REFERENCES
- Box, G. E.P., Hunter, J.S. (1961), The 2k − p Fractional Factorial Designs, Technometrics, 3, 311–351.
- Drew, S., Homem-de Mello, T. (2005), Some Large Deviation Results for Latin Hypercube Sampling,” in Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, 673–681.
- He, X., Qian, P. Z.G. (2011), Nested Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercube Designs, Biometrika, 98, 721–731.
- Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J. (1998), Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 13, 455–492.
- Joseph, V.R., Hung, Y. (2008), Orthogonal-Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs, Statistica Sinica, 18, 171–186.
- Lehmann, E.L. (1966), Some Concepts of Dependence, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 1137–1153.
- Loeppky, J.L., Moore, L.M., Williams, B.J. (2010), Batch Sequential Designs for Computer Experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140, 1452–1464.
- Loeppky, J.L., Moore, L.M., Williams, B.J. (2011), Projection Array Based Designs for Computer Experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 142, 1493–1505.
- Loh, W.L. (1996), On Latin Hypercube Sampling, Annals of Statistics, 24, 2058–2080.
- McKay, M.D., Conover, W.J., Beckman, R.J. (1979), A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code, Technometrics, 21, 239–245.
- Mease, D., Bingham, D. (2006), Latin Hyperrectangle Sampling for Computer Experiments, Technometrics, 48, 467–477.
- Mee, R.W., Peralta, M. (2000), Semifolding 2k − p Designs, Technometrics, 42, 122–134.
- Morris, M., Mitchell, T. (1995), Exploratory Designs for Computational Experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402.
- Morris, M.D., Mitchell, T.J., Ylvisaker, D. (1993), Bayesian Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments: Use of Derivatives in Surface Prediction, Technometrics, 35, 243–255.
- Niederreiter, H. (1992), Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
- Owen, A.B. (1994), Controlling Correlations in Latin Hypercube Samples, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1517–1522.
- ——— (1995), Randomly Permuted (t, m, s)-nets and (t, s)-Sequences, Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing. Lecture Notes in Statistics (Vol. 106), New York: Springer, pp. 299–317.
- Qian, P. Z.G. (2009), Nested Latin Hypercube Designs, Biometrika, 96, 957–970.
- Rennen, G., Husslage, B., Van Dam, E.R., Hertog, D. (2010), Nested Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 41, 371–395.
- Sallaberry, C.J., Helton, J.C., Hora, S.C. (2008), Extension of Latin Hypercube Samples With Correlated Variables, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 1047–1059.
- Stein, M. (1987), Large Sample Properties of Simulations Using Latin Hypercube Sampling, Technometrics, 29, 143–151.
- Tang, B. (1993), Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercubes, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1392–1397.
- Tong, C. (2006), Refinement Strategies for Stratified Sampling Methods, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 1257–1265.
- Wang, G.G. (2003), Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points, Journal of Mechanical Design, 125, 210–220.
- Xiu, D. (2010), Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.