Evaluating the Temporal Location of Feedback: Providing Feedback Following Performance vs. Prior to Performance

References

• Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985-1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 3–29. doi:10.1300/J075v21n01_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2007). Evaluation of e-mail feedback on the verbal behaviors of pre-service teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(1), 55–72. doi:10.1177/105381510703000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, N., McGee, H., Huitema, B., & Dickinson, A. (2015). The effects of the temporal placement of feedback on performance. Psychological Record, 65(3), 425–434. doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0117-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely, M. R. (2001). A survey of levels of supervisory support and maintenance of effects reported by educators involved in direct instruction implementations. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Carnin, D. W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, A. M., & McWilliam, R. A. (2011). The characteristics and effectiveness of feedback interventions applied in early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(2), 68–77. doi:10.1177/0271121410368141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., Morin, J., & Stephens, J. T. (2005). Special education student teaching practices. Special Education Student Teaching Practices, 49(3), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, G., & Grossen, B. (1997). The effectiveness of in-class instructive feedback versus after-class instructive feedback for teachers learning Direct Instruction teaching behaviors. Effective School Practices, 16, 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. C., & Bailey, J. S. (2014). Performance management: Changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness (5th ed.). Atlanta, GA: Aubrey Daniels International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (1999). Language for learning. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., & Sugai, G. (1983). Teacher training: Improving trainee performance through peer observation and observation system technology. Teacher Education and Special Education: the Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 6(1), 7–17. doi:10.1177/088840648300600102
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A. (2013). A component analysis of the impact of evaluative and objective feedback on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33, 89–103. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.785879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Huitema, B. E. (2008). The effects of objective feedback on performance when individuals receive fixed and individual incentive pay. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3/4), 53–74. doi:10.1002/piq.20003
   Google Scholar
• Kreitner, R., Reif, W. E., & Morris, M. (1977). Measuring the impact of feedback on the performance of mental health technicians. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1(1), 105–109. doi:10.1300/J075v01n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(3), 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Malott, R. W. (1992). A theory of rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Malott, R. W. (2008). Principles of Behavior (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mangiapanello, K. A., & Hemmes, N. S. (2015). An analysis of feedback from a behavior analytic perspective. The Behavior Analyst, 38(1), 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (1992). Preservice teacher performance in a Direct Instruction practicum using student teachers and university personnel as supervisors. Direct Instruction News, 11(3), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (1997). Reliability of observations done by cooperating teacher supervisors in a Direct Instruction practicum. Effective School Practices, 16(4), 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand-Martella, N. E., Slocum, T. A., & Martella, R. C. (2004). Introduction to direct instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(4), 401–410.
   Google Scholar
• MOOSES™ Overview. (n.d.). Inter-observer agreement. Retrieved from http://mooses.vueinnovations.com/overview/mooses-overview
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M. F. (1993). An analysis of behavioural supervision for teaching systematic instruction skills to preservice teachers in practicum settings. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 233–252. doi:10.1080/03033910.1993.10557928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M. F., Renzaglia, A., & Lee, S. (1994). An analysis of acquisition, generalization and maintenance of systematic instruction competencies by preservice teachers using behavioral supervision techniques. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. H., Fredrick, L. D., & Shippen, M. E. (2004). Training a paraprofessional to implement Spelling Mastery and examining its effectiveness for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4(2), 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, N. (1982). Feedback is not a new principle of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5(1), 101–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Thead, B. K., Acker, S. E., Gable, R. A., & Zigmond, N. P. (2009). Can you hear me now? Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 32(1), 64–82. doi:10.1177/0888406408330872
   Google Scholar
• Runnion, A., Johnson, T., & McWhorter, J. (1978). The effects of feedback and reinforcement on truck turnaround time in materials transportation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1(2), 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., & Lee, D. L. (2002). Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., McAfee, J. K., Ruhl, K. L., & Lee, D. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(1), 12–25. doi:10.1177/088840640602900103
   Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., McKinnon, K., & Stout, J. (2012). Effects of immediate feedback delivered via webcam and bug-in-ear technology on preservice teacher performance. Teacher Education and Special Education: the Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 35(1), 77–90. doi:10.1177/0888406411401919
   Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(3), 59–70. doi:10.1177/088840640402700407
   Google Scholar
• Slowiak, J. M., Dickinson, A. M., & Huitema, B. E. (2011). Self-solicited feedback: Effects of hourly pay and individual monetary incentive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31, 3–20. doi:10.1080/01608061.2011.541816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(1), 25–31. doi:10.3758/BF03203616
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. L., & Slocum, T. A. (2003). The components of direct instruction. Journal of Direct Instruction, 3(2), 75–110.
   Google Scholar