A Design Analysis of Indiana Public Library Homepages

REFERENCES

• Aharony, N. 2012. “An analysis of American academic libraries’ websites: 2000–2010.” The Electronic Library 30(6): 764–76. doi:10.1108/02640471211282091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anttiroiko, A.-V., and R. Savolainen. 2011. “Towards library 2.0: The adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in public libraries.” Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services 61(2): 87–99. doi:10.1515/libr.2011.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Research Libraries. 2014. Web accessibility toolkit | Making digital resources usable and accessible in research libraries. Association of Research Libraries. http://accessibility.arl.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, D. A., and L. Yannotta. 2013. “Modeling a library website redesign process: Developing a user-centered website through usability testing.” Information Technology and Libraries 32(1): 6–22. doi:10.6017/ital.v32i1.2311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng, F., and Y. Q. Liu. 2014. “Web 2.0 applications’ usage and trends in top US academic libraries.” Library Hi Tech 32(1): 120–38. doi:10.1108/LHT-07–2013–0093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brobst, J. 2009. “Evaluating the accessibility of Florida’s public library home pages.” Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services 59(2): 88–103. doi:10.1515/libr.2009.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B., M. Cooper, L. G. Reid, and G. Vanderheiden, eds. 2008. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, D. H. 2014. “Public library websites and adherence to senior-friendly guidelines.” Public Library Quarterly 33(2): 121–30. doi:10.1080/01616846.2014.910722.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, A. S., M. Bridges, and P. Commander. 2014. “The website design and usability of US academic and public libraries: Findings from a nationwide survey.” Reference and User Services Quarterly 53(3): 253–65. doi:10.5860/rusq.53n3.253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, W. 2013. “Library exposure from the prior years: An examination of public high school library websites.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39(5): 393–400. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, A.Y.K., and D. H. Goh. 2010. “A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites.” Library and Information Science Research 32(3): 203–11. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, H. 1999. “Evaluation of library web sites: The Danish case.” The Electronic Library 17(2): 83–87. doi:10.1108/02640479910329527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyde, L. A. 1996. “The library as information provider: The home page.” The Electronic Library 14(6): 549–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. B., and J. M. Still. 1999. “A comparison of research university and two-year college library web sites: Content, functionality, and form.” College and Research Libraries 60(3): 275–89. http://crl.acrl.org/content/60/3/275.full.pdf+html
   Google Scholar
• Detlor, B., and V. Lewis. 2006. “Academic library web sites: Current practice and future directions.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(3): 251–58. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, E. 2008. “Web site usability for rare book and manuscript libraries.” RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage 9(2): 168–81. http://rbm.acrl.org/content/9/2/168.full.pdf+html.
   Google Scholar
• Felker, K., and S. K. Chung. 2005. “‘If at first you don’t succeed … ’: Web Site redesign at the UNLV libraries.” Library Hi Tech 23(1): 50–65. doi:10.1108/07378830510586694.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, G., and M. Hooper. 2007. “Redesign for success: Developing a student centered website.” Tennessee Libraries 57(1): 1–13. http://www.tnla.org/associations/5700/files/garber.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. 2011. “Ontario public libraries, Accessibility, and justice: A capability approach.” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Services 35(4): 423–35. doi:10.1353/ils.2011.0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indiana State Library. 2014. ISL: Evergreen Indiana. Indiana State Library. http://www.in.gov/library/evergreen.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, E., R. A. Green, and J. Huprich. 2009. “How accessible are public libraries’ web sites? A study of Georgia public libraries.” Journal of Access Services 6(1/2): 101–15. doi:10.1080/15367960802247841.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. L., and K. Leonard. 2011. “Library homepage design at smaller bachelor of arts institutions.” Journal of Web Librarianship 5(1): 24–45. doi:10.1080/19322909.2011.546216.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. L., and A. Thorpe. 2014. “Library homepage design at medium-sized institutions.” Journal of Web Librarianship 8(1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/19322909.2014.850315.
   Google Scholar
• Kanazawa, M., Y. Maruyama, and A. Motoki. 2011. “An analysis of children’s web pages in public library web sites of Japan.” Public Library Quarterly 30(4): 270–85. doi:10.1080/01616846.2011.625587.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. L. 1998. “Library home page design: A comparison of page layout for front ends to ARL library web sites.” College and Research Libraries 59(5): 457–64. http://crl.acrl.org/content/59/5/457.full.pdf+html.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J. 2001. User-centered web development. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leggett, D. 2009. Quick usability checklist. UXBooth. http://www.uxbooth.com/articles/quick-usability-checklist/.
