Comparing Classical and Resistant Outlier Rules

References

• Andrews , D. F. , Bickel , P. J. , Hampel , F. R. , Huber , P. J. , Rogers , W. H. and Tukey , J. W. 1972 . Robust Estimates of Location: Survey and Advances , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Barnett , V. and Lewis , T. 1984 . Outliers in Statistical Data, , 2nd ed. , New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Becker , R. A. , Chambers , J. M. and Wilks , A. R. 1988 . The New S Language , Pacific Grove , CA : Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Beckman , R. J. and Cook , R. D. 1983 . Outlier.s . Technometrics , 25 : 119 – 163 . (with discussion)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendre , S. M. and Kale , B. K. 1987 . Masking Effect on Tests for Outliers in Normal Samples . Biometrika , 74 : 891 – 896 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaloner , K. and Brant , R. 1988 . A Bayesian Approach to Outlier Detection and Residual Analysis . Biometrika , 25 : 651 – 660 .
   Google Scholar
• David , H. A. and Paulson , A. S. 1965 . The Performance of Several Tests for Outliers . Biometrika , 52 : 429 – 436 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devore , J. and Peck , R. 1986 . Statistics: The Exploration and Analysis of Data , 93 – 96 . St Paul , MN : West .
   Google Scholar
• Emerson , J. D. and Strenio , J. 1983 . “ Boxplots and Batch Comparison ” . In Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis , Edited by: Hoaglin , D. C. , Mosteller , F. and Tukey , J. W. 58 – 96 . New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin , D. C. 1985 . “ Summarizing Shape Numerically, the g-and-h Distributions ” . In Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes , Edited by: Hoaglin , D. C. , Mosteller , F. and Tukey , J. W. 461 – 513 . New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin , D. C. and Iglewicz , B. 1987 . Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 82 : 1147 – 1149 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoaglin , D. C. , Iglewicz , B. and Tukey , J. W. 1986 . Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 81 : 991 – 999 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall , D. G. and Stuart , A. 1969 . The Advanced Theory of Statistics , vol. 1 , 329 – 330 . London : Griffin .
   Google Scholar
• Kimber , A. C. 1982 . Testing for Many Outliers in an Exponential Sample . Applied Statistics , 31 : 263 – 271 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott , P. 1978 . Examination of the Behaviour of Tests for Outliers When More Than One Outlier Is Present . Applied Statistics , 27 : 10 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Rosner , B. 1983 . Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure . Technometrics , 25 : 165 – 172 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonoff , J. S. 1984 . A Comparison of Robust Methods and Detection of Outliers Techniques When Estimating a Location Parameter . Communications in Statistics, Part A–Theory and Methods , 13 : 813 – 842 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonoff , J. S. 1987a . Outlier Detection and Robust Estimation of Scale . Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation , 27 : 79 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Simonoff , J. S. 1987b . The Breakdown and Influence Properties of Outlier Rejection-Plus-Mean Procedures . Communications in Statistics, Part A–Theory and Methods , 16 : 1749 – 1760 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey , J. W. 1977 . Exploratory Data Analysis , 47 – 49 . Reading , MA : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg , S. 1985 . Applied Linear Regression, , 2nd ed. , 106 – 127 . New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar