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Random House, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Hancock, P. A. (1995). Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37, 137–148. doi:10.1518/001872095779049444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman, M., & Mathna, E. K. (2009). Metacognitive strategy training improves driving situation awareness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(9), 1161–1170. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.9.1161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens-Adams, S., Cole, K., Haass, M., Warrender, C., Jeffers, R., Burnham, L., & Forsythe, C. (2015). Situation awareness and automation in the electric grid control room. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5277–5284. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.609
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Osnes, P. G. (1989). An operant pursuit of generalization. Behavior Therapy, 20, 337–355. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(89)80054-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techsmith. (2016). Camtasia (Version 2.10.5). Okemos, MI: TechSmith Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.Techsmith.com
   Google Scholar
• Twyman, J. S. (2014). Envisioning education 3.0: The fusion of behavior analysis and learning science and technology. The Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• van de Merwe, K., Oprins, E., Eriksson, F., & van der Platt, A. (2012). The influence of automation support on performance, workload, and situation awareness of air traffic controllers. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 22(2), 120–143. doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.663241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whimbey, A., & Lochhead, J. (1999). Problem solving and comprehension (6th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1995). The tradeoff of design for routine and unexpected performance: Implications of situation awareness. In M. R. Endsley, & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 190–202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008). Situation awareness: Review of Mica Endsley’s 1995 articles on situation awareness theory and measurement. Human Factors, 50(3), 397–403. doi:10.1518/001872008X288420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfert, E., Greenway, D. E., Farkas, P., Hayes, S. C., & Dougher, S. C. (1994). Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(4), 659–671. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, L. B., Jr. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning: Part I. Psychological Review, 59, 431–442. doi:10.1037/h0053932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar