References
- Kearney, M. H., Baggs, J. G., Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M. C., & Freda, M. (2016). Rigorous peer review is worth the effort. Research in Nursing & Health, 39(6), 393–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21771
- Krlev, G., & Spicer, A. (2023). Reining in reviewer two: How to uphold epistemic respect in academia. Journal of Management Studies. Published online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12905
- Shattell, M. M., Chinn, P., Thomas, S. P., & Cowling, W. R. (2010). Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1011/j/1547-5069.01331.x
- Thomas, S. P. (2011). Conceptual debate and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.015
- Thomas, S. P. (2018). Current controversies regarding peer review in scholarly journals. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(2), 99–101. doi.org/10/1080/061. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1431443