   Google Scholar
• Lilly, E. B., and C. Van Fleet. 2000. “Measuring the accessibility of public library home pages.” Reference and User Services Quarterly 40(2): 156–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzari, L., and J. Trinidad-Christensen. 2006. “User-centered design of a web site for library and information science students: Heuristic evaluation and usability testing.” Information Technology and Libraries 25(3): 163–69. http://www.ala.org/lita/ital/sites/ala.org.lita.ital/files/content/25/3/manzari.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, B. 2009. “Web design matters: 10 essentials for any library site.” Library Journal 134(3): 24–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellone, J. T., and D. J. Williams. 2010. “Applying best practices in web site redesign: The Queens College libraries experience.” OCLC Systems and Services 26(3): 177–97. doi:10.1108/10650751011073625.
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L. S. 2011. “Visibility of diversity within Association of Research Libraries worldwide.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 37(2): 101–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalec, M. 2006. “A content analysis of art library web sites.” Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America 25(2): 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M. 2014. “When you give students iPads, what will they do with them?” School Library Monthly 30(7): 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 2002. Top 10 guidelines for homepage usability. Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/top-ten-guidelines-for-homepage-usability/.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 2010. Scrolling and attention. Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/scrolling-and-attention/.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., and M. Tahir. 2002. Homepage usability: 50 websites deconstructed. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• “Noblesville schools gets $100K grant.” 2014. Times ( Noblesville, IN), March 1.
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. 2012. “How well do Ontario library web sites meet new accessibility requirements?” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 7(1): 1–17. https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/1613#.U9K9yPldU3N.
   Google Scholar
• Persichini, G., M. Samuelson, and L. B. Zeiter. 2008. “e-branch in a box: How Idaho libraries created an easy and sustainable web presence.” PNLA Quarterly 72(2):6, 18–19. http://www.pnla.org/assets/documents/Quarterly/pnla_winter08.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, B. S. 2011. “Oh, what a tangled web we weave! An evaluation of Pennsylvania’s public library websites for a basic level of web presence and beyond.” Current Studies in Librarianship 31(1): 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, T. 2013. “Growing readers: A critical analysis of early literacy content for parents on Canadian public library websites.” Journal of Library Administration 53(4): 234–54. doi:10.1080/01930826.2013.865389.
   Google Scholar
• Qutab, S., and K. Mahmood. 2009. “Library web sites in Pakistan: An analysis of content.” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 43(4): 430–45. doi:10.1108/00330330910998075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raward, R. 2001. “Academic library website design principles: Development of a checklist.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 32(2): 123–36. doi:10.1080/00048623.2001.10755151.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. L., P. T. Gavin, and A. K. Kamal. 2011. “Innovation in public and academic North American libraries: Examining white literature and website applications.” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 35(4): 397–422. doi:10.1353/ils.2011.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmetzke, A., and D. Comeaux. 2009. “Accessibility trends among academic library and library school web sites in the USA and Canada.” Journal of Access Services 6(1/2): 137–52. doi:10.1080/15367960802286286.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, L. 2004. Sinking or swimming?: The state of web sites in Ohio’s public libraries. http://www.designforthelittleguy.com/study.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Teague-Rector, S., A. Ballard, and S. K. Pauley. 2011. “The North Carolina State University libraries search experience: Usability testing tabbed search interfaces for academic libraries.” Journal of Web Librarianship 5(2): 80–95. doi:10.1080/19322909.2011.568822.
   Google Scholar
• Tidal, J. 2012. “Creating a user-centered library homepage: A case study.” OCLC Systems and Services 28(2): 90–100. doi:10.1108/10650751211236631.
   Google Scholar
• Tolppanen, B. P., J. Miller, and M. H. Wooden. 2000. “An examination of library world wide web sites at medium-sized universities.” Internet Reference Services Quarterly 5(2): 5–17. doi:10.1300/J136v05n02_02.
   Google Scholar
• Tolppanen, B. P., J. Miller, M. H. Wooden, and L. M. Tolppanen. 2005. “Library World Wide Web sites at medium-sized universities: A re-examination.” Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10(2): 7–18. doi:10.1300/j136v10n02_02.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. State and county quick facts. U.S. Census Bureau. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18000.html.
   Google Scholar
• VandeCreek, L. M. 2005. “Usability analysis of Northern Illinois University libraries’ website: A case study.” OCLC Systems and Services 21(3): 181–92. doi:10.1108/10650750510612380.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, J. 2012. “Investigations into library web-scale discovery services.” Information Technology and Libraries 31(1): 32–82. doi:10.6017/ital.v31i1.1916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W3Schools. 2014a. Browser display statistics. W3Schools.com. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp.
   Google Scholar
• W3Schools. 2014b. Brower statistics. W3Schools.com. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp.
   Google Scholar