COMMENTARY: Integrating Behavioral Science with Process Safety Management

References

• Alavosius, M., Herbst, S., Dagen, J., & Rafacz, S. (2014). “Beyond the skinner box”: Expanding behavior systems analyses. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 34(February 2015), 255–264. doi:10.1080/01608061.2014.973633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amyotte, P. R., & Lupien, C. S. (2017). Elements of process safety management. In Methods in chemical process safety (Vol. 1, pp. 87–148). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcps.2017.01.004
   Google Scholar
• ANSI. (2009). ANSI/ISA-18.2-2009 management of alarm systems for the process industries. Research Triangle Park, NC: The International Society of Automation.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood, D., Khan, F., & Veitch, B. (2006). Occupational accident models––Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(6), 664–682. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20(4), 313–327. doi:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCPS. (2007). Process safety leading and lagging metrics. Retrieved from https://www.aiche.org/sites/default/files/docs/embedded-pdf/CCPS_ProcessSafety2011_2-24-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crowl, D. A. (2007). Human factors methods for improving performance in the process industries. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. C., Daniels, J., & Abernathy, B. (2006). The leader’s role in pay systems and organizational performance. Compensation & Benefits Review, 38(3), 56–60. doi:10.1177/0886368706288217
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, S. (2004). Why we need new accident models. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 4(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, J. (2016). Human factors in the chemical and process industries: Making it work in practice. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• EEMUA. (2013). Alarm systems––A guide to design, management and procurement. London: Engineering Equipment and Materials Users’ Association.
   Google Scholar
• EuroControl. (2014). Systems thinking for safety: Ten principles a white paper. moving towards safety-II. Retrieved from http://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2882.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gallivan, S., Taxis, K., Franklin, B., & Barber, N. (2008). Is the principle of a stable heinrich ratio a myth? Drug Safety, 31(8), 637–642. doi:10.2165/00002018-200831080-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravina, N., Cummins, B., & Austin, J. (2017). Leadership’s role in process safety: An understanding of Behavioral science among managers and executives is needed. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(3–4), 316–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, A., & Borys, D. (2012a). Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety Science, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, A., & Borys, D. (2012b). Working to rule or working safely? Part 2: The management of safety rules and procedures. Safety Science. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The functional resonance analysis method: modelling complex socio-technical systems. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety–II: The past and future of safety management. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hyten, C., & Ludwig, T. (2017). Complacency in process safety: A Behavior analysis toward prevention strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37,(3–4), 240–260.
   Google Scholar
• IOGP. (2016). Safety performance indicators. Process safety events––2015 data. London: International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.
   Google Scholar
• Kolditz, T. A. (2007). In extremis leadership: Leading as if your life depended on it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kontogiannis, T. (2010). A contemporary view of organizational safety: Variability and interactions of organizaitonal processes. Cognition, Technology & Work, 12(4), 231–249. doi:10.1007/s10111-009-0131-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebbon, A., & Sigurdsson, S. (2017). Behavioral perspectives on variability in human behavior as part of process safety. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(3–4), 261–282.
   Google Scholar
• Leveson, N. (2001). Evaluating accident models using recent aerospace accidents, part 1: Event-based models. Retrieved from http://sunnyday.mit.edu/accidents/nasa-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leveson, N. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 237–270. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T. (2017). Process safety behavioral systems: Behaviors interlock in complex process safety meta-contingencies. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(3–4), 224–239.
   Google Scholar
• Manuele, F. A. (2002). Heinrich revisited: Truisms or myths. National Safety Council. Retrieved from http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=N-0OAAAACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Meister, D. (1999). The history of human factors and ergonomics. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McSween, T., & Moran, D. (2017). Assessing and preventing serious Incidents with behavioral science. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(3–4), 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• OEDC. (2012). Corporate governance for process safety (p. 23). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, Z. H. (2008). A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-technical systems (No. DSTO-TR-2094). Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV86Qureshi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robb, M., & Miller, G. (2012). Human factors engineering in oil and gas––A review of industry guidance. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 752–762. doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-0236-752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez, M., Bell, J., Brown, M., & Carter, D. (2017). Integrating behavioral science with human factors to address process safety. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(3–4), 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Taxis, K., Gallivan, S., Barber, N., & Franklin, B. D. (2005). Can the Heinrich ratio be used to predict harm from medication errors? Report to the Patient Safety Research Programme (Policy Research Programme of the Department of Health). Retrieved from http://eprints.pharmacy.ac.uk/764/1/BarberMedication_Errors.pdf
   Google Scholar