Protocol Registration and Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Published in Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Journals: A Descriptive Study

References

• Andersen, M. Z., Fonnes, S., Andresen, K., & Rosenberg, J. (2021). Most published meta-analyses were made available within two years of protocol registration. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 44, 101342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2021.101342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. M., & Slutsky, J. (2012). Debunking myths of protocol registration. Systematic Reviews, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clavirate. (2022). Browse, search, and explore journals indexed in the Web of Science. https://mjl.clarivate.com/home
   Google Scholar
• El Hachimi, C., Belaqziz, S., Khabba, S., & Chehbouni, A. (2022). Data Science Toolkit: An all-in-one python library to help researchers and practitioners in implementing data science-related algorithms with less effort [Formula presented]. Software Impacts, 12, 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100240
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. (2021). Reply to: Why has the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing stopped publishing registered reports? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 28(2), 306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2018). Promoting openness and transparency in mental health nursing science. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 25(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2020). Why do all systematic reviews have fifteen studies? Nurse Author & Editor, 30(4), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.8
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Thompson, D. R., Tong Chien, W., Jones, M., Jones, A., Moyo, N., Waters, A., & Brown, E. (2021). Why has the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing stopped publishing registered reports? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 28(2), 305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Mar), 1157–1182.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Tian, J., Zhang, J., Yun, R., Zhang, Z., Chen, K. H., Zhang, C., & Wang, B. (2017). Quality of meta-analysis in nursing fields: An exploration based on the JBI guidelines. PloS One, 12(5), e0177648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaçam, Z. (2013). Systematic review methodology: A guide for preparation of systematic review. Deuhyo Ed, 6, 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Liberati, A., & Tetzlaff, J. (2011). PRISMA statement. Epidemiology, 22(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Barker, T. H., Moola, S., Tufanaru, C., Stern, C., McArthur, A., Stephenson, M., & Aromataris, E. (2020). Methodological quality of case series studies: An introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2127–2133. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oh, S. (2022). Predictive case-based feature importance and interaction. Information Sciences, 593, 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarela, M., & Jauhiainen, S. (2021). Comparison of feature importance measures as explanations for classification models. SN Applied Sciences, 3(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04148-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Henry, D. A., & Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideri, S., Papageorgiou, S. N., & Eliades, T. (2018). Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 100, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. (2013). Critical appraisal skills programme. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 4(1), 76–77. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.107697
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, L., Moher, D., & Shekelle, P. (2012). Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Systematic Reviews, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tawfik, G. M., Giang, H. T. N., Ghozy, S., Altibi, A. M., Kandil, H., Le, H. H., Eid, P. S., Radwan, I., Makram, O. M., Hien, T. T. T., Sherif, M., Hossain, A. S., Thang, T. L. L., Puljak, L., Salem, H., Numair, T., Moji, K., & Huy, N. T. (2020). Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: A survey of global researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01094-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto, Y., Tsujimoto, H., Kataoka, Y., Kimachi, M., Shimizu, S., Ikenoue, T., Fukuma, S., Yamamoto, Y., & Fukuhara, S. (2017). Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: A meta-epidemiological study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 84, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., Cheng, L. L., Liu, Y., Jia, P. L., Gao, M. Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: Empirical evidence from a literature survey. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0715-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar