A Mutual Aid Group Program for Women Who Use Violence

REFERENCES

• Barker, R. L. (2003). The social work dictionary (5th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. (2009, February). Smuggling intersectionality into the study of masculinity: Some methodological challenges. Paper presented at Feminist Research Method: An International Conference, University of Stockholm, Sweden. Abstract retrieved from http://www.kvinfo.su.se/femmet09/papers/pdf/Bilge_revised.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgouin, M.-E. (2004). Fonctionnement et efficacité du programme Temps d’Arrêt: Le point de vue des participantes [Experiences of women and effectivenness of a women’s violence group]. Masters Abstracts International, 43(4), 1147.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, C. E. (2006). Examining the impact cognitive-behavioral curricula on the lives of juvenile female offenders: A two-site case study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A, Humanities and Social Sciences, 67(9), 3354.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, M., & Buttel, F. (2004). A multidimensional evaluation of a treatment program for female batterers: A pilot study. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 249–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M., & Buttel, F. (2006). An evaluation of court-mandated batterer intervention program: Investigating differential program effects for African American and white women. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. R. Forcey (Eds.), Mothering. Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 45–66). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, A., Hoffman, S., & Leschied, A. W. (2004). A psychoeducational group for aggressive adolescent girls. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 29, 285–299.
   Google Scholar
• Damant, D., & Guay, F. (2005). La question de la symétrie dans les enquêtes en violence conjugale [Symmetry in domestic violence investigations]. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 42, 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Damant, D., Guay, F., Cantin, S., Thibault, S., & Shaw, M. (2004). La violence exercée par des femmes: L’expérience et les pratiques des intervenantes travaillant auprès des femmes dans un cadre communautaire [Violence used by women: Experiences and practices of workers in a community setting]. Québec, Canada: Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur la Violence Familiale et la Violence Faite aux Femmes.
   Google Scholar
• Damant, D., Lapierre, S., Kouraga, A., Fortin, A., Hamelin-Brabant, L., Lavergne, C., & Lessard, G. (2008). Taking child abuse and mothering into account: Intersectional feminism as an alternative for the study of domestic violence. Affilia, 23, 123–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, D. S. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate partner violence: Does similar behavior imply similar constructs? Violence Against Women, 8, 1364–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, L., & Leisring, P. A. (2008). A framework for treating partner aggressive women. Violence and Victims, 23, 249–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enander, V. (2011). Violent women? The challenge of women’s violence in intimate partner heterosexual relationships to feminist analyses of partner violence. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19, 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, M. J., Terzian, M. A., & Fraser, M. W. (2006). The art of group work practice with manualized curricula. Social Work with Groups, 29(1), 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research: Methodological and ethical issues. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, E. (1994). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. R. Forcey (Eds.), Mothering. Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenson, J., Spidel, A., Greaves, C., & Dutton, D. (2009). Female perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Within-group heterogeneity, related psychopathology, and a review of current treatment with recommendations for the future. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 18, 752–769.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Québec. (1995). Politique d’intervention en matière de violence conjugale. Prévenir. Dépister. Contrer la violence conjugale [Domestic violence intervention policy. Prevention. Screening. Combatting domestic violence]. Québec, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Québec. (2012). Prévenir. Dépister. Contrer. Plan d’action gouvernemental 2012–2017 en matière de violence conjugale [Prevention. Screening. Combatting. Quebec government action plan on domestic violence 2012–2017]. Québec, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kernsmith, P., & Kernsmith, R. (2009). Treating female perpetrators: State standards for batterer intervention services. Social Work, 54, 341–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krane, J. & Davies, L. (2000). Mothering and child protection practice: Rethinking risk assessment. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, D., & Morton, M. (2009). Reflecting on community/academic ‘collaboration’: The challenge of ‘doing’ feminist participatory action research. Action Research, 7, 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre, S., Moreau, N., & Larose-Hébert, K. (2011). La psychologisation de l’intervention sociale: Enjeux et perspectives [Psycholization of social intervention: Issues and perspectives]. Reflets: Revue d’Intervention sociale et Communautaire, 17(1), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, J. (1998). Caught in tangled webs of care: Women abused in intimate relationships. In C. Baines, P. Evans, & S. Neysmith (Eds.), Women’s caring: Feminist perspectives on social welfare (pp. 139–159). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (2001). Evaluation of the RYSE program: A report prepared for Alameda county probation departement. Oakland, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman-Martinez, J., Krane, J., & Corbin, N. (2002). Competing conceptions of conjugal Violence: Insights from an intersectional framework. Montreal, Canada: McGill University, Centre for Applied Family Study.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, V., Damant, D., Chbat, M., Gervais, L., & Johnson, H. (2013, August). Evaluating programs for women who use violence: Viewpoints of female participants and facilitators who took part in a Québec group program. Jyväskylä, Finland: Interpersonal Violence Interventions - Social and Cultural Perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, D. M. (2004). The mutual-aid approach to working with groups: Helping people help one another (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tutty, L. M., Babins-Wagner, R., & Rothery, M. A. (2006). Group treatment for aggressive women: An initial evaluation. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker,T. (2013). Voices from the group: Violent women’s experiences of intervention. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1986). The Ottawa Charter for health promotion. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. M. (2003). Co-facilitation: Fashion or function. Social Work with Groups, 25(3), 77–92.
   Google Scholar