- Cassidy, L., & Hurrell, R. M. (1995). The influence of victim's attire on adolescents' judgments of date rape. Adolescence, 30, 319–323.
- Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
- Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.) Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.) Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.
- Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.
- Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319–325.
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Fischer, G. J. (1987). Hispanic and majority student attitudes toward forcible date rape as a function of differences in attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 17, 93–101.
- Goodchilds, J. D., & Zellman, G. L. (1984). Sexual signaling and sexual aggression in adolescent relationships. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.) Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 233–243). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
- Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observers' attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875–895.
- Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). The effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290–314.
- Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 375–384.
- Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for them behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Korman, S. K. (1983). Nontraditional dating behavior: Date initiation and date expense-sharing among feminists and non-feminists. Family Relations, 32, 575–581.
- Mills, C. S., & Granoff, B. J. (1992). Date and acquaintance rape among a sample of college students. Journal of the National Association of Social Workers, 37, 504–509.
- Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.
- Muehlenhard, C. L. (1988). “Nice women” don't say yes and “real men” don't say no: How miscommunication and the double standard can cause sexual problems. Women and Therapy, 7, 95–108.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Felts, A. S. (in press). Sexual beliefs scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), A handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity: Who initiated, who paid and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297–309.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.
- Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
- Osman, S. L. (1994). Predispositional and situational factors influencing men's perceptions of date rape. Unpublished master's thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
- Osman, S. L. (1995, April). Predispositional and situational factors influencing men's perceptions of date rape. Paper presented at the eastern meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Atlantic City, NJ.
- Osman, S. L. (in press). The Token Resistance to Sex Scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), A handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926.
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Verlag; New York.
- Sandberg, G., Jackson, T. L., & Petretic-Jackson, P. (1987). College students' attitudes regarding sexual coercion and aggression: Developing educational and preventive strategies. Journal of College Student Personnel, 20, 302–311.
- Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimental based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232.
Journal of Sex Education and Therapy
Volume 22, 1997 - Issue 3